similar to: Re: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 18, Issue 46

I've been Googling around for some time now (a few hours on dial-up). I find all kinds of questions similar to mine, but either there is no answer or the answer has nothing to do with the question. Hopefully this post isn't another one of those. Does Asterisk favor FPU performance or clock speed? (Meaning AMD or Intel) I see Asterisk can be compiled for x64 systems. Does it run any

I tried installing with several options (noacpi noapm; noprobe; noprobe skipddc noacpi noapm nodma). Always I get the same error. BUT this is not in fac a CentOS problem at all, because I get the same error always when I boot from hd (Fedora Core), IF there is a CD in the CD-ROM drive. (I tried with CentOS 1/4, CentOS 2/4 and a HP printer software CD.) It must be something with the CD drive!

Hello, I have this bug report that I have filed. Is there any specific reason why samba behaves this way, and doesn't use the unix semantics? Since this is even more restrictive than unix semantics, I'm more inclined to call it a bug until I know it's supposed to be this way. Any ideas? ----- Forwarded message from Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com> ----- From: Mike Fedyk

looks like you sent this to the wrong person... ----- Forwarded message from JON GERDES <GERDESJ@gkn-whl.co.uk> ----- Envelope-to: mikef@mikef-linux-x86.matchmail.com Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:18:43 -0800 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:17:40 +0000 From: "JON GERDES" <GERDESJ@gkn-whl.co.uk> To: <mfedyk@matchmail.com> Subject: Re: win98-samba2.0.7 = Network

Hi Ext3! I'm running about 30 dedicated MySQL machines under quite decent loads, and they are occassionally crashing. I've been logging console messages recently in an effort to find the cause, and some appear to be related to I perused your lists and found the message I'm replying to. If you don't mind, I've included messages and ksymoops from two crashes that I had

----- Forwarded message from Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> ----- On Wednesday September 19, mfedyk@matchmail.com wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 09:08:32PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote: > > On Sunday September 16, mfedyk@matchmail.com wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm trying to

Is anyone else getting messages from the lists.digium.com mail server with errors about a mail loop? I've been getting this for the last few weeks, but I don't have any list software on my server. Any ideas?

Take a look at this output from lsof: smbd 11490 0 8u REG 3,3 55296 1136647 Maintenanc.fp5 afpd 31010 0 2u REG 3,3 3207 1136655 auction - envelope.rtf afpd 31010 0 5u REG 3,3 4156 1136656 Word Work File L 1 afpd 31010 0 8u REG 3,3 55296 1136647 Maintenanc.fp5 smbd 31386 0 9u REG 3,3 4156 1136656 Word Work

Is it possible to have nested MySQL queries in extensions.conf? Ie, perform a query, grab a value, and then jump to another location in the dialplan and do another query based on that original value. I'm having problems with the result and fetchid's and I'm not sure if it's even possible to do this or not. Thanks, Doug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hello, There are 3 PRI's connected to the card each from different operators. Especially echo occured on span 3 is really annoying. Configuration files are as follows. Is there something wrong in conf ? Zapata.conf -------------------------- [channels] context=default switchtype=euroisdn usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes

This was sent to lkml, I think it may be interesting to this list... ----- Forwarded message from "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es> ----- Envelope-to: mfedyk@mikef-linux-x86.matchmail.com Delivery-date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 16:38:49 -0800 From: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es> To: Lista Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: ext3 for

Define non-Voice T1 porject? You do know that TDMoE does not travel over long distances, You can not route or otherwise take it off of a single ethernet segment. > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of > Mike Hammett > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 1:20 AM > To:

Reason I ask is I may have a non-voice T-1 replacement project going on and I'm investigating my various options. Costs may be about the same for turn-key and DIY. ---- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: <asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Sent: Thursday, February

Ok... I am reluctant to ask this question as I believe that it may be like asking what someones favorite linux distribution is... but I need to make an informed decision. We are getting ready to upgrade from a TE210P to a quad T1 card with echo cancellation. I am trying to decide between the Sangoma card and the Digium card. I need this to have great quality and I need it to work well. I would

Hello. Has anybody knows how run two asterisk process in one hardware? (each one with its own configuration?) Thanks Juan Salas.

Hi, I just read a pressrelease from VON that Digium will soon be releaseing a couple of new cards. What got me interested was: "The TE420P and TE415P support 128ms of G.168 (2002)-compliant echo cancellation across their entire 128 channels." Does anyone know when thease will be released and what they will cost when released? Thanks!

----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070905/c62f4465/attachment.htm

Most of the cases can easily be solved by setting the handset mic gain to 2 (out of 1..8). The gain is usually much to high - optimal for whispering voices. If the other side talks loud the echo of the cable will be amplified too much. CS ________________________________ Von: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] Im Auftrag von Mike Hammett

My provider migrated from an old EOL softswitch to Trixbox. I have a number (8159093011) on a different server on a different network. It appears as though the incoming calls are trying to authenticate against that number, which isn't present on the box. Could someone help me decode this debugging output? I was calling 8159911010. My server is 208.100.1.33. Theirs is 208.1.87.235. I

One of my providers has a different SIP account for each number. I have all of my users in one outbound context (caller ID passes fine). How do I ensure that the callers get routed down their correct SIP account with my provider for e911 purposes without each having their own context? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -------------- next part