Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "Asterisk 1.2.0 fails to hang up using SIP"
2005 Aug 15
12
Voipbuster blocking Asterisk/IAX connections?
What settings are people using? I've seen the ones from dslreports but
I'm in that lucky group of people that paid the 1 euro just to have it
no longer work. Even after I setup a additional account over the
weekend it still doesn't work. And, of course, etherreal only shows
encrypted traffic so I can't snag any config settings from it.
Any assistance?
-----Original
2004 Sep 24
4
ssh security
Derek Ragona wrote:
>> I tried to implement a similar scheme in my hosts.allow on a FreeBSD
>> 5.2.1 server. But when I try to test it from an IP outside my LAN, it
>> still allows ssh logins. I even put in a line in hosts.allow to
>> explicitly deny the IP I was ssh'ing from, but it still let me in.
>> The behavior gives the appearance that TCP wrappers
2006 Feb 09
4
Problem win Unicall
I am having a strange problem with an asterisk servier using R2 Unicall
in Mexico. Most calls go through fine but some of them give me an error like
this:
-- Executing Dial("SIP/86-db41", "Unicall/g2/014448343600") in new stack
-- Called g2/014448343600
Feb 9 21:44:39 WARNING[23069]: chan_unicall.c:2644 handle_uc_event: Unicall/2
event Dialing
Feb 9 21:44:45
2008 Sep 09
15
Need help with an odd issue I am experiencing
I have a server with dual nic's running centos 5.2 1 nic connects to the
cable modem, which has 15m d and 2m up, but speed tests barely come back
at 5mb down including road runner's internal speed test. I hook up my
laptop to the same modem, same port, using the same cable and I get 17mb
down. I have ruled out iptables, nics (because same result on both
nics), cables, cable modem(with
2005 Aug 03
2
MFC/R2 Mexico Unicall Blocked
I've been trying to configure an E1 in Mexico using unicall, i went
into vozdigital, googled this list, and finally followed this
instructions:
http://voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+MFC+R2
I have 10 PSTN numbers and 10 "lines" assigned, so i only have 10
"channels" assigned from my telco.
However when i try to simulate a call using this call file:
--------call
2004 Aug 06
1
(no subject)
auth 57b5848b subscribe icecast svetter@dsli.com
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
2010 Nov 10
0
Tower of the Ancients
1.3.5 had a page fault in the legacy (win'95/95) game. Here is the log.
[code]
fixme:exec:SHELL_execute flags ignored: 0x00000100
fixme:exec:SHELL_execute flags ignored: 0x00004100
fixme:win:EnumDisplayDevicesW ((null),0,0x33eba4,0x00000000), stub!
fixme:win:EnumDisplayDevicesW ((null),0,0x33f584,0x00000000), stub!
fixme:win:EnumDisplayDevicesW ((null),0,0x33f590,0x00000000), stub!
2017 May 25
0
Windows 2012 s4u2self followed by s4u2proxy fails against samba
Hi,
I hit the issue described in this thread
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/linux.samba/VfjW9Af92Wg while
testing out s4u2self and s4u2proxy in a windows service, so I wanted
to share my setup.
So I wrote a small windows service that's running as a local system
account to impersonate an user via s4u2self (using LsaLogonUser in
win32 api than calling ImpersonateLoggedOnUser) and then
2018 Apr 09
1
Account lockouts caused by SAMBA + WinBind do not report "Caller Computer Name" in security audit
Hello all,
We are troubleshooting an issue that when SAMBA is joined to a Windows
domain controller as a member server that has password failure lockouts
configured, the Windows security auditing does not show the "Caller
Computer Name" in the event ID generated (4740).
We are using Samba 4.6.2 from CentOS 7. We posted a Bugzilla at Red Hat
here:
2006 Aug 06
2
partion
hi all,
i have reinstalled linux i kept free 17 gb space.
i have created 4gb partition by fdisk with LVM options.
fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 40.0 GB, 40060403712 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4870 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 1275 10241406 7
2006 Aug 06
2
partion
hi all,
i have reinstalled linux i kept free 17 gb space.
i have created 4gb partition by fdisk with LVM options.
fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 40.0 GB, 40060403712 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4870 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 1275 10241406 7
2006 Sep 11
3
Installation difficulty with "rimage"
Dear R people,
I am trying to install rimage using install.packages("rimage") but am
receiving the following errors despite having FFTW installed. I would
appreciate any help to get this fixed.
checking fftw.h usability... no
checking fftw.h presence... no
checking for fftw.h... no
configure: error: Sorry, can't find fftw header
ERROR: configuration failed for package
2012 Oct 19
1
FW: [PATCH] workqueue: cancel_delayed_work() should return %NULL if work item is idle
FYI, it is likely that ocfs2 will not work on 3.7-rcN until
the following one-line patch is merged, as the code in ramster
that provoked it is directly leveraged from ocfs2 o2net.
> From: Tejun Heo [mailto:tj at kernel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 5:39 PM
> To: Dan Magenheimer
> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; Konrad Wilk
> Subject: [PATCH] workqueue:
2010 Aug 05
1
[LLVMdev] RegAllocFast assertion in trunk...
Any ideas?
Instruction uses an alias of an allocated register
UNREACHABLE executed at RegAllocFast.cpp:358!
0 clang 0x0000000101309bc2 PrintStackTrace(void*) + 34
1 clang 0x000000010130a863 SignalHandler(int) + 707
2 libSystem.B.dylib 0x00007fff8056935a _sigtramp + 26
3 libSystem.B.dylib 000000000000000000 _sigtramp + 2141809856
4 clang 0x00000001012dd96d
2015 Aug 29
0
IMAP hibernate feature committed
On 26 Aug 2015, at 13:33, Thomas Leuxner <tlx at leuxner.net> wrote:
>
> With this I see messages like this in the logs:
>
> Aug 26 09:48:06 nihlus dovecot: imap-hibernate(tlx at leuxner.net): Connection closed in=189 out=4252 hdr=0 body=0 del=0 exp=0 trash=0
> Aug 26 12:20:29 nihlus dovecot: imap-hibernate(tlx at leuxner.net): Connection closed in=109 out=4714 hdr=0 body=0
2015 Aug 26
5
IMAP hibernate feature committed
* Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> 2015.08.25 22:21:
> There's no good default setting here. It depends on your userdb settings and/or mail_uid setting. So for example if your imap processes are running as vmail user, you should set service imap-hibernate { unix_listener imap-hibernate { user = vmail } }. Then again if you are using system users (or otherwise multiple UIDs) it gets more
2001 Nov 01
1
(no subject)
Morning,
I am sitting with a slight problem at the moment my situation is :
I have a machine running Linux( Mandrake ) with Samba on and another with Win '98.
I have a shared drive on my Win '98 machine. The Linux machine can see the shared drive and can write files to it.
But what happens is that I create a file on my Linux machine and then I rename it to another
2013 Jan 10
0
same model, different coefficients
Hello R-help subscribers,
I am analyzing a data set using a mixed logit model, and I have recently
discovered some curious behavior. I am hoping you all can help.
I first ran the following model in December 2012.
lmer(Response.binary ~ ItemType.c * Block + (1 | Subject) + (1 | Word),
data=lexdec, family="binomial")
I then took a break from the data for the holidays. I returned to
2015 Aug 27
0
IMAP hibernate feature committed
On 08/26/2015 01:33 PM, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> * Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> 2015.08.25 22:21:
>
>> There's no good default setting here. It depends on your userdb settings and/or mail_uid setting. So for example if your imap processes are running as vmail user, you should set service imap-hibernate { unix_listener imap-hibernate { user = vmail } }. Then again if you are
2013 Apr 05
1
flac 1.3.0pre3 pre-release
On 1.4.2013 16:04, LRN wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01.04.2013 16:55, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>> On 1.4.2013 15:29, LRN wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 01.04.2013 16:24, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>>>> I'm worried about some of the modifications done to the UTF-8