similar to: X100P Wildcard - Hassle free clone?

I am starting to dip my toes into the asterisk world, and to that end I've scavenged an old PC (this is a home project, and I have basically $0 to spend on it), and installed FC1. I've purchased a clone X100P (or at least I was told it was), and I am trying to get it to work. However, when I try and load the wcfxo module, I get the following errors... [root@loudhoward root]# insmod

I'm new to asterisk and fror a cupple of days I heave been googleing the net for digium "clones", because it's very hard for me to get a digium card (X100P). Does anyone Know another substitute for X100P (I know that intel based modem with chip 537/MD3200 is working but I did not find any of those) ? I made it work with an Intel 536 (with a costumised driver that I found on

Hello, I have samba 3.20 running in test on Solaris 8 and 9 beautifully it is curently configured as a Domain Client it authenticates using winbind and nsswitch libraries using ADS with windows 2003 server. I have krb5 and ldap working just fine but I now find myself with a mess of bugs and questions and I could really use some of your expertise in the matters so here they go, Thank you soooo

I can either get the TE100P working or the 3 X100P clones working, but never both. I have the TE100P connected to a channel bank, and X100P clones to lines from the phone company. This is my zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,d4,ami fxsks=1-24 loadzone=us fxols=25-27 loadzone=us I then do [root@asterix root]# modprobe zaptel [root@asterix root]# modprobe wcte11xp ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel

Owias, The 537 is, for the most part, a drop-in replacement for the Digium card. Please search the archive and the Wiki, as there have recently been several discussions about this exact subject. To my knowledge that is about the only modem that works, but keep in mind it is _not_ supported. That being said, follow the instructions on Digium's site for installing the X100P and you should be

Hello everyone. I hope that this isn't a sore topic, but I've spent a week now reading through everything I could dig up from the archives on this topic, and I'm not yet satisfied with any conclusions presented there. I've also spent a few days hacking on the Asterisk code, trying to understand how things work better, and I'm still not ready to give up. I well-realize

It seems that the Apollo MD3200 winmodem sold my newegg no longer uses the MD3200 chipset. At least the $13 version I ordered arrived with a different chipset. I made them aware of the issue and hopefully they will be changing their description soon. Anyway, I'm looking for a new source now, anyone know where to get these cards cheap? I know there is ebay, but I'm thus far getting sellers

We are looking at building a storage platform based on Dell HW + ZFS (likely Nexenta). Going Dell because they can provide solid HW support globally. Are any of you using the MD1200 JBOD with head units *without* an MD3200 in front? We are being told that the MD1200''s won''t "daisy chain" unless the MD3200 is involved. We would be looking to use some sort of

It seems the information out there on this topic was confusing enough to cause me to waste a lot of time, and that this topic is rehashed periodically. So now it's my turn.... I had a modem with an Intel 537EP chip on it and thought it might work with the zaptel drivers. Initially, it seemed the only issue would be the PCI device & vendor codes. Then, I ran into the problem that

Does asterisk support the intel 537/md3200 chipset? I don't want to start any flames here, I know all about using generic crap in asterisk,[*] which I really don't approve of other than for testing, but I have a customer demanding a generic chipset for his one backup analog line. He will not spend the money for a Digium card and says he will find another company if I can not provide a

Do normal modems work with asterisk?

hi, i've a question. is it possible to buy digium x100p card from italy in some store (also online) without ordering it from USA? on more, did anyone buy a modem with intel chipset 537 or md3200 and where (in italy)? Thanks __________________________________________________________________ Tiscali ADSL Senza Canone, paga solo quello che consumi! Non perdere la promozione valida fino al 27

X101P with Ambient md3200 chip on it, with the zaptel wcfxo driver.... Just an indication of how many people have got this to work would be useful. Cheers Mark.

Hello, I have asterisk running on Fedora Core 3 with a x100p (oem). After some time I got asterisk with some soft extensions working (u gotta love open source), but I'm stuck with outbound dialing. This is the diagnose: - detect 1 wcfxo channel. - when trying to make an outside call I get unable to create channel of type Zap. Everyone is busy/congested at this time - When I plug the x100p

Hi, I have successfully compiled spandsp 0.0.2pre10 with * 1.05 which can accept inbound fax calls. However, all fax received are incomplete (the first 10% of an A4 page is fine, the remaining is either missing or garbled). I suspect this is due to 'training error' (see below) which, according to Steve Underwood's postings, cannot be resolved further. I wonder if it would help to

Hi, I'm new to R, and I'm STATA user before, could you help me where I can get document about comparison command between STATA and R. Thank you very much, Best regards, -iip-

I have 2 contexts, however both have the same h extension. Currently I am doing copy&paste for the h extension - is there a better way? Can I somehow reference a h extension, so I have to create/modify it only once? Thanks for any hint! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi All, I've got an MD3200 modem which is working as a Zaptel FXO interface for Asterisk (X100P clone I believe). It seems to work, but on incoming or outgoing calls I can hear the other party ok but when I speak, I hear my voice echo back at me (quite quietly but it's distracting!) on everything I say. The other party doesn't seem to hear the echo - they just say I sound a bit quiet.

Just for fun, I tried to reproduce such an overflow. I turned on all debug macros, assertions, and checked arithmetic and then encoded 2 hours of mixed speech/audio with these parameters: Sample rate = 48000 Channels = 1 Application = OPUS_APPLICATION_AUDIO Bitrate = 24 KB/s Force Mode = MODE_SILK_ONLY Signal Type = OPUS_SIGNAL_AUTO Complexity = 10 Frame size = 480 samples (10ms) No errors came

I think the better solution should be: LLVMContext& C = is->getContext(); Value *values[] = { ConstantInt::getSigned(Type::getInt64Ty(C), *scsr*), MDString::get(C, *"path"*) }; lnstr.setMetadata(*"your_analysis_name"*, MDNode::get(C, values)); So that you can take advantage of the type system of LLVM bitcode, and don't have to cast the integers from/to strings