similar to: Cisco 7960 Skinny calling SIP phone

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Cisco 7960 Skinny calling SIP phone"

2004 Nov 17
3
chan-sccp problem, phone is not registering
Hi list! I'm trying to configure the Kirk IP 600 wireless (DECT) system. The wireless phones are regular DECT phones, the Kirk IP 600 is doing the voip part by registering/gatewaying the phones to a callmanager server. The phones do not work and I think the problem is that they do not register at asterisk but I'm not sure because I don't understand a thing of the sccp/skinny
2004 Aug 22
5
skinny or sccp?
Hi, please tell me, is original skinny support in Asterisk stil under development or is better to try chan_sccp from http://chan-sccp.sourceforge.net ? my first try was unsuccessfull (chan_sccp compile OK, but module loading fail during Asterisk startup) and my phone (C7940) seems to be not supported in original chan_skinny :( PJ
2004 Jan 13
4
Again: 7920 Cisco IP Phone Skinny & SIP
hi! i had some good news regarding the cisco 7920 and the internetworking with asterisk (and possibly SIP ?). Status: chan_sccp.so not coredumping anymore :-) Phone contantly in reboot loop [see below] :-( Reboot Loop means: ------------------ Phone auth's with AP Phone gets IP from DHCP & TFTP Server Phone loads OS7920.TXT Phone loads SEP<macaddr>.CNF.XML Phone loads
2004 Aug 23
3
Cisco 7960G, Skinny.conf, and reboots
I could use some skinny/Cisco help here. Was finally able to get the phone registered to * but whenever someone tries to call that phone it freezes and reboots itself. Same thing happens when you pick the handset up off the 7960G; it locks and reboots about 5 sec later. Here is what * shows when I plug the phone in: -- Starting Skinny session from 64.72.107.1 Device SEP000F3442E4A7 is
2005 Jan 31
1
chan_sccp bug / problem
Hi list! I'm having some problems with chan_sccp and a Kirk IP600. Basically the handsets work (they emulate a Cisco 7940) but I have the following issues: 1. If a handset is in a conversation and there is a new incoming call, the incoming audio is muted (but the other party can still hear anything spoken on the handset). What is normal Asterisk behaviour, that a handset is left alone
2011 Jun 13
13
Cisco IP Phones and Skinny in asterisk
Hi All; Can anyone advise if using Cisco IP Phones in skinny protocol is fine or not? Or it is better to use it in SIP protocol? Regards Bilal
2010 Sep 27
2
SCCP (skinny) phone behind NAT: RTP dest addr wrong
Greetings: I have a working configuration for SCCP on our LANS which doesn't route RTP correctly to a skinny phone behind NAT registering from a remote public IP. Configuration: asterisk 1.4.35 servicing only skinny phones trunked to asterisk 1.2.40 which services chan_phone FXS, zap FXO and SIP phones; both instances of asterisk are behind NAT and run on the same host (using different base
2005 Jun 09
1
Cisco 7960 and Skinny
Hi, I have bought two Cisco 7960 phones. I have tried to set-up them to work with Asterisk over Skinny protocol, but when I try to dial the phone from Asterisk it says that all lines are busy. Is there something that should be configured on the phone's side? Can someone help me with that? Also, I would like to upgrade these phones to use SIP. How can I get the SIP firmware for my phones. I
2003 Sep 18
1
Skinny + XMLDefault
Please forgive me my ignorance ... I've spent two days trying to find out something about the format of the default configuration file, which CCM produces. The only example I have so far is the one from the chan_sccp source. There were tons of references on entering the callmanager commands on a cisco command line - which I don't have (don't need thanks to chan_skinny + chan_sccp).
2003 Dec 23
1
OT: SIP vs. Skinny protocol
I assume there are several people on this list that have Cisco Call Manager implementations under their belt.... We are beginning a call manager implementation and the first question I asked Cisco was, should we use SIP or Skinny. Cisco is pushing me towards Skinny, saying that I will lose some functionality with SIP. They also say that most of their customers implement skinny. I see two
2005 Oct 16
1
Can Asterisk "proxy" a SIP phone to make it look like a Cisco skinny softphone?
Hi there We have a Cisco VOIP environment here, with hard and softphones. I have a softphone account/etc, but I'm a Linux user and (as far as I'm aware) there is no Cisco softphone for Linux. However I can run Asterisk. So I was wondering if there is a way to "convert" a SIP phone transaction into a SKINNY transaction so that the Cisco environment thinks it is a Cisco
2008 Oct 09
1
Cisco 7960 sccp, Skinny and 1.4
Hi All, I'm thinking of creating a new asterisk server using the latest 1.4 stable release to replace my ageing Asterisk SVN-branch-1.2-r7231 (its been a while!). My only concern - my phones are Cisco 7960's (with sccp firmware 7.2 loaded) and to support them better, I remember compiling in a skinny(?) driver to replace the (from what I could tell) basic in built sccp support. After
2005 Feb 22
2
Repost: How do I install Skinny support for non sip cisco phones
hi All, Sorry to repost but................ I have a server setup that runs sip no problem. I want to try a cisco phone. how do I a) Tell if I have skinny support loaded b) Load it onto a debian system Many thanks
2005 Mar 21
1
chan-sccp-easter2005 make error with stable 1.0.6?
When I try to compile the new chan-sccp-easter2005 with asterisk 1.0.6 I get the following error on make: Now compiling .... chan_sccp.c 744 lines chan_sccp.c:67: conflicting types for `sccp_request' chan_sccp.h:1723: previous declaration of `sccp_request' sccp_pbx.h:5: storage size of `sccp_tech' isn't known make: *** [.tmp/chan_sccp.o] Error 1 I tried looking in
2007 Mar 21
3
Cisco 7970 with skinny on * 1.4.1
Evnin' (o; As chan_sccp is pretty much dead, doesn't compile on FBSD anyway and isn't supported on * 1.4.x I tried going with chan_skinny... The Cisco 7970 registers and is being acknowledged by * but that's it... I see no lines on the 7970 display configured and it is not reachable or it can't make any outboudn calls... The docs are pretty non-existent for skinny and the
2004 Jan 20
2
I got it (was: Cisco 7940 with asterisk)
Hi again, I found chan_skinny and that seems to work pretty good. the SCCP one filled out all the buttons really nice, but skinny seems to be working. How do I fill out the second line button on the phone with skinny.conf? Thanks much! ...Jeff
2005 Jul 13
5
chan_sccp new release
http://chan-sccp.berlios.de/ 20050713 ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/chan-sccp/chan_sccp-20050713.tar.bz2 I didn't have a spare 7960 to use this week, so maybe some line issue is still present. - fixed a memory leak on database updates (dnd, cfwd*) - fixed old memory leak on unload (now unload chan_sccp.so and load chan_sccp.so work. It does reload the config when asterisk is running) - socket
2005 Jul 07
14
Asterisk@home and Cisco 7910
Hi, Does anybody knows how to get this work? I have been searching all over and can?t find the way. Using chan_sccp tge phone can log in and has line tone. But the problem is that it is not able to receive nor dial out. Any help would be apprecieted. Thanks Javier --------------------------------- Sell on Yahoo! Auctions - No fees. Bid on great items. -------------- next part
2008 Apr 22
1
Cisco 7961 + 7914, speeddials, BLF & Asterisk 1.4?
Hi, Does anyone have any experience with a Cisco 7961 + 7914 Operator Console setup and speeddials/BLF on Asterisk 1.4? Would appreciate feedback if this works reliably. I have a 7961 on skinny registering on an 1.4.19 box with chan_sccp and speeddials work fine so that part seems ok. I have no experience with the BLF part. >From googling around it seems that BLF on the 7914 only works with
2004 Jul 29
2
chan_sccp2 testers needed
Dear Skinny/SCCP lovers :-) I've just completed & uploaded to the cvs the newest version with fixed redial key AND implementation of speed dials. please test extensively and report any bugs. i know that the display is not yet set correctly but the buttons are working as expected. Enjoy testing... --jan (*1) http://chan-sscp.sf.net (*2) yes, bugtracker is down at the moment, will fix