similar to: ruby-agi 1.1.0 released

Release notes of ruby-agi-1.1.1 February 09, 2006 This is a bug fix release of ruby-agi. Below two bugs have fixed in this release. -- ReturnStatus#timeout? was not functional, which has fixed. -- AsteriskVariable#init_caller_variable updated to fix callerid bug which was returning 'nil' for number only callerid. method init_caller_variable is a private method that manage callerid,

Hi, I've been trying to use the set_callerid function in the AGI. It sets the CallerIDname properly but I can't figure out how to set the CallerIDnumber. Is it at at possible ? Cheers. SL

Anyone out there running 1.2beta with a PRI and having CDR problems? I just upgraded to most recent everything and now my CDR's look like this: "","????","9035646130","copper_routing","????","Zap/65-1","SIP/netl-a3ac","Dial","SIP/+19035646130@netl|60","2005-08-31 13:03:09","2005-08-31

I edited the calleridname.agi patch to only overwrite the name if it is missing. The asteridex option still overwrites the name since it is our master list for known numbers. -- Steven calleridname.agi.patch: --- C:\Documents and Settings\steveb\Desktop\calleridname.agi-orig Tue Jun 13 14:37:09 2006 +++ C:\Documents and Settings\steveb\Desktop\calleridname.agi Tue Jun 13 14:37:09 2006 @@ -16,6

I am working with a customer and their SIP provider is IPitimi. The customer needs to sometimes provide various caller id number for the calls going to IPitimi. They are processing calls for multiple businesses who want their caller id to show up. When no caller id is provided, the From must be the DID at ipitimi ip address and caller id is DID at customer IP address. When caller id is

Here is my products.yml version_control_book: id: 1 title: Pragmatic Version Control description: How to use version control image_url: /images/sk_svn_small.jpg price: 29.95 date_available: 2005-01-26 00:00:00 automation_book: id: 2 title: Pragmatic Project Automation description: How to automate your project

Hello, I have released Ruby Asterisk Gateway Interface (ruby-agi) v0.0.2b. Any feedback, bug report, suggession, feature request is most welcome. ruby-agi homepage: http://www.rubyforge.org/projects/ruby-agi/ Download ruby-agi v0.0.2b here: http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/5965/ruby-agi_v0.0.2b.tgz Thanks, Mohammad Khan

----- Original Message ----- > I am trying to vectorize the function > > void bar(float *c, float *a, float *b) > { > const int width = 256; > for (int i = 0 ; i < 256 ; ++i ) { > c[ i ] = a[ i ] + b[ i ]; > c[ width + i ] = a[ width + i ] + b[ width + i ]; > } > } > > using the following commands > > clang

I am trying to vectorize the function void bar(float *c, float *a, float *b) { const int width = 256; for (int i = 0 ; i < 256 ; ++i ) { c[ i ] = a[ i ] + b[ i ]; c[ width + i ] = a[ width + i ] + b[ width + i ]; } } using the following commands clang -emit-llvm -S loop.c opt loop.ll -O3 -debug-only=loop-vectorize -S -o - LV: Checking a loop in

Hi all, I'm new in the list, and I have a problem upgrading from asterisk 1.2 to asterisk 1.4: There is a diference from asterisk1.2 to asterisk1.4 in AMI events. When I do a call to a queue (with the same extensions.conf dial plan) with ast1.2 and ast1.4, in ast1.2 apper 3 newcallerid event in ast1.4 apper only 2. It is normal? anyone knows it? what is the reason? I

Renato, This looks like the right direction. Did you run it on the LLVM test suite to check if it finds new loops to vectorize ? Thanks, Nadav On Oct 21, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Nadav, Arnold, > > I managed to find some time to work on the pointer reduction, and I got a patch that can make "canVectorize()" pass. >

----- Original Message ----- > Bingo! That works (when coming from C source) > > Now, I have a serious problem. I am not coming from C but I build the > function with the builder. I am also forced to change the signature > and > load the pointers a,b,c afterwards: > > define void @bar([8 x i8]* nocapture readonly %arg_ptr) #0 { > entrypoint: > %0 = bitcast [8 x

I'm having trouble getting the manager interface to behave properly; specifically the Originate event. If I create an originate event as below, the calling phone will auto-answer (as it's supposed to) but the receiving phone never rings. It will timeout at 20 seconds. Action: Originate Channel: Local/201@from-sip2 Context: from-sip Extension: 154 Priority: 1 CallerID: John Doe

Bingo! That works (when coming from C source) Now, I have a serious problem. I am not coming from C but I build the function with the builder. I am also forced to change the signature and load the pointers a,b,c afterwards: define void @bar([8 x i8]* nocapture readonly %arg_ptr) #0 { entrypoint: %0 = bitcast [8 x i8]* %arg_ptr to i32* %1 = load i32* %0, align 4 %2 = getelementptr [8 x

Hi, I am wondering what the trick is to use InPlaceEditor on an emtpy div. I have a set up where one div contains a question, and next to it is an emtpy div which should be used for InPlaceEditor. The user clicks on a button "answer" and that activates the InPlaceEditor in the appropriate div. This doesn''t work, however. The div which should use InPlaceEditor must

----- Original Message ----- > Thanks for the alternatives! > > I am trying the 'extracting sub-function' approach. However, it seems > I > can't get the 'subfunction' to pass the verifier. This is my > subfunction: > > define void @main_extern([8 x i8]* %arg_ptr) { > entrypoint: > %0 = getelementptr [8 x i8]* %arg_ptr, i32 0 > %1 =

Hi everybody, I have corrected this line in extensions.conf by stripping spaces off and now it executes: exten => 22999,1,VoiceMailMain(s${CALLERIDNUM}) when it runs, the mail box number is asked and password too. I expected no question were made, because I inserted CALLERIDNUMBER and s in front of box number. Anybody knows why? Thank to you all, very kind members of this list! Ciao Mauro

Hi Nadav, Arnold, I managed to find some time to work on the pointer reduction, and I got a patch that can make "canVectorize()" pass. Basically what I do is to teach AddReductionVar() about pointers, saying they don't really have an exit instructions, and that (maybe) the final store is a good candidate (is it?). This makes it recognize the writes and reads, but then

Thanks for the alternatives! I am trying the 'extracting sub-function' approach. However, it seems I can't get the 'subfunction' to pass the verifier. This is my subfunction: define void @main_extern([8 x i8]* %arg_ptr) { entrypoint: %0 = getelementptr [8 x i8]* %arg_ptr, i32 0 %1 = bitcast [8 x i8]* %0 to i64* %2 = load i64* %1 %3 = getelementptr [8 x i8]*

Renato, can you post a hand-created vectorized IR of how a reduction would work on your example? I don’t think that recognizing this as a reduction is going to get you far. A reduction is beneficial if the value reduced is only truly needed outside of a loop. This is not the case here (we are storing/loading from the pointer). Your example is something like WRITEPTR = phi i8* [ outsideval,