similar to: cmd SIPRedirect for loadbalancing

Hi all, I want to build a central call diverter via asterisk (http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20cmd%20SIPredirect). Calls would come in via SIP from Cisco Callmanager Asterisk would do some searching an diverts the call to an extension, which is also located at Callmanager. When like to use >>sipredirect<< Asterisk complains "No application

Hello, I read http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+SIPredirect I wish to configure asterisk as a redirect server. I have badly understood this command . ASTERISK | sip agents nated ======SER When sip agents send INVITE to the proxy i want ser send this one to ASTERISK . How asterisk can send 302 messages with the good info in

Hello All, I have a linux box running with three NIC''s, I have used brctl tool to configure this box as a bridge, i have given it ONE logical ipaddres, Every thing is working fine, but now i am required to configure the same bridge as a LOAD BALANCER.... On some googling i found the following link http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html This HOWTO requires me to have one

Hi~ My linux box(kernel 2.4.13; used for NAT) have 3 NICs, two of them are for ADSL(I have two adsl line) and the last is for private network. My ISP doesn''t support multilink. In this situation, How can I use both ppp lines for the internet(load shareing or balancing)? Thanks. Lee.

Hi, my company have just bought new network and I have question about one problem. As in topic we must use few completely different dsl''s and balance traffic between them. 2M/0,5M 4Mb/0,5M 8M/0,5M M=Mb/s I''ve never done such thing before so I have doubts how it will work. If the links are symmetric 2/2 4/4 8/8 there is no problem because with weights I can compensate the

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of

Hi, Is there a way for dovecot to use a pool of sql (mysql) servers and load balance queries between these? Also fallback to next available sql server if connection to previous one fails. Can dovecot do such things currently? (If not this is feature request). -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/

Hi all, I'm using Debian, I want to make a local repository which can let me install packages more conveniently. Considering that the rsync tool is the Debian official proposed tool for syncing the files among its different rsync server sites, I use the rsync client to downloading the deb packages from the different rsync servers distributed around the world-wide for good loadbalancing and

I have the following scheme: ------------- ------------- | router | eth0 ------------------ eth0 | router | | linux 1 | | linux 2 | | | eth1 ------------------ eth1 | | ------------- ------------- I''d like to do per packet loadbalancing on linux1 and

hi i recently searched in the mailinglist archive and found similar problems, whose solutions helped very much, thank you. i have the following scenario: a firewall with one lan interface eth0 10.1.1.1/24 and two uplink interfaces eth1 10.2.2.1/24 eth2 10.3.3.1/24 each uplink interface does SNAT: iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j SNAT --to-source 10.2.2.1 iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING

Hi, We have two internet connections and I would like to loadbalance between the two using advanced routing. The gateway machine to my lan has two interfaces, one connected to lan(eth0) and other to wan (eth1). The wan side interface is connected to a switch which is terminated with two internet connections from two ISPs. I have added the routes as follows, ip route add default scope

Hi all iam trying to deploy loadbalance and failover My setup description --Fedora Core 4 --Linux 2.6.12.3 #1 SMP Mon Jul 25 22:37:34 IST 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux --tc utility, iproute2-ss050314 --ip utility, iproute2-ss050314 --iptables v1.3.0 And i had deployed Following configuration #table main with priority 50, the highest one ip rule add prio 50 table main #table 201 ip rule add

I have 2 ADSL ad1 and ad2 , one PC for my firewall and some deamon on it with 3 ethernet : eth0 connect to my LAN ( 192.168.60.0/24 ) and 2 other connect to ad1 and ad2 |eth1 (10.0.1.2)--------------------ad1 ( ADSL 1 ) | My LAN(192.168.60.0/24) |---------eth0( 192.168.60.2)--> PC | |eth2 (10.0.2.2)---------------------ad2 (ADSL 2 ) All computer in LAN has default router =

Personally, I find that indenting config files by 3 spaces has a lot of advantages to indenting them by 4 spaces although conventional wisdom might suggest otherwise. Who's with me on this?

I have been successfully implementing load balancing gateways for multiple ISP links at various locations using Julian''s patches and as suggested in LARTC HowTo. At one location, one of the ISPs is providing connectivity through a PPOE DSL link which has to be dialled in everytime to connect. The gateway has been configured on a Fedora Core 3 based system and I have recompiled the

Asterisk apparently has five echo cancellation algorithms: STEVE, STEVE2, MARK, MARK2 and MARK3. The current default appears to be MARK2. My question is, has anyone had any experience with any of the others (other than MARK2), and is there some conventional wisdom as to when to use one over another? TIA Bruce Komito High Sierra Networks, Inc. www.servers-r-us.com (775) 236-5815

> On 2015-Apr-15, at 08:59, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > > Conventional wisdom, which is often wrong, says that bytes in Function are precious. In the past we've bent over backwards to put bits on Function and have DenseMaps in LLVMContexts and Modules. I think this is probably the *wrong* approach for debug info, which, when it's being used, is used

We are running asterisk with a single POTS line for local calls and a voip line for long distance. Whenever we receive a call on the POTS line it is more than likely, but not always, going to have significant distracting echo. In addition to that there is occasional heavy crackle or static. I have tried to follow the guidelines at :

many many thanks for ur help ok i m making my problem more clear... my LAN ip is :172.16.100.0/24 ip of eth1 is :202.51.78.122 and this is fixed and permanent address and it has no netmask and gateway(so, to provide internet to my LAN i have used the ppp0 for this connection ) ip of eth2 : 203.78.165.154; netmask:255.255.255.248; gateway:203.78.165.153 for eth0 my

piggybacking on the "Syncing Sysvol" thread ... I had thought that the conventional wisdom was that ntacl sysvolreset should be mostly avoided once relative stability achieved and additional GPO's created. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Sysvolreset Has this changed recently? Kris Lou klou at themusiclink.net