similar to: what phones support this when running with asterisk

Oof, I didn't think about Clang not being in the same place. Perhaps we could put this in clang-tools-extra to solve that? As for the unification of the code bases. I was assuming we didn't want to just throw a ton of code over the wall anyway so the merge was going to need to be reviewed chunk by chunk anyhow. Support for the two formats should be possible to add in parallel (although, I

Okay, I am facing a move in two months to newly renovated space. I have to decide *this week* between: A) Pull LAN and phone cables, prepare to move and expand our "traditional" PBX (Panasonic KX-TD1232 and VPS200). or B) Pull only LAN cables, go VoIP, use Asterisk as PBX. It is *not* an option to purchase a VoIP system package from Cisco, 3com, etc. Installers are getting an

Hi, This is a bit off-topic, but still related to telephony. Is there a barebones TAPI driver that exists that would allow me to call up a command line with, as parameter, the number to dial. For exemple, Outlook integrates with TAPI, so that TAPI driver would allow me to call my own app with the phone number as argument. ex when clicking on 555-555-5555: the TAPI driver would call

Since the goal is to start llvm-tapi more or less from scratch, I feel the best approach initially is to focus on the structure as a key point of feedback in initial reviews. Once the foundations are set, integrating Mach-O TAPI in parallel with the ELF implementation should be relatively straightforward. The features outside of stubbing aren't as appealing for ELF, so I probably won't be

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 3:12 PM Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 2:42 PM Armando Montanez via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Since the goal is to start llvm-tapi more or less from scratch, I feel >> the best approach initially is to focus on the structure as a key >> point of

Hi, To make a long story short, I can't install any TAPI driver on my XP platform. A. Within Config Panel|Modems and Telephony options|Advanced parameters, I've got a list of 7 TAPI drivers. Among them is Omniis TAPI driver for Asterisk. B. I can properly configure this driver (line, context, ...). C. When I open Outlook 2002 Contacts panel, I can select "Call this contact"

Hello all, LLVM-TAPI seeks to decouple the necessary link-time information for a dynamic shared object from the implementation of the runtime object. This process will be referred to as dynamic shared object (DSO) stubbing throughout this proposal. A number of projects have implemented their own versions of shared object stubbing for a variety of reasons related to improving the overall linking

Absolutely. The goal of the tool is to produce both textual and binary DSO stubs. This means you could take a DSO, produce a textual stub, modify it however you wish, and then produce a linkable binary stub from that modified .tbe. That, or you could bypass the textual portion altogether and just produce binary stubs from DSOs. While the textual format is useful, the goal is to make the tool

I've been testing the debug version of AstTAPI, which worked for a few calls, then a bit later in the day (and ever since), when the call is hung up, the TAPI client doesn't get notified. Looking at the server logs, The TAPI message that is sent upon hangup, isn't being sent. exten => h,1,UserEvent(TAPI|TAPIEVENT: LINE_CALLSTATE LINECALLSTATE_IDLE) This is in the same context as

I just installed tapi and some app called identapop pro. I havent tested incoming calls yet but so far, I cant get calls out using outlooks. I configured TAPI for asterisk inside outlooks and I set TAPI to these configs: TAPI connects using the manager to asterisk without problems. As channels I configure this: User channel: SIP/myphone and the phone actually rings when I tell outlook to dial

Right. Usually you wouldn't want to write a .tbe from scratch, but for the sake of linking against a DSO you might only have access to a .tbe stub that was produced from the DSO. This specific functionality becomes critical when DSOs only used for linking are replaced entirely by .tbe stubs because at a SDK level the complete DSO isn't needed. This is what Apple has done to significantly

Adding Juergen to the thread. On Fri, Mar 15, 2019, 12:20 PM Shoaib Meenai via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Ping. > > > > Would anyone be opposed to me trying to revive the in-tree Mach-O TAPI > code? > > > > Thanks, > > Shoaib > > > > *From: *Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com> > *Date: *Wednesday, March 6, 2019 at

Hi Juergen, At a minimum I think adding the support to libobject, etc so the various llvm tools can read or even write files from/for OSX should be fairly non-controversial so how about go ahead and do that first (I'll happily review if you'd like) and then we can go from there to do anything else with TAPI and llvm? Sound good? -eric On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:01 PM Juergen Ributzka via

Hi all, It looks like Juergen landed the TextAPI libraries for Mach-O in https://reviews.llvm.org/D53945, and also had several follow-ups, but then it was deleted entirely by r347874. I'm not sure if the entire deletion was intentional, since the commit message only mentions reverting a certain series of patches; CC Hans. In any case, I'm wondering if there are plans to revive it, since

Hi @ll, Over the past years I have been looking into how to reduce the size of the SDK that ships with Xcode and how to improve build times for the overall OS inside Apple. The result is a tool called TAPI, which is used at Apple for all things related to text-based dynamic library files (.tbd). What are text-based dynamic library files? Text-based dynamic library files (TBDs) are a textual

I've finished a patched version of asttapi that will work with asterisk 1.2. There were fundamental changes to the Asterisk Management interface between 1.0 and 1.2 that broke asttapi. I think my patched version will work on 1.0 and 1.2 branches, but I have no way of testing since I don't have a 1.0 install nor do I want one :). I'm looking for testers, if anyone's willing to

Ok so I added to my Freepbx config running Asterisk 1.2.4 in extensions_custom.conf ; intercom exten => _7XXX,1,SIPAddHeader(Alert-Info: Auto Answer) exten => _7XXX,2,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:1},12,Tt) and configured my Polycoms via this page http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Polycom+auto-answer+config for auto answer and that works fine if I dial 7 then the 3 digit extension. No

Hi, Is there a reliable way to auto-dial SIP phones (specifically Polycom) with some sort of TAPI driver in Windows? I am aware of SIPTAPI, which makes the user's phone ring, and when picked up dials the desired number, but I (and more to the point, many of my customers) find this annoying. I'd like the phone to autodial on speakerphone (or headset if there is one), without any human

I am trying to use a the SIP tapi from www.enum.at <http://www.enum.at/> . This works fine from all kinds of applications which support TAPI, like outlook and Dialer Pro. However when making tapi controlled calls, the signaling to and from PSTN seems to fail. I have used the digium hardware ISDN PRI boards, but also a SIP gateway. Both result in a audio message from asterisk

Has anyone found a good wayt o do a gate intercom using Asterisk? I am looking at a Xorcom PBX with programmable contact, so I have no issue with opening the gate, but the interface at the gate is a bit tricky. I thought about a weather proof housing containing a phone but it seems a bit tacky. I also looked at a handsfree erather proof phone, but at $600 it is a bit steep. Any solutions that