similar to: 5,000 concurrent calls system rollout question

Isn't it ridiculous that Hammer charges an arm and a leg for any work they do. For systems as large as that one, we just setup a seperate one, connect them back to back and run automated script to burn it in. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of William Boehlke Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006

Why is using ulaw or alaw an unlikely scenario? I wouldn't use anything but ulaw\alaw. The Bells can compete on price and will if they have to. Where they CAN'T compete is quality. If there were something better than 711, I'd offer that. Well, there is 722, but not many things support it. ---- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original

I don't think they are doing it with one Asterisk box. They did say "one rack of servers". Well, that might mean up to 50 computers if they are using blade servers. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of John Todd Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 10:21 PM To:

Hi, I have problem with a Centos 5.3 computer. The networking is very slow. The networking card is a RealTek 1GigE. I plugged an Ubuntu laptop on the same cable and port with an Intel GigE, and it's about 8 to 10 times faster. So the problem is likely to be with the CentOS config. Any suggestion on how to track down the problem with speed. I have checked the packets with wireshark, no

Hi I installed the following driver. http://www.f.csce.kyushu-u.ac.jp/~shigeaki//software/freebsd-nfe.html Before I had the nve driver which was unstable on this server and on a prior server in both cases causing either spontaneous reboot or just a crash when under load. So far touchwood the nfe driver has stayed up and running at almost 3 days uptime and has had some stress. I know the driver

I've got a pair of identical CentOS 6.7 servers, with SuperMicro X8DTE-F motherboards, these have 2 each Intel 82574L ethernet ports. The eth0 ports are plugged in with 10' runs of brand new cat 5e cable to a Cisco Nexxus 9000 switch (provided by the data center). These servers keep coming up at 100baseT rather than gigE. I've swapped ports and cables with a different server,

So, the more I look at various ways to lay out my infrastructure, the more I am thinking about specs for hardware. Starting with firewalling. How does one determine the specs for a firewall? What I mean is: 1. motherboard/CPU - p4? Dual-Core? Intel i3, i5, i7? 2. RAM? 4gb? 8gb? More? 32gb? 3. Obviously GB Nics! I am bring about 300gb of traffic a month right now and I expect that to

Hello Everyone, We are getting some rather poor results (relative) with our Asterisk setup. Not sure if we are using the sipp correctly etc.. but nevertheless, is there any documentation that describes how we can get the most our of our Asterisk box. For example when we hit the "too many file" error, and fixing it using ulimit..... Also, is there any way we can allocate sufficient

I''ve locked up my dom0 a couple of times this morning copying a 3GB file from local disk to an NFS mount(neither xend nor guests running). I don''t encounter this problem on the stock CentOS 4 kernel. The machine is a PowerEdge 2850 with 2 e1000 cards - the one in use is connected to a PowerConnect 2216 10/100 switch and has negotiated 100Mbit. I''ll check if the stock

I'm looking to expand my bandwidth for my Asterisk PBX. Why should I choose a T1 over DSL for my asterisk server? I found someone offering T1's for $290 a month + Loops or 3 Meg for $561 a month + Loops. Is this a good deal? Thanks Bart -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have an Asterisk sever running with a TE406P card, and 4 pri T1's. I am trying to findout how to send access codes to the switch. After a long distance call is dialed, we get a second dial tone and I need to enter a 4 digit access code, then the switch will place the call. Does anyone know how I can do this? Or does anyone know how to tell asterisk to send to 4 digit code after it is

On 10/10/2016 09:31 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > > oh. Yeah, the entire "net-tools" package is deprecated. I tend to forget which of the two (ethtool or mii-tool) is in that set. # Avoid using any of these: $ rpm -ql net-tools

Hello, Now that we've had our new Digium TE406P card in production for 4 days we have discovered audio drop problems that happen randomly across all channels. Here's more about our setup: P4-3.2GHz 2GB ram Slackware Linux 10.1 with custom kernel 2.4.29 Asterisk 1.2beta1 Digium TE406P quad T1 card with the following attached: - 2 x RBS D4/AMI 24 channel T1s - 1 x RBS B8ZS/ESF 24 channel

Hello again :) With POLLING enabled I experience about 10%-25% performance drop when copying files over network. Tested with both SAMBA and NFS. Is it normal? FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Sep 6 01:52:12 CEST 2008 fxp0: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xc800-0xc83f mem 0xe1021000-0xe1021fff irq 20 at device 8.0 on pci1 # ifconfig fxp0 fxp0:

We are gradually rolling out Dovecot (IMAP only, no POP3) to our customer base. We are replicating between a pair of CentOS 7 boxes. All has been working wonderfully. However, to be sure our rollout continues to go smoothly, we put together a simple benchmark client program to fire up X persistent IMAP connections (using hundreds of mailboxes) that login, list the folders, select the

I just wanted to post here and let everyone know that the TE406P (quadspan T1/E1 with hardware echo can) kicks some serious ass. We've been running a PRI now for over a year with Asterisk (every single call in and out is through two Asterisk boxes, including faxes) and while the software based echo cancellation is more than adequate, we'd get the occassional "edgy" echo and

There you go. "if it is doing no other work" is key phrase. A lot of PC can do that these days if all it has to do is re-route packets to different destinations, and guess what, if you make sure silence compression is turned on at the endpoints, you can claim even more streams can be passed through. The trict here is how * stores the mapping pair and how effiecent its lookup process is.

Hi Guys, I need your recommendation which card to buy?The TE411P or TE406P do they have any difference?I check their brochures they are differ only when it comes to PCI slot voltages.Which card best to use?Btw,Il be using supermicro board with 3.3V and 5.5V?Will il be experiencing problem during the implementation later on if i choose the wrong PCI voltage options?Will it depends on

Hi, I've installed an TE406p, asterisk1.2 on tyan opteron board. After installation there is no interrupts from TE406p. Is this board stable? Should i change * version to 1.0.9? Regards, Jason __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

I''m building another 24-bay rackmount storage server, and I''m considering what drives to put in the bays. My chassis is a Supermicro SC846A, so the backplane supports SAS or SATA; my controllers are LSI3081E, again supporting SAS or SATA. Looking at drives, Seagate offers an enterprise (Constellation) 2TB 7200RPM drive in both SAS and SATA configurations; the SAS model offers