similar to: The CAVP is now accepting memberships applications

In the latest CAVP conference call, the membership body voted to restrict membership to VoIP LEC's and to create a seperate membership body for any other parties interested in contributing to the CAVP's efforts in CRTC lobbying and providing a unified industry presence in the Canadian telco industry with a view to VoIP services. Accordingly, I would like to propose an adjutant association

If you are a Canadian VoIP provider or CLEC, help make a difference by joining the CAVP: www.cavp.ca >OMFG, >I thought April Fools day was over. This is hard to believe. If true it >tells me that Bell has not changed at all. They are still trying to >manipulate and take advantage of the parts of the market they have absolute >control over. The CRTC was right to continue to

Hi, We've got a dedicated T1 with two trunks running into our ILECs selective router for 911. Split out of the T1 into two MF CAMA trunks on ILEC side. I'm trying to use asterisks e911 signaling, but I'm having trouble with the dial command. (== Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:1/0/0)) I'm missing something and I'm thinking it has to do with the hookstate

Ok, So... we've been looking at Intrado as a solution for national E911. They claim to be able to offer FCC compliant E911 services for VoIP companies. However, as I look into things further, they don't seem to have links to all the PSAPs for E911. Now, I understand if the PSAP is not capable of receiving E911 information, the VoIP provider is under no obligation to provide it.

Hi, I'm trying to configure 2 parallel sip trunks between 2 boxes. However I seem to have the problem that when making a call from Box 2 to Box 1, it sometimes says authentication failed because it is using the username of the other trunk. Here's my configuration: Box 1: [dp-dp2] type=peer username=dp-dp2 secret=mysecret qualify=yes host=box.2.ip.address context=from-internal [e911-dp2]

Hello, Please join us Wednesday May 17th for an informal kickoff to openly discuss and formulate a plan to resurrect the Ottawa Asterisk User Group as well as discuss additional topics of interest that impact the VOIP marketplace and may also be included in our collective strategy. We'll also hear from the folks responsible for the Canadian Association of VOIP Providers (CAVP)

The LLVM Foundation is pleased to announce its new Board of Directors: Chandler Carruth Hal Finkel Arnaud de Grandmaison David Kipping Anton Korobeynikov Tanya Lattner Chris Lattner John Regehr Three new members and five continuing members were elected to the eight person board. The new board consists of individuals from corporations and from the academic and scientific communities. They also

During the course of a conversation with an member of the IT group who handles the E911 center for our county, I learned that all of the county's E911 is voip based. This got me to wondering why we could not just configure up a SIP or some such trunk directly to the E911 center to handle our emergency traffic. The county seems interested in exploring the possibility. So I'm wondering if

Hi everyone. I'm currently running through FIPS validation, and this year CAVP requires KDF tests for SSH. I'm running OpenSSH v5.6p1 and I see that the 6 keys that I need are derived in kex_derived_keys in kex.c. However, I don't yet see any way for me to access this function from an existing command line tool, being able to pass in K, H, and the session_id from the test vector. Is

http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=73943&site=lightreading I know e911 has been discussed on ths list before, but I just read this and it got me thinking that if you have a Wholesale VoIP carrier - wouldn't they have to pass e911 on to you as a VoIP provider to, in turn, pass on to your end-users? Of course there would be a fee - just wondering if this is how the

I called bandwidth.com to buy a sip line from them for $30 a month. But they said they will not sell me a sip line since the address on the account is Citrus Heights CA and they can not provide services in that area. On asking further the person clarified that there is no e911 service available in the 916 area code for bandwidth.com But other providers like www.broadvoice.com are able to provide

At 1:34 PM -0700 on 4/5/04, Mike Machado wrote: > > Was there any aggressive pricing given for nationwide voip LD? > >Level3 had several products, one they called Enhanced which was supposed >to also include E911 service. They quoted me about $.01 per minute >inbound or outbound nation wide. They said they support the top 300 >cities in the US and, of course, have plans to

I just set up a t1 with 2 camma mf 911 trunks on it, and I am having a issue with it. We can call 911 which is routed out these new trunks, and it goes to the 911 center, but they are not getting the ANI and hence "no record found". Our LEC is Embarq, and they say they can see the call come in and send: KP-911-ST and then KP-0-911-ST rather then KP-0-ANI-ST I turned on all the debug

Does anyone have any experience with any SIP or IAX providers that support E911? I'd love to convert entirely to Asterisk at my house, but the lack of emergency dialing has been a major hold-up for me. Thanks in advance for any suggestions! -- Kyle Sexton

How exactly does Asterisk provide E911 service??

One of my providers has a different SIP account for each number. I have all of my users in one outbound context (caller ID passes fine). How do I ensure that the callers get routed down their correct SIP account with my provider for e911 purposes without each having their own context? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -------------- next part

I don't know if 911 uses caller ID or BTN (Billing Telephone Number) 900 calls, operator calls, and 800 calls use the BTN not the Caller ID... Anyone???? 3. Re: E911 and asterisk (Martin Pycko) Message: 3 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:05:38 -0500 (CDT) From: Martin Pycko <martinp@digium.com> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] E911 and asterisk

> Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 15:17:53 -0700 > From: "trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com" <trixter@0xdecafbad.com> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 Options > To: Ira Burton <ira.burton@gmail.com>, Asterisk Users Mailing List - > > On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 15:55 -0600, Ira Burton wrote: > > I am curious if anybody has pointers on the best way to get the 7

We were able to solve the below problem. I'll post it in case someone encounters the same issue. No need to respond or even read unless you see a better way. Thanks - John We have manually set callerID on our outbound lines to reflect the appropriate DID both for e911 and to be polite to folks we call, e.g.: exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,1,Set(CALLERID(num)=5197546340) exten =>

Greetings to all, Can anyone think of a reason that a Softphone would not be compatible with the F.C.C's order for E911? If the user is able to update their address when they move their laptop, etc.