Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "CentOS review"
2008 Jan 21
1
Definitive HowTo for CENTOS 5 Winbind - Samba - Active Directory Integration
Hi all,
I have been out of the linux / unix loop for a good three years now, and a
lot has changed..
I have a windows 2003 server on my home office lan as my domain controller.
I would like to know if there is a good how-to that applies to Centos5 to
achieve the following:
Joining the centos machine to the AD domain (I believe I have done this
already)
Sharing files from it
2002 May 23
1
now available: RwebWin
I ported Jeff Banfield's Rweb (http://www.math.montana.edu/Rweb/) to
Windows. In the process, I dropped some things (non-JavaScript version,
Rweb modules and data sets), but also simplified the installation process by
removing the dependency on NetPBM. A Ghostscript dependency remains,
however.
See http://www.liquidmarkets.com/m.php?m=News&file=article&sid=6 for
up-to-date
2004 Dec 24
1
FC3, TDM11B (DEVPCI) and asterisk
Hey folks;
I am a old Dialogic telephony hack and have tried asterisk a while back on
a laptop with the OSS module and I liked what I saw. I recently came across
some info regarding asterisk 1.0 and thought I should give it a go. I used a
AMD K7 MB, compiled the binaries without a real problem and realized that I
might have a sound card issue because I couldn't hear the messages but the
demo
2007 Apr 16
3
Maildir, INDEX, and folders
I'm reading the wiki et el. regarding indexes, but can't come up with a
coherent answer to the setup and what will happen. I want to take the
indexes and move them off of NFS (~/Maildir) and place in
/var/spool/dovecot/indexes, but not have to hand create everything (user
homes, mail folders)
So, I create a parent folder /var/spool/dovecot/indexes that has the
appropriate permissions
2005 Aug 26
0
portsentry and proftpd RPMs available
Just dropping a note, I've built CentOS4 friendly RPMs (as well as RHEL4
and FC4) of two of my favourite tools, PortSentry and ProFTPd:
ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/ftp.falsehope.net/home/tengel/portsentry/CentOS4/
ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/ftp.falsehope.net/home/tengel/proftpd/CentOS4/
PortSentry is built using the last known (RedHat 9 based) SPEC/patches
from FreshRPMS, updated to apply
2005 Feb 09
0
RE: CentOS Digest, Vol 2, Issue 13
>>>
I have ecommerce stores on my server who use the same instantssl certificate
without any problems. These particular certificates were migrated over from
one plesk system to my new server with centOS 3.4 and plesk 7.5.1 reloaded.
>>>
We got it working. It was a custom config problem for that one site.
Sincerely,
Melinda Odom
www.designhosting.biz
479-471-0891
2005 Feb 24
1
4 Final, RC1 -> Final?
Build team -- what's our current outlook on the 4 Final release shaping
up to be (ie, this week, next week, a month..)? Should it be further
out, would it be relatively painless to 'upgrade' (so to speak) from the
current RC1 to Final when it rolls around?
thanks!
-te
(I have a new project server waiting in limbo, would like to at least
get started - nonproduction)
--
Troy
2005 Jan 13
3
CentOS4 + Subversion?
Hey all - does RHES4/CentOS4 beta contain a recent integration of
Subversion? I've been holding off trying to retro-fit CentOS 3.x on our
CVS server, hoping that the official channels aready had it in store for
the future. Not that you *can't* retrofit, I was just uncomfortable
upgrading so many stock packages.
Anyone have it installed, can take a look for me?
thx,
-te
--
Troy
2008 May 23
1
Multiple private namespace question
(apologies if this has been covered, can't find it on the Wiki/FAQ, etc.)
We have a stellar, fantastic, hard working Dovecot 1.0.5 (yes, I need to
upgrade) installation running in Courier-IMAP compatibility mode:
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:INDEX=/var/spool/dovecot/indexes/%1u/%u
namespace private {
separator = .
prefix = INBOX.
inbox = yes
}
A user purchased
2003 Jan 16
0
[OT] Mandrake
For those who missed it:
http://www.ofb.biz/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=192
Mandrake declared the French equivalent of Chapter 11 today.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy
AIM: teastep \ http://shorewall.sf.net
ICQ: #60745924 \ teastep@shorewall.net
2004 Apr 05
0
SRTP (was: Spring VON Wrap Up)
At 1:07 PM -0700 on 4/5/04, Scott Laird wrote:
>[snip]
>2. Is anyone working on SRTP for Asterisk? Are there any SRTP
>clients out there?
>
>Scott
Yes to both.
http://www.voxilla.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=56
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9818470~mode=flat
Read carefully. Sipura is offering crypto in their newest (yet to be
2004 Dec 13
0
Asterisk and Sipura SPA-2000
Hello all,
So i am new to asterisk and very green when it comes to Linux, so don't beat on me too bad :)
I just set up * on Red Hat 9.0 last night... everything "seems" to be configured coffectly, I can start * no problem and get the CLI prompt... now here is my question... I have an account set up with VoicePulse Connect! and also have a Sipura Spa-2000... i am trying to get make
2007 Feb 17
2
LDAP auth load? (looking for advice)
One of the changes my beta testers are testing is switching from NIS to
LDAP for login/auth/homedir lookups; all is working perfectly, Dovecot +
PAM/nss_ldap is A-OK. No issues here, we've been using LDAP lookups on
other servers for years.
I'm wondering about load, specifically if when I switch the entire
company over, will the new authentication load stress my LDAP server to
the
2006 Jul 30
0
rsync
Hi,
I tried these and none of them worked:
Add this you your rsync command --exclude=**/cache --exclude **/download
--exclude**/pub, and see if it gives you the required result. If not then
please be more specific.
On 7/27/06, Troy Engel <tengel at fluid.com> wrote:
>
> Melinda Odom wrote:
> >
> > I have also read the man pages but am not understanding.
>
> What
2004 May 18
0
FW: * and Cisco routers
I understand that softphone are the answer in fact I deploy a ton of the Ip
comm version every week. I am under contract with the phones so I can't
sell them and there no easy way out of the contract.
As for 79XX's I have several office that have them working over a VPN backed
in to our main office where the CCM's and GW's are with managable problem
and for the most part they
2006 Apr 01
2
Asterisk box with unreliable ping/latency
Hello!
Over the last couple of days I?ve been trouble shooting a strange problem
with Asterisk.
First of all, I should say that I?ve been running Asterisk on a Fedora Core
3 box since last May, but decided to do a reinstallation of everything due
to some problems we?ve had with echos during conversations (100% SIP based,
so no ZAP echos). We are talking about a low-volume installation
2007 May 09
2
Thunderbird or Dovecot bug? (multiple keywords)
Here's a strange one. I have a user who's using Thunderbird 2.0.0 and
assigning multiple tags (keywords) to emails, which are getting "lost"
(I'll explain) when he leaves the folder and comes back. I can reproduce
this on *his* account myself, but cannot reproduce it on *my* account
(separate new TBird 2.0.0 profiles on Windows XP).
Use the two TBird default tags
2007 Mar 23
2
idxview: Fatal: file hdr read() 41984 != 1170103198
Playing with the new idxview I got this error running against my INBOX
dovecot.index.cache file. What exactly does it mean?
Full output:
# /usr/libexec/dovecot/idxview dovecot.index.cache
-- INDEX: dovecot.index.cache
version = 1.8
base header size = 0
header size = 1170103198
record size = 1170103283
compat flags = 7
index id = 0
flags = 26512
uid validity = 0
next uid = 2460778624
messages
2004 Sep 14
2
RHN-like system for CentOS?
Team,
Is anyone aware of a Red Hat Network alike system of server package
update status that could be adapted for CentOS3? I'm not interested in
the complete management aspect (channels, scheduling remote updates,
etc) but merely the ability to see your list of systems and determine
which are out of date with XXX packages. If you happen to manage a
large-ish number of RHES3 systems, you
2007 Apr 19
0
FYI: TB 2.0.0 + DC 1.0.0 = OK so far
Just a status note - my beta group is upgrading/upgraded to the new
Thunderbird 2.0.0 (OS X & Win32 so far, Linux to come) and beating it up
against Dovecot 1.0.0 and all is A-OK, nary a problem in sight.
Obviously just an initial status report, but good mojo so far for those
curious about trying it.
-te
--
Troy Engel | Systems Engineer
Fluid, Inc | http://www.fluid.com