similar to: fc5 and link to sources?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "fc5 and link to sources?"

2006 Oct 21
1
zaptel 1.2.10 make problem
Hi iam installing zaptel 1.2.10 on my FC5 when i make iam getting following error any one suggest me whats wrong, i have installed source also in the same server. grep: /lib/modules/2.6.15-1.2054_FC5/build/include/linux/autoconf.h: No such file or directory ZAPTELVERSION="1.2.10" build_tools/make_version_h > version.h.tmp if cmp -s version.h.tmp version.h ; then echo; else \
2007 Feb 20
6
FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64
I tried to test Asterisk 1.4 on FC6 x86_64. I have it working on FC5 x86_64 very good, but since FC keeps updating, I tried to follow newer kernel versions. I can't pass the zaptel compilation. Everything is OK, but when I finished, and tried to load it, allways got module not found when I run modprobe zaptel, and modprobe ztdummy. I already tried to modify is with the sed 1 option but
2007 Feb 21
1
Problem Installing Zaptel
While trying to compile zaptel 1.2.8 on a FC5 I get the following error: /lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5smp/build make -C /lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5smp/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8 modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5-smp-i686' CC [M] /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8/zaptel.o In file included from /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8/zaptel.c:40:
2006 Mar 25
6
Cannot have eth0 in domU
Hello, I am trying to run Xen 3 on FC5, but I cannot have the eth0 interface appear in domU. I have 3 servers running FC3 and Xen 2 with various domUs since a year. Everything is fine on that front. I took one of the server, upgraded it to FC5 and did the following: - yum install xen kernel-xen0 kernel-xenU - grub.conf contains title Fedora Core (2.6.15-1.2054_FC5xen0 root (hd0,0) kernel
2006 Mar 24
1
problems compiling zaptel on FC5
Hi, I just updated to FC5, and used zaptel-1.2.1 as it was with my last version, it show this error: CC [M] /usr/local/src/zaptel/wcusb.o /usr/local/src/zaptel/wcusb.c:1452: error: unknown field ?owner? specified in initializer /usr/local/src/zaptel/wcusb.c:1452: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type make[2]: *** [/usr/local/src/zaptel/wcusb.o] Error 1 make[1]: ***
2006 Jun 13
2
Compiling zaptel on FC5
Are there any generic install guidelines for compiling the Zaptel drivers on FC5? This is my first install of Asterisk (and my first FC5 system) and I'm having a great deal of trouble getting it to cooperate. make clean and make are definitely not playing nice, telling me that "You don't appear to have the kernel sources installed" when I'm pretty sure that I do. Any
2006 Dec 05
2
zaptel-1.4.0-beta2 Getting it to compile on Fedora Core 6 _64bit
I keep running into the dead end that it can't find config.h in the source tree. It looks like newer kernels don't use it anymore. Someone ran into this awhile back when compiling 1.2 and it looks as though the issue was never resolved. Any ideas? Last time I tried this, I was on fedora core 5 64bit and all went well. It's not working on this newer setup Any ideas on what I can do
2011 Jan 04
5
MOH problems (asterisk 1.4.38)
Hi list, I just installed Asterisk 1.4.38 (on an updated Centos 5.5 machine) and am getting this error : WARNING[6472]: res_musiconhold.c:856 moh_scan_files: getcwd() failed: No such file or directory with the default musiconhold.conf file. When I change musiconhold.conf to this: [default] mode=mp3 directory=/var/lib/asterisk/mohmp3 (and have converted all the wav files to mp3 and put them
2019 Dec 02
4
Centos 8 install of squirrelmail
Hi, I am trying to install Squirrelmail on Centos 8 but it seems that package is missing in the EPEL repo for Centos 8? Anyone know if this was on purpose or how to tell which packages won't be created? Thanks, Earl
2019 Dec 02
2
Centos 8 install of squirrelmail
> > > On 2019-12-02 13:15, Earl Terwilliger via CentOS wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to install Squirrelmail on Centos 8 but it seems that >> package >> is missing in the EPEL repo for Centos 8? Anyone know if this was on >> purpose or how to tell which packages won't be created? > > As far as I know, squirrelmail is noT actively maintained
2007 Jun 18
1
Do I really have the right ATrpms repo?
I copied exactly where Axel provided into atrmps.repo. I have the line: atrpms.repo:baseurl=http://dl.atrpms.net/el5-x86_64/atrpms/stable but the rpms that are being flagged as updates pretty much all have fc5 in their names. e.g.: ---> Package mplayer-fonts.noarch 4:1.0-7.at set to be updated ---> Package mplayer.i386 4:1.0-60_r23482.fc5 set to be updated ---> Package
2019 Dec 03
1
Centos 8 install of squirrelmail
Hi, You can rebuild the RPM on a CentOS 8 box from https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/SRPMS/Packages/s/squirrelmail-1.4.23-1.el7.20190710.src.rpm or https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/31/Everything/source/tree/Packages/s/squirrelmail-1.4.23-2.fc31.20190710.src.rpm and install the resulting RPM. For the source https://sourceforge.net/p/squirrelmail/code/HEAD/tree/
2006 Sep 10
1
AppleMail 1.3 filter problem [solved] / fc5 package of 1.0rc7
Hi, Folks, I recently migrated from courier-imapd to dovecot when I migrated a machine from rh9 to fc5. I managed to hit a snag with the 1.0b8 version of dovecot that's currently in fc5. With AppleMail 1.3 I was seeing most of my incoming mail go missing. To make a long story short, AppleMail was applying mail filters inappropriately (walking right past a 'stop processing'
2006 May 08
2
Asterisk/Zaptel 64-bit?
Dear All, I was wondering will there be any problems or changes that I will need to do to compile the current Asterisk(1.2.7)/Zaptel(1.2.5)/Libpri(1.2.2) source from www.asterisk.org into a 64-bit binaries? I am currently using the following hardware for my new server. CPU: Pentium D 930 3.0 GHz Mobo: Intel D945PSN Motherboard RAM: 512MB 533MHz DDR-2 Drive: SATA II Seagate 160GB Card: TE406
2007 Jul 31
1
pop3 connections hanging
Hi, dovecot --version 1.0.beta8 dovecot -n login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(imap): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(pop3): /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login mail_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap mail_executable(imap): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap mail_executable(pop3): /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3
2006 Nov 15
2
Installing Ztdummy on Fedora Core 5
Hi, Am trying to make zaptel with ztdummy uncommented in FC5 but am getting make error. Has anyone gotten this to work? Rogers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061115/7b3d8971/attachment.htm
2007 Jun 14
3
Trying to understand Suspend 2
I am trying to understand Suspend 2 and what I have to do to get it working in Centos 5. There is quite a bit for it at ATrpms: http://www.atrpms.net/dist/el5/hibernate-suspend2/ http://www.atrpms.net/dist/el5/kernel-suspend2/ The later is the kernel patches that they refer to at the Suspend2 website, so I don't have to recompile the kernel? I noticed that over at:
2008 Apr 03
12
Web page to show online extensions?
Hello Has someone written a web page (preferably PHP) that simply shows what extensions are currently online? Thank you.
2004 Nov 29
2
Compiling zaptel 1.0.2 on Fedora Core
I'm trying to get zaptel 1.0.2 compiled on FC2 or FC3 and I'm getting compile time errors. Systems include: FC2: Linux xxxxxxxxxxxx 2.6.9-1.3_FC2 #1 Mon Nov 15 14:46:43 EST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux FC3: Linux xxxxxxxxxxxx 2.6.9-1.681_FC3 #1 Thu Nov 18 15:13:22 EST 2004 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux /usr/home/bwright/zaptel-1.0.2> make linux26 ... make -C /usr/src/linux-2.6
2005 Jul 11
4
Zaptel won't compile under Fedora Core 4
I hope someone can offer me some help with this. Basically, the current CVS version of Zaptel will not compile under Fedora Core 4. I have closely followed the directions in http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+Fedora+Core+3 using the versions given in the FC4 distro with no luck. Here's the output when I run "make linux26". Any help would be great. TIA.