similar to: Netatalk

I'm running CentOS 4 with Blue Quartz on a white box, and having problems with installing Portsentry vi the .tar.gz route. Various errors, etc. Anyone here know of a source, like an RPM or something, for Portsentry for CentOS? ... or a similar app? thnx, Manny

I'm reading the wiki et el. regarding indexes, but can't come up with a coherent answer to the setup and what will happen. I want to take the indexes and move them off of NFS (~/Maildir) and place in /var/spool/dovecot/indexes, but not have to hand create everything (user homes, mail folders) So, I create a parent folder /var/spool/dovecot/indexes that has the appropriate permissions

I have installed proftpd on a new x86_64 server: [root at ftp ~]# uname -a Linux ftp.csdsinc.com 2.6.9-22.0.1.ELsmp #1 SMP Thu Oct 27 14:49:37 CDT 2005 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux CentOS release 4.2 (Final) Proftpd Ver: [root at ftp ~]# rpm -q proftpd proftpd-1.2.10-8.2.el4.rf Selinux is disabled Modified debug file excerpt: xxx.xxxxx.com - ProFTPD 1.2.10 (stable) (built Fri Feb 18

Take a look at this output from lsof: smbd 11490 0 8u REG 3,3 55296 1136647 Maintenanc.fp5 afpd 31010 0 2u REG 3,3 3207 1136655 auction - envelope.rtf afpd 31010 0 5u REG 3,3 4156 1136656 Word Work File L 1 afpd 31010 0 8u REG 3,3 55296 1136647 Maintenanc.fp5 smbd 31386 0 9u REG 3,3 4156 1136656 Word Work

Hi all, Looking for a "best practices" way to share out to both Mac and PC easily. I know Windoze enables the same sharepoint for both the mac and pc shares and there don't seem to be any real "problems" by doing that. However I work in an environment which forces us to utilize Win9x through XP as well as OS 9 through 10.x on the mac side. I need a user friendly way to

since "ea = samba" was only added to very recent netatalk versions and so don't apply to files with a history of many years what is the way to go get rid of netatalk these days? is there still no tool to read/write the existing netatalk appladouble extended attributes which are *not* compatible with samba and write them back in the new format? afp.conf: appledouble = ea ea = samba

I recently took over a x86_64 CentOS 4.0 server running an "unsupported" kernel. On examining the box it seems that perhaps it is because of the use of xfs and netatalk. I would like to update the box to 4.3. I think I can do away with the netatalk, but doing away with xfs would require a substantial amount of work. Questions: 1: In reading the archive of this list there was a post

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:49:11PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > > > Am 17.05.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:44:12PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > >> Am 17.05.2018 um 14:22 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > >>> iirc the only thing that is currently not working is cross-protocol xattrs for > >>> xattrs

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > > > Am 17.05.2018 um 16:56 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:49:11PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > >> > >> Am 17.05.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > >>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:44:12PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: >

Hello, Anyone out there running a production network supporting PC and Macintosh clients using samba and netatalk. we are currently using NT 4.0 with AppleTalk-IP software. Sharing the same files with the Macs and the pc is a must. I read someplace that samba 2.2.2 supports Appletalk. Is this true? Thanks, Joe

On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 02:33:10AM +0900, HAT wrote: > Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:22:56 +0000, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > > On 26/12/15 17:08, HAT wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I'm testing samba 4.3.3 vfs_fruit on Fedora rawhide. > >> > >> The EAs are not seen from clients yet. > >> > >> smb.conf: > >> path =

Hi. I'm testing samba 4.2.0 vfs_fruit on Fedora Server 22-alpha. I confirmed that ResourceFork and FinderInfo are compatible with Netatalk 3.1.7. However, EAs are incompatible. The character ":" in EA name is wrong. The EAs are not seen from clients. smb.conf: [test2] path = /export/test2 writable = yes vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr fruit:locking =

Today I have changed my DSL modem and problems with postfix begun. It receives mail, but cannot send any. In logs I can read Jun 22 19:39:53 server postfix/smtp[5040]: 9A51711FF85: to=address at somedomain.com, relay=none, delay=12840, status=deferred (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=somedomain.com type=MX: Host not found, try again) My resolv.conf is proper. I can

Hi, I've got a SuSE 9.0 running Samba 3.0.1 and Netatalk 1.6.3 Samba is a member server of a win2k domain, I'm using winbind to authnticate my users. Well, with the Windows users, everything is ok. But not with the Mac users I'd like to setup Netatalk to authenticate my Macs against the win2k domain as with Windows. Is this possible? I've sarched the web all around and

Hi all, I'm have a Linux Box running samba and netatalk, and a file system shared with Mac and Windows users. My problem is that when a user in Windows delete a file that have a Macintosh label (color), and later the Windows user put another version of the file with the same name, the Macintosh label still apear (and this is not the behavior that i need). I view in the file system that

Hi folks, is anybody using those two products together and can give me any advice on how to do this? My specific issue has been addressed in other posts before, but as nobody responded, it would just now be interesting if anybody at least uses those applications together successfully? greets Malte

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 01:14:25AM +0900, HAT wrote: > Hi, > > >> not sure, but the colon in xattr names is probably not handled > >> correctly at this point. Can you please file a bugreport so we can > >> track this? > > > > Bug 11162 > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11162 > > I tested samba 4.3.1 on Fedora 23 and rawhide.

Build team -- what's our current outlook on the 4 Final release shaping up to be (ie, this week, next week, a month..)? Should it be further out, would it be relatively painless to 'upgrade' (so to speak) from the current RC1 to Final when it rolls around? thanks! -te (I have a new project server waiting in limbo, would like to at least get started - nonproduction) -- Troy

On 26/12/15 17:08, HAT wrote: > Hi, > I'm testing samba 4.3.3 vfs_fruit on Fedora rawhide. > > The EAs are not seen from clients yet. > > smb.conf: > path = /export/test1/ > writable = yes > vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr > fruit:locking = netatalk > fruit:encoding = native > streams_xattr:prefix = user.

Client: Dual 1GHz G4 OSX 10.2 Gig-Ethernet Server: Dual 2GHz P4 Linux 2.4.18 Raid-5 1TB Gig-Ethernet With netatalk 1.5.5 I get sustained writes of 66MB/s (yes, megabytes) With samba 2.2.7a I get sustained writes of 15MB/s I've tweaked the settings and ended up with these: socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE read raw =