similar to: 64K ISDN call not passing thru

I just wanted to see if any one else has seen this or could help point me in the right direction on this problem. I have a TE411P card in my * box. I am running FC4 x86_64. I used to have two TE110 cards in the same box that worked without any problems. Since changing to the TE411P cards, I am getting random DTMF tones being produced on a bridged connection through the same Channel Bank that I

Hi, I found E400P quad PRI card quite cheap (749USD): http://www.govarion.com/product_info.php?cPath=1&products_id=2&osCsid=68cdd6e3d08754 in comparison to te410p (approx 1500 USD ) http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=product_detail&category=hardware&product=TE410P Now newer generation with HW echo canceling emerged (te411p). I'm not sure in what things those two cards

since updating to 5.9 a little while ago I find a load of these in /var/log/messages, which I've not seen before: Jan 17 22:17:18 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(216.230.228.211) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 22:17:20 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(199.4.29.166) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 22:17:31 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(129.70.132.37) (fd=22): Invalid argument Jan 17 22:34:22 fcshome

[Cross-posted to the asterisk forums, so if it seems familiar...] My company is looking to implement 100% recording of inbound and outbound calls. We're pondering using Asterisk as a trunk-side monitoring system sitting between our Avaya Definity switch and our mixed bag of 6 T1 and PRI circuits. I've read with interest Matt Roth's thread on the Asterisk mailing list, however, since

I am so fed up with Digium cards. My company first owned a TE410P, I installed it in a Dell server and "enjoyed" its instability (we bought it months before Digium warned about the incompatibility issues). Then we switched to a TE411P for the hardware echo cancellation. Now we want to receive fax (< 20/day) on it and guess what ? Since April 2006 (again a few months after we bought

Hi Guys, I need your recommendation which card to buy?The TE411P or TE406P do they have any difference?I check their brochures they are differ only when it comes to PCI slot voltages.Which card best to use?Btw,Il be using supermicro board with 3.3V and 5.5V?Will il be experiencing problem during the implementation later on if i choose the wrong PCI voltage options?Will it depends on

Dear All, I have configured Cluster Suite with 2 servers Server 1 : 192.168.13.110 IP Address Server 2 : 192.168.13.179 IP Address Floating : 192.168.13.83 IP Address (Assumed by currently active server) I want all snmp packets going out through the active server to be stamped with floating IP So i have added a iptables rules as "iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -p udp -s

Hi all, 1. Just bought a new TE411P and about to install it replacing the existing TE410P. I am assuming I need to set echocancel=no and echocancelwhenbridged=no now that it will be done in hardware, correct? 2. Is there any way to monitor hardware echo cancellation to ensure it is working (apart from being on a call)? 3. The Digium webite says "By supporting 16ms with 128 channels or

Every once in a while calls get interrupted with a brief silence followed by a DTMF tone on our T1 lines. We are using a TE411P card. It does not happen on SIP connections, just the T1. Has anyone experienced this or know a possible cause? Thanks, -Bill

hi! anyone please recommend/guide me of purchasing a resonably high performance server system regarding processor(s) & motherboard (+ other compulsary peripherals i.e. VGA, Soundcard). Mentioning up-to-date vendor+model will be more helping I've to use Digium TE411p Quad E1 card signalling on the E1 is SS7 no. of simultaneouse calls is 100+ regards -------------- next part

I just setup CENTOS 4.7 with latest patches on DELL server. I also configured NTP point to out time server. I found /var/log/messages file every 20 to 30 minutes will generate a error message : Mar 15 14:28:15 SER1 ntpd[25037]: sendto(172.29.21.16): Invalid argument Mar 15 14:45:22 SER1 ntpd[25037]: sendto(172.29.21.16): Invalid argument Mar 15 15:02:29 SER1 ntpd[25037]: sendto(172.29.21.16):

I have a minimal installation of CentOS, and I wanted to then install X Windows and the GNOME desktop. I then tried the following, which failed on a dependency: $ yum -y groupinstall "X Window System" "GNOME Desktop Environment" --> Running transaction check ---> Package nautilus-sendto.i386 0:0.7-5.fc6 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency:

Hi all, I replaced a TE410P Rev C 1st Generation Firmware with a TE411P without any cfg changes (zaptel/zapata). As a result Asterisk crashes on outbound from PRI4 going to PRI1 calls: Aug 23 18:22:00 WARNING[4693]: chan_zap.c:7545 zt_pri_error: PRI: !! Got a UA, but i'm in state 1 Aug 23 18:22:00 WARNING[4693]: chan_zap.c:7545 zt_pri_error: PRI: !! Got a UA, but i'm in state 1

hi folks. i'm experimenting with iaxmodem + hylafax using DID to determine where to send the fax to it's final destination. however i have difficulties passing the DID information from iaxmodem to hylafax. in extensions.conf: exten => _XXXX,1,Dial(IAX2/iaxmodem0/${EXTEN}|20|r) exten => _XXXX,n,Dial(IAX2/iaxmodem1/${EXTEN}|20|r) exten => _XXXX,n,Busy exten => _XXXX,n,Hangup

I have a strange issue with roaming profiles. It only happens for users which has no roaming profile on a Samba server yet. When a user logs out for the first time, some files can't be copied from: C:\Documents and Settings\username\SendTo\ to a profiles directory on the server. (Files like 31/2Floppy(A).lnk, some *.tmp files etc.). Only very rarely, a first-time logout process happens

I am quite unfamiliar with DTrace (and even more with Solaris/Linux/other) kernel internals. I recently had to help look into an issue where an application apparently sent a UDP packet, but it did not appear on the wire, nor did snoop(1)ing the interface show it, so the assumption is that it was lost (or misdirected) somewhere in the IP stack. We did use Dtrace with syscall::sendto:entry/exit to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Anyone have a 1650 running successfully in production mode with 2-4 PRI's? I want to make sure I don't have a motherboard compatibility problem before I buy one of these. We are going to be using a Digium TE210P to start off with and probably moving to the TE411P down the road aways? thanks, Sean -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version:

I just implemented a system using a TE411P hardware echo cancellation card. Per Digium, I setup zaptel.conf, and zapata.conf the same way as I always have. To my surprise calls out to the PSTN had a terrible echo. 1 - 2 second delay, and quite clear. The echo was so bad that I had to remove the hardware echo cancellation module from the card. We are only using the 1st span of this card right

Hi; Through samba4 BDC server not update DNS record in PDC DNS server. please see logs 04-Jul-2012 10:22:19.800 client 192.253.8.25#1081: send 04-Jul-2012 10:22:19.800 client 192.253.8.25#1081: sendto 04-Jul-2012 10:22:19.800 client 192.253.8.25#1081: senddone 04-Jul-2012 10:22:19.800 client 192.253.8.25#1081: next 04-Jul-2012 10:22:19.800 client 192.253.8.25#1081: endrequest 04-Jul-2012

Howdy, I am using Apache 2.2 and Mongrel with great success. I have a mod_rewrite question and I am NO expert. I think it''s really simple but I haven''t nailed it. I was hoping someone here could help. I''m using Apache conf right out of the cluster example from the Mongrel site. I have a directory under my apps ''public'' directory called