similar to: Remote Installation

Dear Peter, Thank you very much for your kind and helpful reply. As I mentioned in a followup email to r-bugs, indeed, one aspect of this issue is a (user specified) shorter stack than that expected by R -- I had only allowed 1 MB of stack space a long long time ago, and forgotten about it. Due to a glitch with r-bugs@r-project.org, I ended up submitting this bug twice, and your original

Hello, I have a RH9 Samba machine (default Server/no updates) joined to an NT4DC with an XP and another NT4 box connecting and sharing files just fine. So I thought, it came to my attention that from the Windows GUI you cannot change the permissions on a file or folder even if you own the file. I have been over the smb.conf file and tried all sorts of examples with no luck. Strange thing

I have read the docs and I have googled, and I have been unable to fix this problem. I have samba 3.0 installed on RH8 and when I have settings like: [global] netbios name = DYER-PC-JO workgroup = DYERLAB server string = SMB Server Test security = share [public] path = /tmp guest ok = yes writeable = yes I can mount my share wonderfully in with both RH9 and OSX as clients.

Apologies if there is a cleanly written and searchable FAQ that I could be directed to. I have no problem to RTFM if I can find the FM... Does Asterisk currently operate under RH9? I have IBM Netfinity 4000R servers that do not support X windows under RH8.x and I prefer not to go back to RH7.3... BTW, where would I find a useful FM? David -- David J. Sussman, MBA email:

Hello, I have been trying to install the tar'd version of samba because I need a few options I can not get to work with the RPM version. This is what I do when i setup samba # tar xvfz samba.x.x.x #./configure --with-winbind --with-winbind-auth-challenge #make #make install And it goes through those steps fine, but when I try to run the smbd or nmbd daeomons, it says it cant find it. And

Hi, for some days now I am/was fighting with an annoying problem. I have to support an environment where RhostRSAAuthecntication via /etc/ssh/sshd_known_hosts is used for password-less login. This works fine with RH7.3 (and RH8) and openssh versions openssh-3.1p1-3 (and openssh-3.4p1-2). Our customer has now requested an upgrade to RH9. That comes with openssh-3.5p-11 and the password-less

Saw on Slashdot there are a few vulnerabilities with PHP. Do these vulnerabilities affect the PHP that's installed? If so, is RedHat going to backport or should I go ahead and grab from source?

Hello, I don't know if it's ISOLINUX or a broken BIOS, this is the first time ever seeing this error. "Extremely broken BIOS" on a EPIA -M10 BIOS Rev 2.07 (latest ver available) EDEN VIA mini-ITX mobo. ISOLINUX on RH8 ver 1.75, RH9 ver 2.00 and Yarrow ver 2.06 all produce the same type of error. RH 7.3 and Lindows boot and build without any problem but I don't think they

I recently reinstalled RH8 as a VMware guest on a WinXP box. I used a previously proven script at level 3, containing, in one line with no inappropriate spaces: mount -t smbfs -o user,noauto,dmask=777,fmask=777,username=xx, password=yy //DELLBOX/linuxShare /mnt/linuxShare I get a failure that reports numerous possibilities including bad fs, and other other things. I suspect I omitted a

This is a config issue, at least I hope so. I have a wbel v3 box (same as rhel v3 box) with 2 nics and it acts as both my firewall and my samba server. eth0: WAN (dhclient to my cable modem provider) eth1: LAN (dhcpd for my private network) The relevant part of my /etc/samba/smb.conf looks like this... [global] interfaces = eth1 lo bind interfaces only = yes os level = 99

hello, my setup is rh8 2.4.20-8, shorewall 2.0.7, freeswan-2.04. ------- policy------- vpn loc accept loc vpn accept vpn fw accept fw vpn accept --------------------- --------zone ------- net net loc local dmz dmz vpn vpn ------------------------ ----- tunnels --------- ipsec net 0.0.0.0/0 vpn ipsecnat net 0.0.0.0/0 vpn -------------------------------------- ------ interfaces

Noted, Darren. Thanks for that. The compile option is interesting, I'll file that for next time. Resolution: Do the install under wine until it stops, kill it. Mounted a Windows hdd, copied the Lotus dir, not overwriting that which got left behind by the killed installation, chown and chmod the new files to similar to those installed by wine, works fine. Very simple, but means

OK, details: I run RH8 (gcc 3.2.something), RH9 (gcc 3.2.2-5) and Fedora. Problems are the same across all setups. Hardware is Athlon 1600+ and half a giga RAM. Runs fail with an assertion when the linear scan allocator is enabled, but runs without problems otherwise. On RH9 (the system I have access to while generating this email) I have the following details: > 1) The LLVM assembly

Try llvmgcc pthread.c -o pthread.ll -pthread You have to link in the pthreads library, and I believe -pthread is all you need on a redhat 9 box. Kevin > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of yue > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 11:43 PM > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: [LLVMdev] pthread?

Hi, For a few months i've been using WhiteBox Enterprise Linux. In fact, i've migrated all my companie's servers (about 20) to this RHEL distro like. Well, it's not that i'm not satisfied, but WBEL is a one man show and that causes me some preocupation. And besides, it seems to me that it can't stand up to the rythm RHEL evolves. That's why i'm writing to you,

Hi, I have downloaded several different sets of the 64-bit ISOs, and have burned them to CD using various of my known-good ISO burning softwares, including Nero and DeepBurn on Windows, as well as the native CD burning KDE linux tool on Xandros Linux. I am using mirrors from the site, like kernel.org. I have chosen low burning speeds also, but when I insert the ISO CD into a server and boot it

Well, I'm a recent convert from WBEL. My biggest concern with CentOS is that the community here seems to want to be more than a recompile of RHEL. But WBEL is floundering, what with Katrina and Rita, and there really being only 1 developer behind it, etc. I offer an automated shell script to switch from WBEL4 to CentOS4 (easy, it's hosted on my home DSL line!) It assumes that

hi, I compile a pthread program using llvmgcc, but when i run pthread.ll, it show: ------------------ [yue at RH9 test]$ llvmgcc pthread.c -o pthread.ll [yue at RH9 test]$ ls pthread pthread.c pthread.ll pthread.ll.bc [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll Creating thread 0 WARNING: Cannot resolve fn 'pthread_create' using a dummy noop function instead! ERROR; return code from

Hi, Has anybody noticed that tcng-9e cannot be compiled on RedHat 9? The error is in the tcsim directory, with error message shown below, -------------------------------------------------- ./setup.klib sed: -e expression #1, char 61: Invalid range end make[1]: *** [klib/.ready] Error 1 ------------------------------------------------- It seems the error comes from the newer version of

Hello, I just upgraded from WBEL 4 to Centos 4.1 per the FAQ. I'm pretty sure after running 'yum update', mysql and apache were updated. I was previously using mod_auth_mysql under WBEL 4 to password protect several directories but now things seem to be broken. When I go to a password protected directory I get an Internal Server Error 500. The only explanation in the error log is