similar to: Asterisk 1.2.1 + TDM400P + fax machine unreliable ?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "Asterisk 1.2.1 + TDM400P + fax machine unreliable ?"

2005 Sep 12
1
chan_zap.c:8050 pri_dchannel: Ring requested on unconfigured channel 255/255 span 2
I have a serious problem that repeats very often, after 30 - 50 calls and I can only solve it by stopped and restarting * :-( After a while, * seems to loose track of something. When an ISDN call from PBX needs to go to the Telco, I get 'Ring requested on unconfigured channel 255/255 span 2' It's always channel 255/255 ??, the 'span' number is random Setup: * between Local
2005 Oct 12
3
E400P vs te410p vs te411p
Hi, I found E400P quad PRI card quite cheap (749USD): http://www.govarion.com/product_info.php?cPath=1&products_id=2&osCsid=68cdd6e3d08754 in comparison to te410p (approx 1500 USD ) http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=product_detail&category=hardware&product=TE410P Now newer generation with HW echo canceling emerged (te411p). I'm not sure in what things those two cards
2005 Sep 08
1
pri gateway
hello, i installed an asterisk as a pri gateway. Everything is okay. /etc/init.d/zaptel starts successfull with wct4xxp module. /etc/init.d/asterisk starts also successfully. I tested my pri cable and it works. But still my span isn't up. I don't see any error. Do you have any idea? What else i should check? Thanks. My card is 4 span Wildcard TE410P
2005 Jul 07
3
Newbie Question: Type of card
Hi, I am sorta a newbie to the asterisk community at least in the realm of hardware types. I was wondering, what type of card is used to allow asterisk, on a slackware installation to talk to a standard phone line so that asterisk can call out? Dan
2005 Oct 04
2
Hardware vs. Network Inputs
We are trying to determine how to build out an IVR system we are working on. The system needs to be able to handle probably at most 5-10 concurrent calls at peak times. Other times we are just looking for a reliable service. For incoming calls we've been using BroadVoice VOIP and before that VoicePulse VOIP. VoicePulse's IAX service started dropping DTMF inputs that we were processing
2005 Jun 21
3
FXS
Em (20:59:21), Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion escreveu: >On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 08:09:52PM -0300, Alessandro wrote: >> >> Does Somebody know why no load modules to FXS? I used zaptel-1.0.7 >> version. > >What color are the modules? >Post your /etc/zaptel.conf > >-- >Mike Mike, The color is green, red ans bluw. Link
2005 Jun 22
4
FXS interfaces
Hi all, Does somebody know why no load modules to FXS? I used zaptel-1.0.7 version driver. [root@server1 zaptel-1.0.7]# modprobe wctdm ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 3: Invalid argument (22) Did you forget that FXS interfaces are configured with FXO signalling and that FXO interfaces use FXS signalling? /lib/modules/2.4.21-27.EL/misc/wcfxs.o: post-install wcfxs failed
2006 Feb 20
9
Multiple TDM400P's in a single machine
Hi All, Can someone give me a definite answer as to wether or not you can reliably run multiple TDM400P's in the same machine? I need 4 x FXO and 4 x FXS to connect to both the PSTN and existing key system, but I have seen several threads suggesting that this is not a supported configuration Thanks, Marc. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
2008 Jul 10
0
callerid_get_dtmf: Couldn't detect start-character. CID parsing might be unreliable
Hi list, My caller ID is not working anymore on my TDM11B (TDM400P) cards and i get this error message on the asterisk console: == Starting post polarity CID detection on channel 4 -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/4-1' [Jul 8 11:58:55] WARNING[9539]: callerid.c:219 callerid_get_dtmf: Couldn't detect start-character. CID parsing might be unreliable A long time ago my
2004 Sep 15
3
Cisco 79xx + asterisk + some functions Q
Hi, I am new to Asterisk and have some general questions _before_ I start buying equipent to install and get everything up-and-running. (this means I have no running Asterisk (yet)). I have read already a lot of doc, but some things are not clear to me, since I'am inexperienced in Asterisk and PBX. The goal: Make PBX using Asterisk and Cisco 79xx equipment for 25 phones (1 x 7970, 4 x 7960,
2009 Feb 17
0
Swift - detection of multiple digits unreliable on my system
Hi all, I just installed Cepstral and app_swift version 1.4.2 on my Asterisk 1.4.22.1 box. It seems to work great with one exception. If I play a test message with instructions to collect a maximum of 5 digits, it collects those 5 digits correctly if the user waits for the message to complete before entering them. But if the user barges in with digits before the message completes, the detected
2002 Nov 28
1
[LLVMdev] lli unreliable?
lli executed the bytecode corresponding to test_3.0_ml.ll without a failure, even though Function() is accessing an invalid memory address. The original code is in test_3.0.c, and the malloc() in Create() has been replaced by alloca() in test_3.0_ml.ll. I expected lli to segfault or similar when testing my code. Are my assumptions erroneous? -------------- next part --------------
2005 Jun 01
1
Unreliable DTMF detection with DISA on incoming Zap channel on bristuffed * and GSM gateway
Hi, I'm getting unusable DTMF detection with DISA on incoming ZAP channel (bristuffed *) on quadbri from GSM gateway. DTMF detection works ok in normal ISDN incoming line. How can I check what's going on ? What settings to check ? Anyone with more experience on such scenarios ? Thanks in advance, regards, Rob.
2005 Jun 21
1
GSM ISDN gateway to quadbri NT port under bristuffed Asterisk - where to set gain (I have unreliable inband dtmf recognition )?
Hi, I'm getting unreliable dtmf recognition (it works fine for 4-5 digits, errors (duplicates) on more), when transferred inband from gsm gateway to NT port of quadbri under bristuffed Asterisk..... Since Asterisk is claimed to have good dtmf recognizer, I suspect there are some settings to workarouned... I've tried dtmf relax, but didn't help, so I suspect gain settings.... Is
2006 Jan 19
0
AudioCodes Unreliable DTMF Detection
We're trying to use some AudioCodes MP104 FXO units as gateways to Asterisk but cannot get them to reliably detect DTMF. Some landline calls get most digits but some are duplicated. Some cell phone calls get 0% DTMF recognition. Anyone with experience with these units have any suggestions? ABP Technical Support has been unable to diagnose the problem and is now sending random guesses and
2007 Apr 26
0
IAX channel unreliable with multiple hops
Hi, My problem is related to a bug in the Asterisk bug database: (Bug 2773) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=2773 Essentially, when one has a call going over more than one IAX legs, the audio is not transferred *sometimes*. This is quite randomly observed. With "notransfer=yes", the problem goes away. In my situation, the IAX channels originate from 2 Asterisk servers themselves -
2004 Jan 07
1
[PATCH] Unreliable network connections with 3.0.1
A lot of people have complained about unreliable connections to W2K and XP machines. The folowing patch solved the problems for us. I have no idea why it works, but after this patch we had no more problems connecting to workstations in the domain. --- samba-3.0.2pre1/source/rpc_parse/parse_net.c 2004-01-06 22:08:41.000000000 +0100 +++ samba-3.0.2pre1/source/rpc_parse/parse_net.c 2004-01-07
2004 Feb 04
1
[PATCH] Unreliable network connections with 3.0.1 - need advice
Hi I saw your post about bug in Samba 3.0.1: Quote: ????A lot of people have complained about unreliable connections to W2K and XP machines. The folowing patch solved the problems for us. I have no idea why it works, but after this patch we had no more problems connecting to workstations in the domain. --- samba-3.0.2pre1/source/rpc_parse/parse_net.c 2004-01-06 22:08:41.000000000 +0100 +++
2004 Mar 06
0
Samba 3.0.2a + Win2K clients: unreliable share access
After upgrading from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2a, accessing a shared folder has become unreliable: after being able to access my shares for some time I get an error message "No domain contoller was available" (actually, I'm paraphrasing that one, I unfortunately did not record it verbatim). Host linux log contains the following error message for each access: Mar 5 20:07:08 sharesmb01
2019 Feb 02
0
linux rsync <-> SSHDroid has started becoming unreliable after an upgrade of Fedora 28 to 29
On Sun 03 Feb 2019, Philip Rhoades via rsync wrote: > > For some years I have been using rsync quite happily to send / retrieve > files to / from SSHDroid Pro but recently I have started having a problem > when transferring large numbers of file - I am pretty sure it started after > upgrading from Fedora x86_64 28 to 29 - but I am not 100% sure. Below is [...] > Corrupted MAC