similar to: Res: Re: Red Hat Legal Targets www.centos.org website content

Hi all ! I have a box here that is till running tao linux, and I hadn't time to migrate to centos. This morning, I got to taolinux.org, and see that the website is out. Does someone have the "howto" on how to migrate frm tao to centos nearby ? Thanks, Nicolas

I just built a version of the Novell Evolution Connector (to use Evolution with a MS exchange server) that works with RHEL/WBEL/CentOS/TaoLinux. You can get it from here if you are interested... http://www.hughesjr.com/component/option,com_docman/Itemid,34/task,view_category/catid,16/order,dmdate_published/ascdesc,DESC/ Here is the Novell link: http://www.novell.com/products/connector/ Johnny

Printing from windows clients to Samba through cups works perfectly but old (finished) print jobs are piling up in the print queue for the printer on the client side. I never had this problem with the clients when the server was running RedHat 6.2 with Samba 2.2.8 and LPD. The server has been replaced with a server running a RedHat Enterprise Linux rebuild (TaoLinux). The Samba version is

Greetings Everyone, I finally got around to downloading and installing CentOS 3.1. Performed flawlessly :) Any of my whitebox friends still around here? I've been extremely busy with work as of late....I'm still considering getting involved with CentOS. -- Donavan Nelson donavan at whiteboxlinux.net http://whiteboxlinux.net

Hi, I've been trying to build a password forwarding proxy to Gmail without success... The SSL connection to Dovecot is happening no problem (as far as I can tell), but for some reason the conversation between Dovecot and Gmail is getting timed out. I know this is supposed to be simple... :-( But could somebody please give me some help by pointing what I'm not doing right? No matter

I'm going to disassociate from the whiteboxlinux domains... http://whiteboxlinux.net/news.php

Hi, I am deciding on what 'RHEL clone' to use and prefer to use one that has a quick release after RedHat releases an update. I checked the repositories, but have not encountered any of the latest errata. Am I looking at the wrong place ? Thanks, Taco

Hi, I'd like to come back to this topic. We've discussed this before on IRC but there's still no acceptable solution implemented. 3rd party kernel-modules are build against the official Red Hat kernels, to make them work with the TaoLinux/CentOS kernels there are specific requirements: + kernel RPM package should provide the same version/release + kernel version/release should

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 5764 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040927/0c1d794b/attachment.gif

what is the most stable linux that we can build business on it, i mean the best linux a linux without problems . __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

hello, I'v installed samba vscan 0.3.5 on whiteboxlinux 3 with samba 3.0.4, whe I try to access to test file on vscan dir my log say: lookup 'U?????]??E ??v?????!/samba.ldif' search for 'U?????]??E ??v?????!/samba.ldif' in lrufiles file 'U?????]??E ??v?????!/samba.ldif' not matched entry 'U?????]??E ??v?????!/samba.ldif' not found file entry 'U?????]??E

Hi! I installed shorewall shorewall-2.1.7-1 on a newly installed box. When using 1.4 versions I could enable shorewall in ntsysv, now shorewall doesn''t show up in ntsysv? I am running shorewall on a RedHat Enterprise Linux rebuild (www.taolinux.org). Is this a bug or a feature?

Hi, I think that this is a great idea regarding to tne new situation with redhat. Do you have differences to whiteboxlinux.org with your project ? Best regards Niels

On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 10:19 -0400, David Parsley wrote: > Hi all, > > Over the last year or so I've been watching my employer's and my own > finances slowly go down the drain, with quality of life and happiness > not far behind. Finally this spring, I decided I would have to do > something before things got really bad. What I've done is get another > job - a

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Rick Graves wrote: > > Please change $releasever manually by '3', and > > everything should work. > > That seems to have fixed accessing your repository. > > I only typed > > yum list j2re > > and now it is downloading lots of headers. > > I stopped it by pressing Ctrl-c many times fast. > > I think I am up to

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Is the there Plain Kernel for i586arch or I have to compile it form i386source. Best Regards Cooba

Hello, I encountered a problem when upgrading from 3.3 to 3.4 on i386. The machine is a production name server running bind. Looks like the new rpm moved my named.conf to .rpmsave and chkconfig'ed bind to off. That's really bad. A more gentle behavior would have been to save the new named.conf to .rpmnew and not mess with initscripts. Anyone else notice that? Francois Caen

Hi, For a few months i've been using WhiteBox Enterprise Linux. In fact, i've migrated all my companie's servers (about 20) to this RHEL distro like. Well, it's not that i'm not satisfied, but WBEL is a one man show and that causes me some preocupation. And besides, it seems to me that it can't stand up to the rythm RHEL evolves. That's why i'm writing to you,

Here is the setup: POTS -> PRI -> Asterisk -> ATA (Fax) The ATA is set to only 711. Asterisk's sip.conf sets this device to only 711. Yet, faxing works less than 50% of the time. I cannot possibly be the only person with this problem. I can't even get app_rxfax to work. It answers but rxfax drops the call 5 seconds into it. If anyone out there has near 100% success with