Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Transfer issue with a Cisco CCM/phone"
2006 Jan 12
0
Re: Transfer issue with a Cisco CCM/phone (Peckham, Christopher)
Christopher-
Nothing like defining a complicated environment. I do have some experience
in this arena- but unfortunately, not with the OH323 driver- I generally
stick to the Nufone driver, as I find it more reliable overall. YMMV. One
thing that might help is if you could tell us if it ever worked, or if this
is a new problem that's cropped up since a particular change.
Still- there are
2006 Jan 23
1
Asterisk SIP phones to Cisco Unity via CCM 4.0 SIP Trunk
Hi,
I've got a CCM ( Cisco Call Manager ), with a Cisco Unity VM server and
about 45 SCCP phones on the ccm, and 200 users on unity. we want to
migrate all users to IP Phones to ditch our ancient phone system. I would
love to get Linksys-Sipura SPA-941s for the 150 users not on IP phones yet
and run sip to an asterisk server, but have their voicemail on Unity.
these phones are $150 each,
2011 Sep 19
1
oddity with CISCO CCM and Asterisk
Hi List,
I have a system that connects into Asterisk 1.4.41 using CISCO
CCM 7. Everything works great except when a call is transferred to the
operator. The call goes to the operator via a native bridge and is
completed, then a "phantom process" starts and tries to launch a new call
every 15 minutes. I modified the dialplan to hangup these phantom calls,
but no still
2005 May 25
2
RTP path with Cisco CCM
Hi,
I have the following config:
[7960] <--skinny--> [Cisco CCM] <--SIP_trunk--> [asterisk] <--SIP-->
[X-lite]
Is there a chance to avoid the RTP stream from passing through the Cisco
CCM ? I would like to have all RTP handled by the *.
This is just a testbed, for a larger project. What I want to achieve, is
actually this:
[Cisco Phone] <--skinny--> [Cisco CCM]
2006 Oct 10
5
Cisco CCM - Asterisk
Hi!
I'm trying to communicate a Cisco CCM 4.0 with Asterisk 1.2.11, I 've followed the info in
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+Cisco+CallManager+Integration
but still not able to make Asterisk communicate with Cisco. I keep on receiving ---
SIP/2.0 400 Bad Request - 'Malformed/Missing URL'
--- and ---
SIP/2.0 404 Not Found ---
messages
2008 Feb 27
3
Attended transfers through a GUI
Greetings list,
I've been playing around this afternoon with Flash Operator Panel, trying to
get it to do attended transfers. I am running the latest version.
Has anyone managed to get this working reliably, and if so, would you mind
sharing how you did it please?
Alternatively, are there any other GUIs (free or commercial) that reliably
support attended transfers?
I'm trying to
2006 Apr 14
0
7941/61 IP Phone SIP phone load - for CCM v5.0
Just saw this on Cisco's software download site:
7941/61 IP Phone SIP phone load - for CCM v5.0
Has anyone used this with Asterisk yet?
Josh
2012 Aug 09
1
Asterisk to control just one phone within current CCM?
Hi,
I have used basic Asterisk as a PBX controlling few extensions. My question is simple, at work there is an existing Call Manager/PBX and all which
manages all the extensions for SCCP VOIP phones. Can Asterisk be used to
manage just 1 VOIP phone and still can make internal calls to the other
extensions?
Thanks,
Jorge
-------------- next part --------------
An
2006 Mar 13
3
Callerid on transfer
Hello,
Suppose customer A calls attendant. CallerID of A is displayed at the
attendant. But, when attendant does a consulted transfer to, let's say,
B, the callerID of attendant is displayed at B. When the consulted
transfer is succesful, the callerid of attendant is STILL displayed at
B. Is it possible to, after a successful transfer change the callerid of
the attendant in the callerid of
2003 Dec 16
1
asterisk and cisco call manager via h.323
Does asterisk work with CCM as gateway ?
When I trying call asterisk,I totally can't hear any sound.
When call ohphone - works good.
10.0.1.219 is CCM, 10.0.1.207 asterisk.
Trace messages here :
--------------------
== New H.323 Connection created.
-- Received SETUP message...
== Setting up Call
-- Calling party name: [5001,]
-- Calling party number: [5001]
-- Called party
2004 Aug 27
1
Cisco 7940 - SCCP or SIP?
Hi All
I have recently downloaded Asterisk and was so impressed I thought I would
setup a home server and I went out and got myself a couple of cisco
7940's. (and a sipaura 3000!). thanks to various posts on this list and
the voip-info site I have managed to get chan_sccp setup and working with
the 7940's but the I tried to get the messages, services and softkeys
working. It seems
2011 Nov 14
2
unavailable state not reported to Cisco SPA50X phone
Hello,
?
(using trixbox with Asterisk 1.6.0.26)
?
I am looking for information about how Asterisk should notify the unavailable (SIP) state of a SIP device.
?
I found out that the phone (SPA504G with attendant console) sends a SUBSCRIBE request with an Accept: application/dialog-info+xml.
?
The situation is that the BLF leds are green even for phones that are currently not "online".
2005 Jan 25
0
OH323 Cisco Transfer Key
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
Hi
2006 Oct 12
1
Attended transfer hanging PRI channel
The attendant attempts an attended call transfer (all phones are IP501).
The attendant pushes "hold", "transfer", dials the extension and
announces the call. When the attendant pushes "transfer" the second
time, the original call is lost.
The reason this is a big problem is that the PRI channel for the call
remains busy. Subsequent inbound calls on that
2009 Apr 03
1
Bridging Avaya IP systems and Cisco IP system
Hi all,
Has anyone put * in between an Avaya and Cisco system to connect two
offices together?
I was thinking about adding a SIP trunk on each side and getting
Asterisk to pass calls between them. There is a leased line for
bandwidth.
Any tips/ideas on whether this is possible or dumb?
Thanks.
2004 May 17
0
Some thougts about implementing native 3-way calling and attended transfer
As I understood, Asterisk has a lot of features but lacks native 3-way
calling and attended transfer. It would be great to have these features
available to a simple IAX phone.
I wonder how this could be implemented in Asterisk without asking for a
patch. It should be possible with parking, conferencing, AGI and the
manager interface.
The extension 77 could be used by the attendant to blindly
2007 May 23
1
Asterisk and CCM 5.x SIP trunk
Hi,
I was able to work out SIP trunk between Asterisk and CCM 4.x without
any issues. Whereas SIP trunk in CCM 5.x is not working with Asterisk.
Asterisk is sending OPTIONS messages to CCM 5.x for which CCM is not
replying. For the same reason Asterisk is marking it as UNREACHABLE.
Anybody got Asterisk and CCM 5.x intergation working. How can I fix
the problem which I'm facing with CCM 5.x?
2013 Jan 17
1
g729 codec over SIP Trunk between CCM and Asterisk
Hello,
My problem is, outgoing calls (from asterisk to CCM) work fine but incoming
(from CCM to Asterisk) does not work because of CCM is trying to use g729
over SIP trunk. I have found that link after a quick search. Problem is the
same as in link below (However my Asterisk version is 1.8.13) and solution
seems to have H323 trunk between CCM and Asterisk for using g729 codec. The
post was
2014 Nov 25
0
Prohibit transfer to one extension
Hello all, first post, need help. I'm running a complex asterisk 1.8 install with five machines. I inherited it and don't fully understand it, nor the deep mysteries of asterisk either. I would appreciate any insight you might have. I scoured the 'net and the Digium wiki and my Google-Fu has failed me.
I've been asked to somehow prohibit transfers to extension 3232. It has to be
2008 Feb 27
0
Attended transfers and orginal caller ID
Greetings list,
Have there been any further developments recently regarding presenting the
original caller's caller ID to SIP devices after an attended transfer? I've
googled around on the topic, but most of the threads I've found (some from
this very list) are all dated back in mid-2006 and I wondered if there have
been developments on the issue.
To recap, the desired behaviour