similar to: Unsupported CPU Error

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "Unsupported CPU Error"

2007 Oct 07
11
geforce 4 mx + 2.6.22 problem
Hello i have an Imac g4 flat panel 1ghz with geforce 4mx , ubuntu gutsy and a 2.6.22 kernel . I have tried nouveau, but i have some problem. I post also my log ... thx ___________________________________ L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail: http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was
2007 Jun 15
2
VBR quality...
When i use VBR do i need to set VBR quality or speex quality? Is the speex quality referred to the overall quality and instead VBR quality only if i use VBR? Do these qualities override each other? Thanks. --------------------------------- L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
2007 Jun 01
2
Decoder and discarded frames..., system hangs
Do i always need to tell the decoder that some packets has been lost? I noticed that if i discard packets without passing NULL and advising the decoder, sometimes my system hangs and i need to reset my PDA. Since the decoder is mantaining a state, i suppose i always need to tell it a packet has been discarded through a sequence number check. Or can i just pass to speex_decode_int whatever i
2007 May 20
1
Speex bit allocation
I would like to know if my vision of things is correct about frame structure. -------------------------------------------------------- Frame header -------------------------------------------------------- Subframe1 header|Subframe1 content| -------------------------------------------------------- Subframe2 header|Subframe2 content| --------------------------------------------------------
2007 May 04
1
AMR vs Speex on wireless networks.
In order to develop a Voip application, today i should make it robust to bit-errors over wireless networks. This is an actually lack of Speex, infact what i've understood is that if a packet arrives corrupted, i must pass NULL to the decoder in order to let it know. My target is to use UDP (with checksum field disabled) and exploit also corrupted packets giving them to the AMR codec. Otherwise
2008 Jan 01
2
Opensuse 10.3 does not charge dom0
I decided to upgrade from openSuse 10.2 to openSuse 10.3. I installed xen things, but when I boot using xen option the system is blocked. It appears the green window, with little suse logo in the middle, and mouse cursor, but the system crashes. My computer is a Pentium 4 1,5 GHz, 512 MB of RAM. I attached "diff boot.msg boot.omsg" (as diff opensuse-normal-kernel opensuse-xen-kernel)
2007 Jun 05
1
How to generate confort noise?
Can i use a separate instance of the decoder passing NULL to generate white noise or something that is similar to confort noise? I need to feed it to my output audio autput device for each frame i don't receive in time. Or should i just use the same decoder instance of voice and just pass NULL when i discard or loss frames? Is that the best way? How can i accomplish this purpose? Thanks.
2007 Jun 09
1
PLC tuning...
My % of packets lost vary usually in function of signal strenght. Since i cannot forecast the % of frames i will lost except with the criteria just said, could be a good approach to set the PLC tuning % dynamically during runtime basing it statistically on the number of ACKed frames? Does the % of frames lost include silence frames (6 bytes frames, i'm using VBR)? So do i need to consider
2007 Jun 17
1
PLC tuning question
Does the PLC tuning affect only the quality in case of PL? Does it affect the quality also in good PL conditions? Thanks. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2007 May 18
4
Testing for 1.2beta2
Hi everyone, I'm planning on releasing Speex 1.2beta2 in the next few days. I'd appreciate if everyone could try and test the current svn to make sure no bug crept in for your favourite plarform/application. Cheers, Jean-Marc
2007 Jun 05
2
Output sampling rate slightly increased. Will speex complain?
I noticed my latency is gradually increasing in my audio loopback test application. I just hear what i say, encoding and decoding on the fly. I suppose 8000 Hz for the output device is not 8000 Hz for the input one, they differs since they could refer to different time generators (i suppose...). To solve the problem i rised the output sampling rate from 8000 to 8200 Hz, and now i'm not
2007 May 22
3
Clicking Problems with slightly clipped audio
It appears that both the echo canceller and the noise reducer (NR) introduce rather severe clicking artifacts when presented with audio that has slightly overloaded the A/D converters. I am talking about speech that sounds just slightly distorted, due to clipping, when simply played back. If I pass that speech through the echo canceller or the noise reducer, it acquires really loud clicks and/or
2007 May 05
0
AMR vs Speex on wireless networks.
Rethinking to BER in UMTS, it seems acceptable to use speex on it do you agree? ----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: marzullo maio <marzullo63@yahoo.it> A: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Inviato: Sabato 5 maggio 2007, 23:06:40 Oggetto: Re: [Speex-dev] AMR vs Speex on wireless networks. NB for CSD/HSCSD and WB for UMTS/HSDPA. The UMTS/HSDPA
2007 May 22
0
Speex bit allocation
Ops i meant: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wideband bit|Mode ID|LSP|OL pitch|OL Exc gain| --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fine pitch1| --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pitch gain1| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2007 Jun 19
0
manual partitioning with centos 5
hi, i'm used to manual partition and format disks before installing the O.S. but with centos 5 this results in an unbootable system. Usually, to manual partition the disks I use the installation disk in recovery mode.. The partition schema I choose was: /dev/sda1 /boot /dev/sda2 swap /dev/sda3 LVM PV inside the LVM VG I created the following LV / /var /home /tmp Then I formatted all
2007 Oct 15
0
-minline-all-stringops
hello when i Tried to compile xf86-video-nouveau come this message: cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-minline-all-stringops" make[2]: *** [nv_accel_common.lo] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 ___________________________________ L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail:
2007 Dec 13
0
nouveau works on my powerpc
nouveau works with some little bug on my imac g4 geforce4mmx .. my dmesg [ 8086.085247] PCI: Unable to reserve mem region #2:8000000 at 98000000 for device 0000:00:10.0 [ 8086.085390] [drm] Detected an NV17 generation card (0x018900a3) [ 8086.085480] [drm] Initialized nouveau 0.0.10 20060213 on minor 0 [ 8086.085490] [drm] Used old pci detect: framebuffer loaded [ 8226.255226] [drm] OF bios
2007 Mar 29
0
Debugging "The typing of the dead"
Ok, I ran my app with +ddraw,+d3d. I got a few warnings related to d3d here and there, ie: warn:ddraw:IDirectDrawImpl_SetCooperativeLevel (0x16d0f8) Unhandled flag DDSCL_ALLOWREBOOT, harmless warn:d3d:IWineD3DDeviceImpl_Clear Clearing depth and/or stencil without a depth stencil buffer attached, returning WINED3DERR_INVALIDCALL warn:d3d:IWineD3DDeviceImpl_CreateSurface Creating a surface with a
2008 Mar 02
1
using rsync for mirroring: deleted files from source and kept in dest, better handling?
Hello, I'm starting to explore rsync to mirror some directories from a disk to another locally. If I understand it right, if I don't include any --delete* parameter, when updating the copy, if some files have been deleted from the source directory they're not deleted from the destination directory. That's exactly what I need, but I'd like those files be treated differently, I
2007 May 02
0
Fixed point port status, 2 May 2007?
Could you please explain what features has been already ported to FIXED_POINT and which others aren't yet? Please add some details on how to understand by looking inside code if a feature is alredy ported or not. For example, where i see float declaration or wherever i see you're using FPU doing float multiplications/divisions etc, this without any alternative code with FIXED_POINT