similar to: Yet again: chan_zap.c: Unable to specify channel 4: No such device

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Yet again: chan_zap.c: Unable to specify channel 4: No such device"

2006 May 16
6
Netherlands zaptel.conf
Hello, I have configured my TDM01B Card (1 FXO Port ) as follows (below) but it will not pick up an incoming call. Any suggestions/tools to see what the problem is? I have looked at zttool where this line changes but I don't understand what it means (The last digit changed from 0 to 1) Total/Conf/Act: 4/ 1/ 1 /etc/zaptel.conf fxsks=4 loadzone=nl defaultzone=nl
2006 Apr 04
6
Loading module chan_zap.so failed! PLZ help me!
Hi, I' ve just connected a carte X100M to my asterisk server running zaptel-1.2.5, libpri-1.2.2 and asterisk-1.2.6 on SUSE 10.0. When I make modprobe wcfxo and modprobe zaptel I haven't any error, I have also chan_zap.so module existing in /usr/lib/asterisk/modules. But, when i run ztcfg, it shows me this: Zaptel Configuration ====================== Channel map: 0 channels configured.
2006 Mar 13
1
Cannot load wcfxo -- Please help!
I'm afraid that I am at a loss here. I am new to Asterisk, and have successfully set up SIP. But I cannot get my FXS card working, and I'm not sure what else I can try. # modprobe wcfxo /lib/modules/2.4.21-37.0.1.ELsmp/misc/wcfxo.o: init_module: No such device Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. You may
2007 Jan 15
0
S110M (FXS) Modules no longer seen on TDM400P
I have a TDM21B (A new TDM20B that just arrived plus a X100M that I already had). This card sometimes works, and sometimes only the FXO module is seen. (correction to previous message that incorrectly listed X400M/S400M when I'm using only the single port versions of these modules (X100M/S110M). By "works", I mean all 3 modules have the green lights on the ports on and when
2007 Oct 21
3
WARNING: chan_zap.c process_zap: Ignoring signalling
Hello I've been googling for this message, but can't find why Asterisk sends a warning. The configuration files look similar to http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+config+zapata.conf.sample It's a TDM card with just one FXO module on it, and I connected an RJ11 cable to it from the wall plug: # cat /etc/zaptel.conf fxsks=1 loadzone=fr defaultzone=fr # ztcfg -vv
2008 Apr 14
4
Unable to load module chan_zap.so
I am having trouble with chan_zap.so not loading. When I load it from modules.conf, Asterisk bails out without any error message. When I load it from the console, it just says "Unable to load module chan_zap.so" no matter what verbose level I am using. dmesg says: Zaptel Version: 1.4.4 Zaptel Echo Canceller: MG2 Freshmaker version: 73 Freshmaker passed register test Module 0:
2007 Apr 23
3
chan_zap not compiling.
Hi all. chan_zap not compiling, yes yes I know this sounds trivial but here me out... This morning I decided to upgrade to Asterisk 1.4.2 and Zaptel 1.4.1. I successfully installed zaptel 1.4.1 and the card is picked up and correctly configured. ztcfg shows the following: [root@zion root]# ztcfg -vv Zaptel Version: 1.4.1 Echo Canceller: MG2 Configuration ====================== Channel
2007 May 21
1
CAS signalling conflicts with Clear channel
Hi, My asterisk server was working with a 4-FXO analog card (TDM400P). I recently added two digital cards: a TE120P (1 PRI) and a B410P (4 BRI). The B410P is still unconfigured but inserted in a PCI slot. The TE120P's jumper is set to E1 as it will connect to a commercial PBX's PRI card also configured as E1. My analog channels used to be 1-4 but since I added the new cards I changed
2009 Mar 10
4
chan_zap.so missing
Hello everyone! I installed Asterisk following the instructions of the book "Asterisk: The Future of Telephony". (very nice book) However, I failed. I installed zaptel, libpri and asterisk (in this order). The Installation of Zaptel is successful and my TDM400P is correctly detected: # zttool Alarms Span OK Wildcard S400P
2005 Aug 13
2
forward incoming analog call to SIP?
I'm trying to setup a demo where my Asterisk box with a TDM01B (FXO) answers an incoming call and forwards that call to a SIP softphone (X-lite.) Seems all is built/installed okay: # ztcfg -vv Zaptel Configuration ====================== Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) 1 channels configured. I'm pretty new at this and the extensions.conf file is eating my
2004 Aug 16
1
help with domain login please!
I think I have samba all configured properly, everything else is working I just cant log in to a computer on the domain with any user. I am getting the error message: [2004/08/16 21:12:45, 1] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:_net_sam_logon(713) _net_sam_logon: user DOMAIN.local\user has user sid S-1-5-21-1391849139-953726148-1374988380-3012 but group sid
2005 Sep 02
0
TDM400 w/ FXS S110M pinout on RJ11 connector?
Hi all, I just got my long awaited FXS modules for a TDM400 card, and was a bit puzzled about how my phones and the FXS interface worked together. Here goes: In Sweden (that's where I am located) phones traditionally are connected in daisy chain configuration. This means that a phone in on-hook condition passes the line through back onto the outer pair of the RJ11, back into the wall
2010 Nov 16
1
S110M not working
Hi All - I pulled from a working system a TDM400 with one s110 fxs and three x100 fxos. I put it into a new box and the fxs no longer works. The fxos work just fine. I thought it was odd, but I chalked it up to a random chance failure and ordered another s110. The replacement doesn't work either, and now I'm confused. dahdi_scan recognizes the s110, but it says it fails. Output
2005 Apr 11
1
plotting Principal components vs individual variables.
At the cost of breaking the thread I'm going to change your subject and replace 'Principle' by 'Principal'. I just can't stand it any longer... OK, here is how I would solve your other problems. First put > wh <- c("USA", "New Zealand", "Dominican Republic", "Western Samoa", "Cook Islands") > ind
2005 Apr 05
2
Principle Component Analysis in R
Dear R Should I be concerned if the loadings to a Principle Component Analysis are as follows: Loadings: Comp.1 Comp.2 Comp.3 Comp.4 X100m -0.500 0.558 0.661 X200m -0.508 0.379 0.362 -0.683 X400m -0.505 -0.274 -0.794 -0.197 X800m -0.486 -0.686 0.486 0.239 Comp.1 Comp.2 Comp.3 Comp.4 SS loadings 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Proportion Var 0.25 0.25 0.25
2005 Apr 11
0
plotting Principle components vs individual variables.
Dear R, I'm trying to plot the first principle component of an analysis vs the first variable but am having trouble. I have no trouble doing the initial plot but have difficulty thereafter. First I want to highlight some points of the following data set list(running) [[1]] X100m X200m X400m X800m X1500m X5K X10K Marathon Argentina 10.39 20.81 46.84 1.81
2017 Jul 19
1
[Bug 2745] New: [PATCH] add support for VersionAddendum to the client
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2745 Bug ID: 2745 Summary: [PATCH] add support for VersionAddendum to the client Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.5p1 Hardware: All OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee:
2010 Dec 01
1
attempted merge() returns: cannot coerce type 'closure' to vector of type 'any'
Hi Dimtris and esteemed useRs, I don't understand why i get this error message when attempting to use merge() - > temp <- merge(x, y[,17, drop=FALSE], by=rownames, sort=FALSE) Error in as.vector(x, mode) : cannot coerce type 'closure' to vector of type 'any' It should work because: > all(rownames(x[order(rownames(x)),]) == + rownames(y[order(rownames(y[,17,
2003 Nov 18
0
Unable to specify channel 2: Device or resource busy
Hi folks, I installed my Asterisk Developer's Kit (TDM) "successfully" on a old Dell machine and ending up with some problems. Running my start script . rmmod audio rmmod wcfxo rmmod zaptel modprobe wcfxo sleep 3 ztcfg -vvv sleep 1 asterisk -vvvvgc . ends in following problem: Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) Channel 02: FXO Kewlstart (Default)
2008 Apr 12
2
X100M never goes on-hook state
Hi guys, I've been experiencing a very strange issue with my Digium Card TDM400 as of this week. It has two FXS and two FXO. The FXO modules (both of them) never goes on-hook after hanging up in Asterisk. It had worked perfectly well for over four years. I put an ammeter in series with the line and the card, and immediately after plugging the connector to the card, I got 26mA in the circuit