similar to: Re: cyrus-imapd server

We are trying to move our mail store from a host running cyrus-imapd 2.2.12 under CentOS-4 to one running 2.3.16 under CentOS-6. The current host is a 32 bit architecture. The new host is 64 bit. We have followed the update guide found at: http://www.cyrusimap.org/docs/cyrus-imapd/2.3.16/install-upgrade.php The steps we followed were: 1. Install cyrus-imapd et al on the new host. 2. Modify

On Mon, September 14, 2015 14:51, James B. Byrne wrote: > The Logwatch imapd service script distributed with CentOS-6 does not > generate anything when I run logwatch --service all on a cyrus-imapd > host. Is this expected behaviour? Is there a separate script for > cyrus-imapd or are their configuration options required to get the > existing script to work. > > I have found

Has anyone on this list got sendmail and cyrus-imapd configured so that email addressed in the form username+folder at example.com gets delivered directly to cyrus' user.username.inbox.folder? I have been tinkering with this on and off for about a week and no matter what I have tried, all traffic addressed in the +folder format ends up in user.username.inbox instead. If anyone has gotten

CentOS-4.8 cyrus-imapd-2.2.12-10 sendmail-8.13.1-3.3 I have a mail hub which uses cyrus-imap with sendmail It has worked well for us on this and prior hosts going back to 1995. And, I do not have a problem with the current setup. What I would like to do however, is to deliver plus-formatted e-mail addresses directly to users subfolders in their mailbox tree. Such addresses take the form

The Logwatch imapd service script distributed with CentOS-6 does not generate anything when I run logwatch --service all on a cyrus-imapd host. Is this expected behaviour? Is there a separate script for cyrus-imapd or are their configuration options required to get the existing script to work. I have found an ancient (2004) logwatch service script for cyrus-imapd but I was sort of hoping that

I am trying to get cyrus-imapd and saslauthd running together so that I can get squirrelmail to work. I have accomplished this on several other servers and have relatively complete documentation on how to do this. What I am running into in this case has me baffled. If I start saslauthd as a service: # service saslauthd start And I try testsaslauthd -u cyrus -p test Then I see this: 0: NO

On Mon, September 14, 2015 21:28, Always Learning wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 14:51 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > >> The Logwatch imapd service script distributed with CentOS-6 does not >> generate anything when I run logwatch --service all on a cyrus-imapd >> host. Is this expected behaviour? Is there a separate script for >> cyrus-imapd or are their

We are at the stage, finally, where we are prepared to deploy public facing VM guests. Now we have to answer these questions: How many guests in total should we contemplate and what services are placed on which guests? My question comes down to whether it is considered advisable to run the primary DNS and IMAP, or indeed all services, on separate vm guests; or should we continue, more or less,

I am trying to get a logwatch summary emailed to a central address from a cron job. The tasd was copied verbatim from a system which does this already. Both are shown below. host1 crontab -l as root 45 7 * * * /usr/sbin/logwatch --service http --service imapd --service pop3 --service sshd --service vsftpd --service zz-disk_space --service zz-network --service zz-sys --mailto support at

On Thu, September 7, 2017 14:07, hw wrote: > Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 09/07/2017 08:11 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >>> This was always problematic because DNS hostnames and >>> email addresses in the RFC standards were case insensitive >> >> >> Not quite. SMTP is required to treat the "local-part" of the RCPT >> argument as

We use Cyrus-imapd together with Postix to effect final delivery of email messages to our clients. The final delivery server is isolated from the internet via a firewall and only pre-authorized host addresses can connect. All user pickup and delivery email traffic is handled through separate Internet accessible hosts that may establish these connections. The Internet facing hosts have Postfix

Hi, It will be bug on &.2 but we are facing this issue on CentOS 6.8. In 6.8 also has this issue? Please suggest. Regards, Shagun -----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of centos-request at centos.org Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 5:30 PM To: centos at centos.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] CentOS Digest, Vol 161, Issue 22 Send CentOS mailing list

I would like to burn the cd-rom iso's of CentOS-5.0 on my desktop machine, which is running CentOS-4.5. Is there a site or other reference that can provide me with a detailed, hand held, step-by-step, blow-by-blow description on how to do this for my installation? Regards, -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at

On Thu, June 16, 2016 13:53, Walter H. wrote: > On 15.06.2016 16:17, Warren Young wrote: >> but it also affects the other public CAs: you can???t get a >> publicly-trusted cert for a machine without a publicly-recognized >> and -visible domain name. For that, you still need to use >> self-signed certs or certs signed by a private CA. >> > A private CA is the

I am contemplating converting some of our internal networks from routable to private IPv4 address space. I have a question about RIP as implemented under Cisco IOS 12.x. Presently the setting for rip is: router rip version 2 passive-interface [[FastEthernet]]0/0 network aaa.bbb.ccc.0 no auto-summary What I would like to know is how one routes the entire 192.168/16 address space using rip.

On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:18:33 +0100, Jujo <jujo at jujo.info> wrote: > On the other hand I have a little problem when logging in > squirrelmail from address http://mail.domain.com and not from > http://www.domain.com/webmail but I will post it from house when > I have all information available. > This is likely to be an Apache rewrite problem and not, as was later

Does anyone here use a Samba4 setup for single sign-on for MS_Win workstations and CentOS-6 boxes? Does anyone here use it for imap and/or smtp authentication? We are experimenting with replacing our existing Microsoft domain controllers with Samba4 based controllers and are contemplating moving all authentication for all our systems, Microsoft and CentOS based, over to Samba when, or if, this

After a long, and quite disheartening, series of hardware problems with my HP laptop I decided to try out a Mac (late 2009 Intel based 19.5 inch). In the months since January past I have discovered this to be no significant improvement and I have grown tired of the persistent wireless connectivity problems and am totally put off by the upgrade to OSX-10.6.4 which killed HD graphics using Open-Gl.

We deployed our first CentOS-4 based workstation this past spring to see if we can conveniently replace all, or at least most, of our MS-Win based user systems with Linux boxes instead. Generally this trial unit has proved a success but there is one lingering problem that I cannot seem to find a straight-forward answer to: Is there an administrator override to a user's password protected

I am contemplating getting a couple of these for company use. However, I am also trying to wean our entire company away from MicroSoft (and from Apple for that matter). So, I would like to use one of these systems to try out CentOS as an alternative OS. Does anyone here have any experience with running CentOS-6 (RHEL6) on this computer? Is any of the hardware rendered inoperative or otherwise