similar to: Re: more about messing around with iptables

Hello all, I am messing around with iptables, trying to learn how it works so that I can build my self a router/firewall and mabey a VPN. Anyway I tried to use a command on my Desktop CentOS3 machine. "iptables -A INPUT -s 127.0.0.1 -p icmp -j DROP" now the command seems to have went through because I didn't get any errors, but when I go to ping 127.0.0.1 I am getting a response

Hello scty library, I had huge problems with NVIDIA cards on Linux. The screen would go blank as soon as X tried to load. I only tried using the driver that came with CentOS. After lots of parts swapping, I found that the monitor (obviously) and (even) the motherboard make a difference. > If so what did you do about it. Finally, I gave up on NVIDIA cards -- I got a Voodoo Banshee

Aaron, > It is a kernel problem. The stack size changed in > the 2.6 kernel. You > need a version of the kernel with the old 8k stack > size. You can get > such a kernel from: > www.linuxant.com/driverloader/wlan/full/downloads-fc2-kernel-i686.php > > As you can see these are fedora kernels but might > work on centos. Actually, while troubleshooting this display

glusterd.vol file is default installed with glusterfs package. So I'm not sure how did you end up into a state where this file was missing (as per my initial investigation looking at the logs). What you could do to check if this file is really missing or not by running "find / -iname glusterd.vol" and if it's indeed missing then copy it from one of the peer node and restart

[ Please would anyone replying to this maintain the Cc list here as my dear colleague is not subscribed to this mailing list. ] Hello all, I am trying to track down an oddity with winbindd. We're using samba only to join a given domain -- so the config file is very minimal, as per: [global] workgroup = TEDDYBEARS netbios name = SMOOTHWALL realm = TEDDYBEARS.LOCAL security = ads

I''m getting the following error/warning at some point in my config script, and I''m not sure which class it is referring to. htb: class 10007 isn''t work conserving ?! I [think I] understand that htb is a non-work-conserving qdisc, and I [think I] have configured things so that every htb qdisc I instantiate limits the bandwidth, so I don''t understand why this

I''m running 2.6.7 + (julian''s multi-path patch) + IMQ (imq2+beta6) and I got the following on my console while doing some stress testing: KERNEL: assertion (tp->retrans_out == 0) failed at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (1827) I don''t know what I would do to try to reproduce this condition; it only appeared once. tcp_input.c sounds deep enough to scare me off from looking

I''m sure that I had found (and printed out ...) a really good tutorial that explain how to use Julian Anastasov''s routing patch, but I can''t seem to find it now. Any pointers? -- ****************************************************************** Glen W. Mabey Glen.Mabey@usu.edu http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/

On 3/27/2017 10:20 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: > That reminded me about Smoothwall I used to use a few years back. > Wasn't pfsense related to Smoothwall, maybe even a fork? smoothwall is linux based. m0n0wall was a BSD firewall that pfSense forked from back in 2004. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

I'm trying to modify the typical Squid/ntlm_auth/winbindd arrangement to support authenticating to multiple independent domains. I have a prototype solution but would like to know if it would work in the general case. (I used http://davenport.sourceforge.net/ntlm.html as a reference for the NTLM protocol.) In the prototype I have multiple instances of winbindd and ntlm_auth with a

I have a network with RH7.2 (netbois name "server"), Mandrake 8.1 ("Linuxbox"), Smoothwall ("Smoothwall"), WinNT ("di-bosco"), Win 98 ("robertw" & "Nicole") x 2 and Win 2k ("DiBosco2k"). Smoothwall is the DHCP server. Why would it be that all the Windows machines can ping to a netbios name, eg ping server, ping Linuxbox

In theory, you can run GlusterFS on a Synology box, as it is "just a Linux box". In practice, you might be the first person to ever try it. On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Ben Mabey <ben.mabey at recursionpharma.com> wrote: > Hi, > Does anyone have any experience of using Synology NAS servers as bricks in > a gluster setup? The ops team at my work prefers Synology

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Alex Chekholko <alex at calicolabs.com> wrote: > In theory, you can run GlusterFS on a Synology box, as it is "just a Linux > box". In practice, you might be the first person to ever try it. > Not sure if this would be the first attempt. Synology seems to bundle glusterfs in some form [1]. Regards, Vijay [1]

At the list archive page (http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/) there is an amazing message from the future: the year 2032 (q1). Not that I know anything about mailman, but someone might want to "maintain" that. -- ****************************************************************** Glen W. Mabey Glen.Mabey@usu.edu http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/

Hi I am using ext3 on Smoothwall Express 2 firewall, which I understand is based originally off Red Hat. The machine runs headless, without a monitor. On one ocassion booting stopped, hooking up a monitor revealed this, -- console output -- /dev/harddisk4 has been mounted 29 times without being checked, check forced. /dev/harddisk4: Optimizing directories: 47165 140835 /dev/harddisk4: *****

Considering you use mozilla-thunderbird 0.7. I suggest you try using the spell check facility. It might make your message understandable, and why run Tbird with Wine.? Good luck with your new mailing list. BTW smoothwall is a firewall. Richard ....................................... for ur info MT07 is on a diff os ok .. 2nd u prove what kind of folks live on this board .. ones not needed ....

I have a Smoothwall server on my network and am running three network interfaces off it. 1) local LAN 192.168.0.0 with PCs and an internal dovecot server on 192.168.0.154. 2) internet interface 3) DMZ 192.168.2.0 which has a linux web server 192.168.2.1 on which I want to install a webmail so I can access my email remotely. Originally 192.168.2.1 couldn't see the 192.168.0.0 network but with

FYI this topic has been covered on the Zebra and Quagga lists - hardware processors, memory, NICs, etc - software OS (Linux, *BSD), drivers, etc I''ve been running a couple of Linux routers for about 2 years now, I''m using them as core routers so I bought a couple of rackmount "server" boxes with redundant PSUs and h/w RAID (1) for hotswap disks. I''m using

> Hello all. > > I have a problem since months with my CentOS 4 webserver. It came up since > I intalled it. > The SSL pages are very slow. Typically, I get 2-3 thumbnails from an SSL > page, and then nothing during 7 seconds, and then again 2 thumbnails, > nothing again, etc.. and so forth during about 30 seconds after what all > non loaded images are just discarded

> Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 14:44:26 -0700 > From: Nicholas Erkert <nick@erkert.com> > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Subject: Re: [LARTC] the "cisco vs. Linux" thread > > Glen Mabey wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:07:57PM -0400, Jos? Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote: >>> >> >>>>>you can use an Athlon