similar to: MC

Is the there Plain Kernel for i586arch or I have to compile it form i386source. Best Regards Cooba

Hi, This is an initial implementation of a vhost-user backend for the VirtIO RPMB device. The device is currently in the draft of the next VirtIO specification and describes block device which uses combination of a key, nonce, hashing and a persistent write counter to prevent replay attacks (hence Replay Protected Memory Block). It is implemented as a vhost-user device because we want to

Hi, The specification lists a number of commands that have responses: The operation of a virtio RPMB device is driven by the requests placed on the virtqueue. The type of request can be program key (VIRTIO_RPMB_REQ_PROGRAM_KEY), get write counter (VIRTIO_RPMB_REQ_GET_WRITE_COUNTER), write (VIRTIO_RPMB_REQ_DATA_WRITE), and read (VIRTIO_RPMB_REQ_DATA_READ). A program key or write

Dear R-Core Team, I found an unexpected behaviour in utils::removeSource (also present in r-devel as of today). --- # create a function which accepts NULL argument foo <- function(x, y) { if (is.null(y)) y <- "default foo" attr(x, "foo") <- y x } # create a function which utilizes 'foo' testSrc <- function() { x <- 1:3 x <- foo(x,

I'm trying to install postfix-2.0.16-14.RHEL on a newly installed CentOS 3.3 boxen and I get the following error: Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:postfix ########################################### [100%] link /usr/share/man/man8/sendmail.8.gz incorrect for slave mta-sendmailman (/usr/share/man/man1/sendmail.1.gz

Question: If I use mock to build package rpmA from tarballA but rpmA has a dependency that can only be satisfied by package rpmB which must also be built from tarballB then how does the rpmB built from the tarballB get pulled into mock when building rpmA? I am trying to build httpd-2.4.7 from Apache and that needs apr-devel and apr-util-devel > 1.4. I can build apr and apr-utils in mock but

Several years ago, before PHP introduced their built-in pfpro functions, I rolled my own crappy interface, which of course delegated to the commandline payflow client. I could certainly do the same in Ruby today. Thinking back on it, I realized at the time, and realize again now, that delegating this functionality to a commandline app is a security risk unless you''re the *only* user on

Today I have changed my DSL modem and problems with postfix begun. It receives mail, but cannot send any. In logs I can read Jun 22 19:39:53 server postfix/smtp[5040]: 9A51711FF85: to=address at somedomain.com, relay=none, delay=12840, status=deferred (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=somedomain.com type=MX: Host not found, try again) My resolv.conf is proper. I can

Hi, as far as security advisories from Redhat I only see the last update to Postfix being 9/2/04 2.0.16-14.RHEL3. Centos3.3 however added a newer version that I am currently using which matches the last 2.0 version official release at postfix.org. /pub/cAos/centos-3/3.3/contrib/i386/RPMS/ postfix-2.0.20-1.centos3.1 Since I am running this as my public smtp server it makes me wonder why Redhat

yum was unable to find and install netatalk, so i used RH9 package. It successfully installed, but didn't started. Dmesg showed me that some module is missing. I pressume I will need to compile new kernel, right ? Best Regards Kuba

Probably missing something obvious here, but what determines when an RPM is built with a .c0 extension vs. not? Seems to be mostly on kernel RPM's. Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050122/12adf421/attachment-0003.html>

Hi Folks, I have some users who have a 64-bit CentOS 4.x install (current), which was installed with @Everything and then some annoying packages strategically removed (mrtg, pegasus*, mailman...) and they have decided they have a need for php5. I find on the web this instruction for doing this: http://www.centos.org/centos/4/centosplus/Readme.txt So I try to do this, and I get: # rpm -e

Harald Mommer <hmo at opensynergy.com> writes: > Hello, > > I had my hands in a virtio RPMB device implementation the last few > weeks. During the development process I had to apply some patches to the > virtio RPMB driver: > > * Change the device id from 0xFFFF to 28 > > * (Add some debug facilities. Needed to see the frames. Got first no > request

Joakim Bech <joakim.bech at linaro.org> writes: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 01:51:43PM +0100, Alex Benn?e wrote: >> With this command we are finally updating data to the backing store >> and cycling the write_count and each successful write. We also include >> the write count in all response frames as the spec is a little unclear >> but the example test code

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Centos] is centos3.1 compatible with dag's el3 repo? Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:15:22 +0200 From: sophana <sophana78 at yahoo.fr> To: Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com> References: <412B3E8B.7020805 at yahoo.fr> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0408241519120.6016 at horsea.3ti.be> Dag Wieers wrote: >Correct me if I'm wrong, but

Over the weekend my workstation (still on CentOS 3) started showing SMART errors, so we shut it down and moved everything onto a new drive. On reboot, the RPM database reports as corrupted and "rpm --rebuilddb" segmentation faults. Is there any reasonable way to recover from this, short of a complete reinstall? The machine is otherwise up though it''s quite likely some files

Hi All What is the major difference between version 3 and 3.1? Is there any incompatibilities for rpms? For example I wish to install evms from dag's repo. Is there any problem? Thanks for your great job.

Just curious, haven't seen much discussion on this or anything in the news page. Is U3 being built yet ? Might we expect to see a test release sometime soon ? -- Beau Henderson JustManaged.com - Affordable Linux Administration & Security Services.

Hi I just tried to install centos3.1 from the 3cd. I removed all existing partitions and made a custom partitionning: a /boot partition /dev/hda1 and a lvm physical volume for the rest: /dev/hda2 in the lvm volume group I placed all other partitions including root (/) The anaconda crashed because of an error in lvcreate for the root partition. Is there a problem with that? I did reboot and

Hi, Is there any way to store HostKey in hardware (and delegate the related processing)? I have been using Roumen Petrov's x509 patch for clients, which works via an OpenSSL engine, but it does not seem to support server HostKey: http://roumenpetrov.info/pipermail/ssh_x509_roumenpetrov.info/2012q4/000019.html For PKCS#11, I have found an email on this list from a year back suggesting this