similar to: Re: more about nVIDIA on Linux^h^h^h^h^h RedHat

Hello all. I have the same problem as described by Dmitry a day ago in a topic similar. I am able to use x11 with base driver "nv" but when I load "nvidia" driver, startx simply crash my machine and reboot after 5 seconds. I have a similar log file as reported by Dmitry even using startx+logverbose option. XF86Config file is similar,except it is not the same nvidia video

Hi! I just setup my ati radeon 9500 with fglrxconfig from the ati 3.7 drivers on a 2.6 kernel. I use primary a monitor and configured the x config file to use the tv as a second monitor which uses a different driver (graphic device section) due to different resolutions. All works pretty perfect, except for wine. No matter what i start in wine, my primary monitor blanks out while the tv keeps on

In the vein of the "Can't get resolution higher than 1280x1024" and "Another CentOS 5 oddity..." threads, I just installed CentOS5 w/Xen kernel on a Sony VAIO desktop with an nVidia NV5M64 (RIVA TNT2 64 Pro) card, using an old Samsung SyncMaster 700NF monitor. system-config-display chose the highest possible resolution for the monitor and Xorg did its best to drive it, but

Hey, I tried it. The short answer is that nVIDIA cards are OK for text, but may not work at all under X. I downloaded the 3.3 ISO's, and burned new CD's. I did an X desktop install on a test bench P3 600 MHz system with a 4.3 gig drive. I did the install with a known-to-work Voodoo Banshee card to get the system going. I used a Mag DX1495 monitor, which I know does not to work on

I am having some issues (e.g. System lock ups) with my ATI 9250 Video card. I am thinging about replacing it with either a Nvidia FX5200, FX5500, or a FX5600 card. Is anyone using one of these cards on Centos 4.1 with the stock (XORG) nv driver? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I originally set up this monitor with an analogue lead. Everything seemed fine, so I didn't check xorg.conf at all. Then I bought a digital lead, and since then the monitor blinks. Running system-config-display identifies it as a 1280 x 1084 CRT monitor. It is an LCD monitor. That model is not on the drop-down list, so assuming that a specific driver wasn't available for it, I

I have had my "nv" driver lock up a number of times. I downloaded the "nvidia" drivers and they did not work at 1920x1080 resolution. I am looking for an updated driver for just "nv". I found some once for a different driver that you just update commonXXX and yourdriverXXX not the whole X recompile. Where can I find those drivers? THanks, Jerry --------------

Hi, I tried applying http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/drm-stable-20030411.diff to stable from today (using device radeondrm and options DRM_LINUX). Kernel reports drm seems to be there: drm0: <ATI Radeon QY RV100 VE> port 0x9000-0x90ff mem 0xed000000-0xed00ffff,0xe$ info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.8.0 20020828 on minor 0 Now, when I try to start XFree86 everything looks fine

HELO, My old CRT is a bit broken so I decided to buy new screen. I d like to get an LCD monitor. I also use FreeBSD , X ver.4.2 server and GNOME 2.2. And now my question: Do I have to setup my X for that monitor, or maybe just change name, vendor, refresh modes in my XF86Config ? I am not going to use DVI.... thanks for help MArek

Listmates (only posting to one list) Compiz has been running great with the 8.433 driver except for the libGL SONAME lockup on exit. see: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=344135 I just built and installed the 8.452 driver. Compiz would not start with the normal fusion-icon approach that I have been using with the 8.433 driver. This is on my Toshiba P35 laptop with an ATI

Hi, Did anyone manage to get 4.4 working on a Dell D620 laptop? The thing has a 1440x900 LCD screen, but I don't get X the work with that resolution. (lspci: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)) Google suggested to use '915resolution', which I installed (915resolution-0.5.2-1.el4.rf), but that doesn't help. Regards, --

On 05/07/2017 11:12 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Sampsa Riikonen <sampsa.riikonen at iki.fi> wrote: >> Dear Devs, >> >> We have achieved a desktop of up to six monitors, with openGL running >> succesfully on the desktop, with the following setup/features: >> >> * Ubuntu 16+ >> * Xrandr >> * Noveau driver >>

Hi all, Up until today everything has been fine with CentOS on my Toshiba laptop. I booted into CentOS 4.3 today and Kudzu detected my video card for some reason. I let it configure it (wish I hadn't now). I can still get in. X and Gnome work. But the video resolution is 800x640. The LCD is capable of 1024x768. I cannot change it using Gnome tools or direct editing of

Hello scty library, I had huge problems with NVIDIA cards on Linux. The screen would go blank as soon as X tried to load. I only tried using the driver that came with CentOS. After lots of parts swapping, I found that the monitor (obviously) and (even) the motherboard make a difference. > If so what did you do about it. Finally, I gave up on NVIDIA cards -- I got a Voodoo Banshee

I asked on the Gentoo forums, and surprisingly haven't gotten an answer. When I run xrandr, I get this output: Code: Screen 0: minimum 2960 x 1050, current 2960 x 1050, maximum 2960 x 1050 default connected 2960x1050+0+0 0mm x 0mm 2960x1050 50.0* I'm using TwinView with a 1680x1050 monitor and a 1280x1024 monitor. And I want to set up some different modes in xrandr. When

I have a user who wants to have 4 monitors attached to his CentOS 6.4 system. I know that you can't use both on-board video and a PCI video card at the same time, but what about two PCI video cards? The system seems to recognize them as shown by the lspci -v output below, but I can't get Xorg to use the second card. Has anyone done this? If so, what is the trick to get it to work?

Hello. I'm running WoW 2.3.3, my wine version is wine-0.9.56. My PC: 512 ram, Athlon 300+ and ATI radeon 600x. Problem: 4pfs under Arch Linux and up to 12 under Ubuntu. Drivers: Fglrx (catalyst-8.3-1) Rendering: Yes Code: glxinfo |grep direct direct rendering: Yes fglrxinfo display: :0.0 screen: 0 OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc. OpenGL renderer string: RADEON X600/X550 Series

My OQO has a VIA chipset. From the hwconf: class: VIDEO bus: PCI detached: 0 desc: "VIA Technologies, Inc. CX700M2 UniChrome PRO II Graphics" vendorId: 1106 deviceId: 3157 subVendorId: 1106 subDeviceId: 3157 pciType: 1 pcidom: 0 pcibus: 1 pcidev: 0 pcifn: 0 When I install Centos, I default to the vesa driver, and it operates at the monitor's native 800x480. Of course I

I am attempting to setup a dell inspirons 1200 laptop media accelerator 900 from intel is the chipset so I am using the i810 driver. In the default 1024x768 everything is fine. I am trying to setup the external port not the LCD to be 1366x768. I added a modeline to xorg.conf of: Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "Monitor Vendor"

I've fairly recently changed my Linux desktop, and now use a XFree86 server. The default X11() window is rather small: it is supposed to be 7" x 7". However, 1) It is actually just over 5" x 5" and 2) 7" x 7" would be rather small on a 21" screen. The reason for 1) is that DisplayWidthMM give 542mm, when it is really close to 400mm (and the correct