similar to: Re: Shielding of T1/E1 cables WAS RE: PinoutsforT1/E1 crossover

> I've never bothered to check to see if cat5 cables use the appropriate > mating twisted pairs or not. Since the pinouts are different for cat5 vs > T1 cables, I'd have to guess a single strand is used from two different > twisted pair groups. That wouldn't be cool, but in short runs it > probably doesn't have much of an impact. > IIRC, standard Ethernet uses

For some reason when I apply a function to a single row in R it works, but when that same row is in a data.frame it does not, see below: apply(dx[954,], 1, query.db) 2571 1092 0.06044147 3890 0.05948577 3273 0.05911261 794 0.05855583 4241 0.05854064 3560 0.05602690 apply(dx[954:955,], 1, query.db) $`2571` numeric(0) $`1194` 908 3754 5119 2835

Hi, I'm trying to calculate euclidean distance for my matrix rx1. Its a big matrix with 947 elements. However when i do the following, for(k in 1:947) for(m in (k+1):947){ A =rbind(A,c(k,m,ED(rx1[,k], rx1[,m]))) } I get the following error: ED(rx1[,k], rx1[,m]) : subscript out of bounds I checked for k in 1:100 and it runs fine; its a huge matrix and takes atleast an hour to run before I

Given the string > mystr <- "(Preconsuntivo del giorno gas 10 maggio 2007)Tj" I'm trying to detect and eliminate the string ")Tj" at the very end of mystr by means of gsub(rx2,"",mystr) BUT preparing the matching regexp string a warning pops up > rx2 <- "\)Tj$" Warning messages: 1: '\)' is an unrecognized escape in a

My telco used cat5 as well for the demarc to CPE. It's also with noting that many channel banks, such as my Atlas, and zapata.conf itself also have parameters to allow you to tune the gains to compensate for cable signal loss. I've never had to touch them, and my CPE is about 300 feet from the PRI demarc (with an ordinary Cat5 cable connecting them)

> Unless you're going for some kind of distance record, standard Cat5 will > work > without any issue on any modern installation. As I said, I'm pretty sure > (not 100%, but close) that the T1 specification is only Cat3, since it's > standard BellCore wire and they don't run your T1 loops (which aren't T1 > anymore, they're DS1 over HDSL or HDSL2) in

> Ever looked at the underground cable in the street outside your > building? If it's more than 20 years old, it's probably paper-insulated > gel-filled cable, with an _extremely_ thin amount of insulation between > the conductors and _zero_ insulation between the pairs. T1s seem to work > just fine on it, unless it's very old or they try to put more than 6-8 > spans

I was once told by a lineman that the cables they use didn't have that many twists in them because it wasn't needed, and that the extra twists would effectively use more cable and thus cost and weigh more than triple what they do now. He told me that with the number of twists in the Cat 5 cable it would cancel out any interference, but he also stated that the effective length was

//Just to not forget eth0 is WAN and eth1 is LAN . The box is NATing my lan. I configured tcng to shape both download and upload and i got connection loss again. Maybe it is my script fault or it is something bad with packets marking . this is how i mark outgoing packets iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp -s 192.168.1.23 -j MARK --set-mark $ip and this part of my script which is intented

Hi All: OK, this is probably a stupid thing to do but....... Say I have 706 controls and 6 treatments, and want to do a basic two-sample permutation test. I could do a monte carlo approximation but instead want to use perm.test. Now it happens that my data is counts with > unique(x) [1] 1 2 > unique(y) [1] 1 2 5 3 10 9 7 4 6 11 8 23 18 30 16 29 42 so there aren't that many

>> >>Good thing he doesn't work for a cable manufacturer as that's >>a total crock of crap that even an inexperienced person >>should be able to detect. (You can't twist two wires to make >>them weight three times as much, or cost three times as much.) He may have started out as an underground lineman, posibly inhaling too much swamp gas and CO from

I have what my SBC/ATT representative calls a "Supertrunk," but he can't tell me the specifics I need to know to configure Asterisk to work with it. By fiddling about, I've come up with the "almost working" configuration below. This works except that it takes about 4 seconds from when the console says the line is answered until it plays my prompt. Watching the

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927 Summary: segmentation fault in NVUploadToScreen, called from exaPutImage Product: xorg Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

I'm not 'overly' new to asterisk, but I am very new to the Digium card / Telco aspect of it. I was able to get a TE110p card, installed.. and hooked a t1 up to it. I'm using zttool to just look at 'some' output. Here is what it looks like when I just load it up: Current Alarms: No alarms. ? ? ? ? Sync Source:

Dear all, For my package "ref" I have implemented extensive regression testing. It now fails to compile since primitives "dim" and "dimnames" (and their assignment methods) no longer allow for additional arguments. I was using an additional argument "ref" with several methods. For "].refdata" it still works, with "dim.refdata" no longer.

[[this bounced first, because it has 'help' in the Subject line ... -- Martin Maechler ]] I am a complete novice R programmer. (Though I know C quite well) I am trying to write some R code to do the following simulation. There is a 2-frame "movie" of noise and signal dots. the noise dots have random positions in each frame. The signal dots are placed randomly in frame 1,

In my * server I have a T100P, connected with a T1 crossover cable to an Adtran TA750 with 2 FXO cards. After I do 'modprobe wct1xxp;ztcfg' the alarm on the card starts blinking red. Running zttool confirmed that yes, it is a red alarm. I've read a few previous posts on this type of setup and I'm not too much closer. What should I be checking next? A different cable? The

----- Original Message ----- From: Michał Joachimiak To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 3:45 PM Subject: HTB - Really Big problem Hello everybody! Since week i dig lists and www and can''t find solution for my problem. I''m using HTB 3.13 kernel 2-4-25 smp iptables 1.2.9. I''ve got situation like this: LAN------Linux Box(routing only)------- Linux

Dear R users, I have a linear model of the kind outcome ~ treatment + covariate where 'treatment' is a factor with three levels ("0", "1", and "2"), and the covariate is continuous. Treatments "1" and "2" both have regression coefficients significantly different from 0 when using treatment contrasts with treatment "0" as the

All, I''m trying to figure out the best way to estimate the amount of memory usage that will be taken up by Mongrel and I''m hoping that you have some estimates that can help me. I''m currently estimating the following: Memory Required = Number of running puppetmasters * size of manifests * number of clients managed The mongrel model doesn''t seem to *ever*