similar to: translate letters into digits

On 09/03/2016 10:56 AM, Etienne Dechamps wrote: > C will still need keys in order to establish metaconnections with A and B (as > well as a few other things). However there is no need for C to own any > "Subnets" at all. If somebody breaks into C, he could get access to the vpn network, right? Because the keys are there, it will be possible to use them to get access. Even if

Hi all, it took a while, but on sourceforge.net I added the new release 0.6 of chan_capi-cm driver. Note: dial string and capi.conf has changed. The main changes are: - added 'relaxdtmf'. - more BSD compatibility - correct PROGRESS handling - added verbose text for capi info/reason error messages. - use correct facility-selector for echo-cancel - added application capicommand() for CAPI

Hi all, I would like to announce the first release of the chan_capi channel driver on sourceforge.net The package is available for download with name chan_capi-cm-0.5 and is the current CVS HEAD. It is derived from the chan_capi-0.4.0PRE1 of kapejod. The main changes are: - complete rework - fix race-conditions - fix call state handling - rework of debug/verbose messages - added capiFax

Armin, I am running 1.2.7.1 with an Eicon T1 board version 2 on Debian 2.4 I don't know the details on chan-capi / CAPI drivers. We did the install April of this year. How can I tell what I have? Thank you for your time. Tim -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Armin Schindler Sent: Wednesday,

On 09/02/2016 08:51 PM, Etienne Dechamps wrote: > What version of tinc are you using? tinc 1.1 already does what you want out of > the box: packets sent from node A to node B through node C will use a key that > A and B will negotiate between themselves. C doesn't have the key, and will > act as a blind relay. C will not be able to decipher the packets flowing > between A and B.

Hello, These are error messages I get when I try to call a number over CAPI channel. -- Executing SetCallerID("SIP/xlite1-3b80", "0") in new stack -- Executing Dial("SIP/xlite1-3b80", "CAPI/hfcpci/b17") in new stack > data = hfcpci/b17 > capi request for interface 'hfcpci' == hfcpci: Call CAPI/hfcpci/b17-1 (pres=0x00,

On 2/14/20 2:23 PM, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: > On 14 Feb 2020, at 14:05, Armin Schindler wrote: > >> On 2/14/20 11:44 AM, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: >>> On 14 Feb 2020, at 11:06, Armin Schindler wrote: >>> >>> ??? Hello! > > [?] > >>> For our new setup (planned with CentOS 8, waiting for the official repo for the latest dovecot >>>

Hi! I have some (short) question about the Eicon DIVA (V-)4BRI cards I want to have (short) answered before buying the DIVA card. I know there are several Eicon guys active on the list, thus I ask on the list instead of directly to Eicon so that all other will benefit as well. 1. Do Eicon DIVA (V-)4BRI cards support TE and NT mode? 2. Can the clock (master/slave) be configured independent

Hi everyone, I have Asterisk SVN-trunk-r7498 running for a few months and I'm quite happy with it. However, I am experiencing a quality issue with my AVM Fritz!card PCI which is used with chan_capi. When somebody calls me on this line he hears a lot of noise and I hear "scratches" and "plops". It is very annoying. Below is is my /etc/asterisk/capi.conf I've tried to

Hello, sorry for beeing off-topic here. But can anyone confirm that there is a problem reverse resolving lists.digium.com (216.207.245.17) ? Because of this problem, my mail server will not accept mails from lists.digium.com (it is configured to accept valid DNS only). Armin

Hello all, as written in my other posts, I have a setup of about seven hosts. Two of them (A and B) use StrictSubnets and an own routing via a special host (C), because C has better connection to the A and B than a direct A-B connection. Host C is in a place where I need to create special security settings. The VPN encrypted data shall not be available on host C. There is no need for host C be

Hi to all I've mada up my mind and i tried to change from i4l to chan_capi, following some councelling from the gurus. I compiled it up, and when i try to load it in modules.conf, i get that wonderful message and Asterisk does not start: [chan_capi.so]Feb 17 09:21:40 WARNING[16384]: loader.c:239 ast_load_resource: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_capi.so: undefined symbol: ast_get_group Feb

On 2/14/20 11:44 AM, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: > On 14 Feb 2020, at 11:06, Armin Schindler wrote: > > Hello! > > we are about to move from cyrus to dovecot and have one open issue > for that migration. > With cyrus we have "shared/" folders with a name that is self defined like > shared/project-xyz > but the email address for direct

Hi (Armin?) ! Today I had a problem with Diva Server 4BRI-8M 2.0. Asterisk 1.2.12.1 chan_capi-cm-0.6.5 divas4linux-melware-3.0.f-106.622-1 Asterisk could not receive and make calls on the BRI ports, although the ports looked fine within Asterisk. I usually use "/usr/lib/divas/divactrl dchannel -c 1" to test line activity. This time there was no activity (cryptic log

Hello All, Has anyone configured bri to answer for only one msn? In essence, when the primary is busy I want to have channel 2 ring. I am using an eicon diva server bri I know I saw it in the windows interface, but don't see it in the linux setup. Regards, Greg

On 30.08.2016 17:37, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 02:38:16PM +0200, Armin Schindler wrote: > >> we use a meshed VPN with TINC to connect 7 offices. >> Some office are in other countries and use other ISPs. The connection >> between some ISPs (peering partners) are not that good. This means we >> have packet loss between those direct connections.

Hi all, I use asterisk cvs-head from last week and was wondering why my macros are not working like I expected. A macro will be aborted if one application returns error (-1), but some applications (like ChanIsAvail() in my case) do return -1. So when I want to use ChanIsAvail() in a macro, it does not work if the channel is not available, because the macro is not executed on n+101. The macro

Hello all, we are using tinc 1.0.24 with 6 hosts (endpoints). Quality of service is used with prio qdisc on all network interfaces. This means depending on the TOS value of the IP header IP-packets will get a priority queue on the network interface. Packets from TINC (UDP 655) maybe reordered using these queues to send out high-prio (VoIP) packets first. Could this create a problem on the

Hello all, we use a meshed VPN with TINC to connect 7 offices. Some office are in other countries and use other ISPs. The connection between some ISPs (peering partners) are not that good. This means we have packet loss between those direct connections. To avoid this direct connection, I would like to tell TINC to use a defined other host to route the packets to. E.g. instead of doing direct

On 14.02.2020 11:44, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: > On 14 Feb 2020, at 11:06, Armin Schindler wrote: ... > > The sorting in the according public folder happens in a global sieve > script before user scripts are fireing. It is combined with the ?+? > notation in postfix for sub addresses and an special ?listadm? user > > postfix: > | > listadm+Verteiler/info@$DOMAIN > |