similar to: Why so many attempts to native bridge?

I'm not a PRI expert and therefore don't know what this debug stuff means for PRI, so if anyone can help me here... I'm running the latest libpri and zaptel from CVS. Keep in mind that everything works fine when using the STABLE libpri and zaptel. I am NOT running CVS asterisk. I am running 1.0.6. asterisk*CLI> pri intense debug span 1 Enabled EXTENSIVE debugging on span 1 T203

Any ideas on this warning? If I call this number, sometimes I get this error and sometimes the call goes thru fine. Why would it work sometimes? -- Executing Goto("SIP/3044-8d49", "cytel-outgoing|915124512424|1") in new stack -- Goto (cytel-outgoing,915124512424,1) -- Executing SetCIDNum("SIP/3044-8d49", "2814494000") in new stack --

This just started happening today. I've got 1 queue and 6 agents. All logged in. I tell the service people to ignore my call if they see my caller id. I call the queue and watch as asterisk bounces me around the phones. Our agent ring time is 5 second timeout and a 5 second wait time before trying next agent. I get the same message in console for each agent attempt: -- Executing

Another example: Jerry Friedman's MART is available in R from Salford for the same price as the stand-alone TreeNet, even though they don't advertise it on their web site. Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: rossini at blindglobe.net [mailto:rossini at blindglobe.net] > Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 9:50 PM > To: rhelp > Cc: pralay at cytel.com > Subject: [R]

Hi, Can anyone suggest a way of doing the following in Asterisk 1.6.2 - I do not think it can be done trivially using TRANSFER_CONTEXT. What I want is for the TRANSFER_CONTEXT for all technologies to be the same as the initial context defined in the configuration of the device initiating the transfer. This is not as simple as it seems (unless I am missing something). For example: A call arrives

At JSM, I spent a bit of time with old friends at the Cytel booth (makers of StatXact/LogXact). They were wondering whether it was both feasible and of interest to create a package of the StatXact compute engine for R (to be commercially licensed, not for free!), similar to what they've done for SAS. As far as I know, it's feasible, (this is not the first commercial external package,

The setup: Inc SIP Call -> Asterisk 1 -- IAX --> Asterisk 2 -- SIP --> phone (3044) Asterisk 1 shows the following: (1.0.3) -- Executing Goto("SIP/XX.XX.XX.XX-0819f590", "cytel-internal|3044|1") in new stack -- Goto (cytel-internal,3044,1) -- Executing Dial("SIP/XX.XX.XX.XX-0819f590",

Hi, I've thoroughly searched the mailing list for a concrete example but haven't found one, thats why I end up here with my question. Theres has been some talk about IAX Transfers, but quite theoretically. Lets say there is a setup of several asterisk-boxes connected in a local Ethernet. Asterisk A establishes actively a connection to a SIP client B. When B picks up, the connection

Hi, I am in a weird situation where a variable seemed ignored, but not always. That variable is __TRANSFER_CONTEXT. Basically, I have a phone registered with asterisk. It's context is "internal". Outgoing calls go through that context (all good). When I get an incoming call which I want transferred, I don't want it to go through the context "internal" but

Hi, I want to check the status of a blind transfer (only sip endpoint) between various phones. Transfer is working perfectly, using ## from features.conf or using transfer key from phone, here SNOM320. My problem is that if party to transfer to is busy, the transfer fail and the call is ended. What I want to do is to return the call to the party who originate the transfer. I checked

hi, im looking at deploying asterisk in a small corporate enviroment which will have approx. 1200 IP Phones and an average of about 100 to 200 calls at any given time. The calls will be sent out SIP to my Cisco Gateway. Im running Asterisk on a Dell Dual P3 1.2ghz running Fedora. Is there a calculator or a spreadsheet which could tell me about how many calls I will be able to make through *

Hello R help members. I came across today with an article on Barnard's exact test (http://www.cytel.com/Papers/twobinomials.pdf), that is supposed to give a more powerful fisher.test - Because it doesn't assume that we know the row and column totals are in advance. Any pointers to such a function ? Thanks, Tal -- ---------------------------------------------- My contact information:

Hi all, There's been a few posts looking for telemarketer torture scripts so I figured that I would write one using a SQLite db. Handling an incoming call that is flagged from the database is pretty simple. My problem is that I would like the callee on an established channel to be able to redirect the caller to a specific context where my AGI is called and handles the call by first

Dear R folks, We completed a matched case-control study that was analyzed using conditional logistic regression. Because of the small sample size we need to calculate exact confidence intervals. The quick solution is to purchase LogExact by Cytel. However, we'd like to do this in R. Anyone have experience with this? Many thanks, Tomas ____________________________________ Tomas Aragon, MD,

Thanks Guus I have one more question. - We see several log messages that we dont currently understand - Can you comment on what they mean and if they are concerning? I've obfuscated IP's and node names so please ignore those. Our tinc daemon command is: tincd -n <vpn name> -- Received short packet -- Got REQ_KEY from node003 while we already started a SPTPS session! -- Invalid

Hello all, I need help about smbiod, i have mounted samba server from linux client with command "mount -t smbfs -o username=root //10.10.x.x/folder /dest" and then the client ask about password, and it works, but when i copy files in the middle of the process suddenly it stoped, then i run command "top" i see "smbiod" use verry high cpu usage(more than 90%). Is

This comment comes up fairly regularly and is confusing people. Why doesn't it say that it failed so we know? The way it is now it kind of leaves you hanging there and you don't know if the transfer happened or not. And why was it even attempted if it is obvious that transfer is off? (I know it can depend on the remote side.) -----Original Message----- From:

Well, it is clear enough that the problem is in interpreting the documentation. However, when you claim you tested something, and found it inconsistent with tables, it would be advisable to back it up with examples! The description in the help files and in the sources is admittedly confusing. The original paper has this, rather more clear, description in the abstract: "We consider the

We cannot help you understand what you are doing if you do not show us what you are doing. Here are some discussions about how to communicate questions about R [1][2][3]. [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/how-to-make-a-great-r-reproducible-example [2] http://adv-r.had.co.nz/Reproducibility.html [3] https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/reprex/index.html -- Sent from my phone.

Hi all, when doing a blind transfer using the keys defined in features.conf, we hear a confirmation of the attempt to blindly transfer, followed by an invalid extension message. The console says this: [Jun 4 22:30:31] VERBOSE[11301] res_musiconhold.c: -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on SIP/570-00000006 [Jun 4 22:30:31] VERBOSE[11301] file.c: --