similar to: Error: Could not find the GPG Key necessary to validate pkg

Pardon my ignorance, but if I update or install a package via rpm will YUM pick that up in subsequent updates? Or should I be using YUM for installs if I plan to use it for updates? -- <<JAV>>

I know this is a long shot, but does anyone have any familiarity with this server? It uses the Super X6DH8-G2 motherboard. Currently, we've added an Adaptec 2120S Ultra320 RAID PCI Controller Card to get RAID 5 capability. The installation bombs and from what I can tell it looks like we're getting SCSI resets or the controller is going offline maybe. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

Okay, I'm curious. I just installed CentOS 3.3 and did an update with YUM. I want to run Apache so I first checked to see if it's installed with rpm -q apache. Nada. Yet, in /etc/rc.d/rc3.d I see K15httpd. So I moved that to S15httpd and started it up. It's up. Goto the default page and it's running. So....if it's not showing up in rpm queries, how is/was it installed? --

YUM says I already have ethereal installed, but I have no /usr/sbin/ethereal. I have 3 directories about but no executable. -- <<JAV>>

I'm trying to figure out which would the best implementation for my mail and web server. Any experiences? Caveats? I'm on CentOS 3. -- <<JAV>>

Is anyone using Webmin with CentOS? I've always found it works very well with RHat Linux. I've not used RHEL so I'm not sure. I know on my SuSE server it doesn't seem to work well and suspect there are some location problems. -- <<JAV>>

I'm having particular issues running Veritas in my Windows environment. The agent just seems to baulk on some servers. I've looked into backup solutions running on Linux before but there doesn't seem to be much. Is anyone familiar with something that has Windows agents and yet managed by Linux? <<JAV>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

I'm having a hard time getting PHPBB installed on Centos. We get the error that The PHP configuration on your server doesn't support the database type that you chose. We choose MySQL 3.x but get that error. Perhaps PHP4 isn't compatible with MySQL 3.23.58-1? -- <<JAV>>

Are there any caveats to yum upgrade from 4.1 to 4.2? And can someone tell me if perl-5.8.6 is in 4.2? <<JAV>>

Hello! I'm running clamav-milter, clamd, and sendmail on CentOS 3.3 (RHEL3). I'm trying to verify that my milter works. I've sent test emails from testvirus.org but they don't appear to be getting flagged. I don't see anything in the logs to indicate they were. Is there a sure-fire way to know? Also, how should the clamd work? Does it watch the filesystem? Or will it only work

Im glancing through my email from the mailing list and noticed a lot of talk about centos3.4. When will it be released officially. I have read somewhere that RH is releasing RHEL 4 pretty soon....Im in no need to upgrade because my system is rather stable..just trying to get a idea of what is going on....I know i should be keeping up with the list...but it gets complicated at times. I know j.

Does anyone know how I can get USB Flash worked on CentOS 3.4? I am new to CentOS and I do not know anything about the OS. Even though I inserted USB Flash onto my computer, nothing happened on my computer! Cheers, Ken __________________________________________________________________ Switch to Netscape Internet Service. As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at

I have a problem. I've purchased 2 different brand NAS devices that both use Samba in some form as their "sharing" mechanism. When I attach them to the LAN I get dreadful speed. To the tune of under 3.5GB per hour transfers. I've even done tests on the same subnet. Two Windows servers on that vlan can move files at great speeds. Map one of them to the NAS and it crawls. I recall

Can someone point me to the http:// location where I can import the key for 3.4 i386 Beth -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.caosity.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050228/02319731/attachment.htm

Dear R-Users, I think I have encountered a potential bug (or at least unwanted behavior), but I'm not sure so I wanted to post here first. Lately I've been encountering an error when running a package I put together. I have my package set up to check for updates when it loads but this error occurs and stops the package from loading: Error : .onLoad failed in loadNamespace() for

I just ran up2date on new Centos-3.1 installation and received about 5 of these errors. Is this something to be concerned about? The package kernel-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL is signed with an unknown GPG signature. Continue The package kernel-utils-2.4-8.37.3 is signed with an unknown GPG signature. Continue? The package GConf2-2.2.1-4 is signed with an unknown GPG signature. Continue? It is using the

Hi, Maybe a stupid question: I just installed centos 4beta on a Dell inspiron 3500 laptop. So far so good. But where do I find the gpg key? Transaction Listing: Update: firefox.i386 0:1.0-6.centos4.2 Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4fe06303 public key not available for

I'm running 1.0rc23 on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, and seeing the following: Starting dovecot. Error: Can't use SSL key file /etc/ssl/private/dovecot.pem: No such file or directory In the config file I have: ssl_cert_file=/usr/local/certs/imapd.pem Looking for dovecot.pem on the config file there's only: % grep dovecot.pem dovecot.conf #ssl_cert_file = /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem

I have a system running rsync in daemon mode, the version information: > rsync --version rsync version 2.6.8 protocol version 29 On another system I have: > authoritative# rsync --version rsync version 3.0.7 protocol version 30 I have the following problem when trying to fetch files from the system running the old daemon: # /usr/local/bin/rsync --protocol=29 -vvvvvvvv

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: > On 14.09.2017 21:26, Larry Martell wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> So it sounds like the links needed for the plugin to work are not >>> configured on the system. So you have some symlinks pointing to the >>>