similar to: Moving from WhiteBox to CentOS 3.1

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Moving from WhiteBox to CentOS 3.1"

2004 Jun 17
1
Comming from WhiteBox Linux ...
Hello several months ago I install WhiteBox Linux on several severs, I was happy, not woriing about upgrading every 1,5 year as when I use RH 4.0, 6.0, 7.3, 9.0 .... And then WhiteBox went black, WBEL updates release slowed down and maintainer wont help form anybody. Just telling "If you want quick updates, build it yourself.". I prefer wasting time for customizations and/or
2005 Oct 12
3
Wherefore whitebox?
Well, I'm a recent convert from WBEL. My biggest concern with CentOS is that the community here seems to want to be more than a recompile of RHEL. But WBEL is floundering, what with Katrina and Rita, and there really being only 1 developer behind it, etc. I offer an automated shell script to switch from WBEL4 to CentOS4 (easy, it's hosted on my home DSL line!) It assumes that
2004 Jun 18
0
Re: NVIDIA on Linux: less is more
Aaron, > It is a kernel problem. The stack size changed in > the 2.6 kernel. You > need a version of the kernel with the old 8k stack > size. You can get > such a kernel from: > www.linuxant.com/driverloader/wlan/full/downloads-fc2-kernel-i686.php > > As you can see these are fedora kernels but might > work on centos. Actually, while troubleshooting this display
2005 Oct 07
2
WhiteBox 4 -> CentOS4.1 - Yum
Hi Is it possible to swap the yum.conf from my centos box onto my whitebox box and have the whitebox machine use centos updates through yum? CentOS seems further ahead and far quicker at roll outs than whitebox? thanks
2004 Oct 13
3
Possible new CentOS user (currently WBEL)
Hi, For a few months i've been using WhiteBox Enterprise Linux. In fact, i've migrated all my companie's servers (about 20) to this RHEL distro like. Well, it's not that i'm not satisfied, but WBEL is a one man show and that causes me some preocupation. And besides, it seems to me that it can't stand up to the rythm RHEL evolves. That's why i'm writing to you,
2004 Oct 27
1
[Fwd: Re: Release of centos-3.3 ISP bill]
-------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Petr \"Qaxi\" Klima" <qaxi at seznam.cz> Subject: Re: [Centos] Release of centos-3.3 ISP bill Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:56:24 +0200 Size: 2686 URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20041027/6185ecd0/attachment-0003.mht>
2005 Jun 22
5
Centos 3 - yum update error (rpm-libs)
Hello *, i get following error: Downloading needed headers Resolving dependencies .....Unable to satisfy dependencies Package rpm-libs needs rpm = 4.2.3-13.WB2, this is not available. I switch from WhiteBox to Centos. How can resolve this problem?
2005 Sep 26
2
C4 - mod_authz_ldap - weird behavoir
hi I have problem with mod_authz_ldap with this setup: <Directory /var/www/html/weby_2005> AuthzLDAPServer "ldap:389" AuthzLDAPUserBase dc=group,dc=cz AuthzLDAPBindDN uid=ds,ou=People,dc=group,dc=cz AuthzLDAPBindPassword XXXXX AuthzLDAPUserKey uid AuthzLDAPUserScope subtree AuthzLDAPLogLevel debug # needed for user auth
2006 Jun 17
4
64-bit ISO Burning Failures
Hi, I have downloaded several different sets of the 64-bit ISOs, and have burned them to CD using various of my known-good ISO burning softwares, including Nero and DeepBurn on Windows, as well as the native CD burning KDE linux tool on Xandros Linux. I am using mirrors from the site, like kernel.org. I have chosen low burning speeds also, but when I insert the ISO CD into a server and boot it
2006 May 02
4
Migrate from RHAS 4 to CentOS 4.2
I have a SGI Altix 350 (ia64) that came with RHAS 4, but without any paid support. I would like to migrate the server over to CentOS. Here is what I've pieced together from some older posts by Johnny, can someone confirm this should work? I know this is somewhat covered in the FAQ, although both entries refer to FC or WBEL, which already have built-in yum support. Install the
2004 Nov 30
3
Low end systems
Hi All I been using whitebox 3 for a bit and am take a look at cent 3.3 and 3.1 so far like it, but i seeing with older system 200 to 800 not Intel system (amd k6/2) ( not all of them ) cent comes back in install and till me that its not made for system like this ... whitebox 3 works OK so I'm not sure why and if a can get around this .... See BUG. "That's not a bug,
2006 Jan 26
2
Using Centos
We need to resell systems that run commercial software on Linux. We were using Red Hat ES 3 originally. But we later realize that we cannot redistribute RHES without paying them huge subscription fee because of the trademark. I came across CentOS from WBEL mailing list. This looks like a godsend to me. I have some questions regarding CentOS. I would appreciate it if someone can provide me the
2005 Apr 08
1
Why EPOCH ?
Hello Does anybody know why is there so much packages with EPOCH cca? What is it good for? Petr Klima
2009 Feb 10
1
Upgrade samba from 3.28 to 3.29 to fix winbind issue.
How do you upgrade samba from 3.0.28 to 3.0.29 to fix winbind issue? My OS is CentOS 4.5. I haven't been able to find a RPM above 3.0.28. for samba. I backed all of the files that I needed and removed the RPM's for 3.28 and installed 3.0.33 doing a ./configure, make, make install and was hoping to reconfigure all the data but the smb service was not where to be found I even rebooted the
2005 Oct 13
2
Newbie Questions
Recent convert from WhiteBox, a few questions What is the difference between CentOS 4.2 and "4"? Is this like the Whitebox "respin"? Are updates/packages for 4.2 applicable across all the "4" series of releases? -Ben -- "The best way to predict the future is to invent it." - XEROX PARC slogan, circa 1978
2007 May 31
2
redhat / whitebox
Hi all Can you tell me what is the different between fedora / redhat enterprise / centos and whitebox? Thank you ____________________________________________________________________________________ 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news
2005 Oct 31
1
Moving from whitebox 4.2 to centos
I've been following the faq for moving from whitebox to centos (which admittedly is for release 3, but using the equivalent release 4 files) and keep getting stuck when installing the centos-release-4-2.1 rpm which says it should replace whitebox-release4.2 However this is not happening, giving me the following rpm -Uvh
2006 Nov 09
1
Poblem with Centos Logos on X bootup...conversion from whitebox to centos.
Hello all I migrated my Centos installation from a whitebox install few months ago. Only one minor issue...on booting up X, the login screen shows whitebox logos. At that time, I did not tackle it because I assumed that it will automatically be upgraded with yum...and again it was not essential to running the OS. What whitebox rpms do I need to substitute with centos ones to correct this
2005 May 03
5
CentOS 4 - problem with remote X application
Hello i have a problem on CentOS 4 with starting remote x application on remote CentOS 3 od Solaris 9 boxes. The problem is: When I run it from CentOS 3 it's OK form CentOS 4 I cannot find a bad word in logs ... My local machine stoping firewall [root at klima-pc ~]# service iptables stop [root at klima-pc ~]# iptables-save [root at klima-pc ~]# SELinux is OFF I am connecting by ssh
2004 Sep 21
1
Centos-3.3 i386 CDs
Hi Just wondering why there are two diferent version of file comps #ll iso/mnt-cd1/RedHat/RPMS/comps-3.0.0centos-0.20040916.i386.rpm -r--r--r-- 1 root root 6821992 Sep 16 19:11 iso/mnt-cd1/RedHat/RPMS/comps-3.0.0centos-0.20040916.i386.rpm #ll iso/mnt-cd3/RedHat/RPMS/comps-3.0.0centos-0.20040916.i386.rpm -r--r--r-- 2 root root 6809965 Sep 16 18:52