similar to: Digium TE405 card and Matra PBX

Hello asterisk-users, I have solved interconnection between Digium TE405 and Matra PBX. I plug this card to another computer and with the same configuration parameters card now works without problem. First server has 2xPIII/1GHz and 256MB of RAM, Adaptec SCSI adapter and SCSI system disk. I don't know now, what chipset it was, but mainboard was from Supermicro, then I pretend Intel chipset.

Hello all, please, can anyone advertise me some channel banks, which can operate with E1 (30 FXS)? Rack-mountable option is welcome. I've tried to google, but I've not found nothing appropriate. More than one E1 link is welcome too. Everyone channel banks, which I've found, was between T1 and FXS(O), but I have Digium E1 card and I want use for one line 30 channels and not only 24.

Hi, Is it possible to use 4 TE405 boards in one server ? It mean, to have 16 E1s on just one server. Can somebody tell me how many boards is it possible to have on one server ? Thanks, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060605/29e9d42d/attachment.htm

I have a TE405/TE410P card that was working on 1.0.X I upgraded the OS to Centos 4.5, Updated asterisk to 1.4 and zaptel to 1.4.5 and libpri. I copied all the zaptel and zapata and extensions.conf files from 1.0 I did update extensions.conf from 1.0 to 1.4 commands. I cannot get the card to work in 1.4.10. AHHH! I see with zttool that the T1 is in Green, I see calls coming in as the bits go

Hi iam installing zaptel 1.2.10 on my FC5 when i make iam getting following error any one suggest me whats wrong, i have installed source also in the same server. grep: /lib/modules/2.6.15-1.2054_FC5/build/include/linux/autoconf.h: No such file or directory ZAPTELVERSION="1.2.10" build_tools/make_version_h > version.h.tmp if cmp -s version.h.tmp version.h ; then echo; else \

Hi, I have to link an Asterisk Box with a PBX Matra 6501. System look like this : E1------Te110P Asterisk Te110P-----E1----Matra 6501-----Phones | | Ip Phones Incoming call from E1 will enter on asterisk, if incoming number is _800n then go to IP phones. In this case no problem. But if it's an another call i want to return call to my

NOT WANTED On Sun, 30 Nov 1997 samba@samba.anu.edu.au wrote: > SAMBA Digest 1508 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) How do I use multiple NT password servers > by jurgessj@b1b.ok.boeing.com (John E. Jurgess ) > 2) Re: How do I use multiple NT password servers > by Luke

I have got the change to set op an Asterisk PBX for one department in a large organisation. This means that in instead of connecting the Asterisk direct to the PSTN thought E1 interface (ISDN) I have to connect thought the big PBX central (IS3000).(http://pbcextra.net/commonnet/marcom/pdf/001_06221.pdf) Is there any body who has experience with this? The right size of connection between the

Hello ! I 've some questions how bridging of ISDN calls is done. Assume an asterisk system with a TE405 card equipped. (PRI1 - PRI4) An incoming ISDN call on PRI1 is transfered back to PRI3. Unless there is DTMF detection or other things involved, the bridging is done without Asterisk. Does this card have a some sort of cross connection ? Does the PCM leave the card ? Or is there some DMA

Can't anyone stop self-promotion and tell the poor guy what he needs. A T1/E1 X-over cable using an RJ-45 (8-cond.) is pinned out as follows: 1 - 4 2 - 5 3 - NU 4 - 1 5 - 2 6 - NU 7 - NU 8 - NU NU = Not Used I have not in my experience seen any problems with using a Good Quality Cat5 vs. Cat 3 (telco standard) cable for X-connects. YMMV, but you should be fine. As far as the shielding

Hi list, we want to connect asterisk to an traditionnal PBX (EADS 6550/Matra). People from telco told that they can't connect two PBX's using E1/T1 or only with QSig signaling. I wanted to use EuroISDN. In this case, it was me told that VN6-VN7 would be used. The PBX has a spare ADQ card installed on which we would connect. Has someone a such working setup? Is it working well? More

We are doing this with the latest spandsp, iaxmodem and hylafax. Seems to work very well for us so far. -Jonathan > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Michael Gaudette > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 3:34 PM > To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial

Dear All, I am currently have this problem in which I am sending call out from the Zaptel TE405 to a VoIP gateway. But the problem that the call over to the VoIP Gateway will always have a fake ring tone. Can you please give some pointer how to fix this problem? This problem is existing in my Asterisk 1.2.1 box. Also when compiling Asterisk 1.2.5 and tried to run it with the Asterisk-addon,

Did anybody know, Is it possible to establish a ISDN DIAL up Connection and Analog Dial up Connection (V90) trough asterisk with Digium TE405? Thanks a lot for help. Nico Giefing -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060328/3b657058/attachment.htm

I for one think it is a great idea to buy a book with hard earned money and wait a few days to a week just to get an answer to a question that is freely available on the internet immediately. Hard pressed to think of anything in the "book" that is not on with wiki with more up to date and useful information. -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Lopez

----- Original Message ----- > Ooooh, I've got it working a treat, thanks to some great help from people on > this list. I *am* currently writing up a how to, and will post it as soon as > I'm done. > > Basically, take the line from the meridian, and chop the rj45 off. (!) put > another RJ45 on, but with the wires crossed (IOW a cross over cable). Plug > the meridian

Hi all. We are getting our first PRI line to use with Asterisk and one of the technical specifications is about framing, structured or unstructured. The main difference about them is almost clear for me: http://ckp.made-it.com/g704.html says: "G.704 is the framing specification for G.703. A carrier can 'steal' a 64kbps time slot (TS0) from a 2.048 Mbps line and use this to

worked came to one ring only now. Thank you very much. If I use TE410 or TE405 instead of X100P. do it make that first ring disappear? Shakil -----Original Message----- From: tony@softins.clara.co.uk [mailto:tony@softins.clara.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 12:27 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Auto Answering PSTN --> Asterisk using X100PCard In

I was playing around with the Flash Operator Panel, and came smack into a brick wall. We have a * box linked to a legacy Meridian System using a EuroIDSN link (TE405p) with 10 channels enabled. I also have several SIP extensions. What I wanted to do was to have a button for each of our (say) 32 users, 5 of which are on SIP. That leaves the other 27 on Zap. A potential of 27 users on 10

I'm sure that this question gets asked frequently, but a quick perusal of the list archives shows that it hasn't been asked in a least a month or so, so pardon any repetition. What is the current state of asterisk on linux 2.6? I ask, because I spent yesterday giving it a whirl, and everything seems to go just fine till the very last minute. Zaptel, libpri and asterisk compile just