similar to: DID in Western Canada

Hi, I have trouble getting MOH to work after an upgrade from asterisk 1.4 to 1.6.1.4. The call goes on hold, MOH is started, and then stops right away. Here are the files both of type .raw: Tsunami*CLI> moh show files Class: default File: /etc/asterisk/musiconhold/Fr?d?ric Chopin - Polonaises Op. 40-2 File: /etc/asterisk/musiconhold/Fr?d?ric Chopin - Polonaises Op. 40-1 These files

I'm looking at switching VOIP providers, but want to ensure I move to a company with sufficient capacity. Can any Canadian VOIP users post/email me with feedback on their providers? I'll post the results for all to read...... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Are there any 800 DID number providers for Alberta? -- #Joseph

Hello; I wrote this simple loop pass to collect the number of instructions in each loop of the program. The code is as follows- #define DEBUG_TYPE "loopinst" #include "llvm/Pass.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPass.h" #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h" #include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h" #include "llvm/Instructions.h" #include

Hi, > Problem solved. I was building llvm in a separate llvm-build directory. I > built it within the llvm-src directory (which kept all the llvm .so and my > pass' .so in the llvm-src/Release+Asserts/lib directory) to solve the > problem. I do not fully understand what you mean, there should be no difference on building out of source AFAIK. > Can anyone tell me what's

Hello, Recently, the following problem started happening with a particular samba server: If i have a file open for reading (say, a pdf in xpdf) and then try to write to it (say, through recompiling a latex document) it complains that it cannot open the file for writing. this seems like a file lock issue but I am unsure where it is happening. My previous usage should be perfectly safe since

Hello all; So here is my goal: *** If there is a Call instruction to myFunction(int * val), I need to identify all the instructions that uses val in the IR and replace the uses with a newly created pointer. I will also be changing the argument of myFunction to the new pointer. int * val = malloc/calloc; ... myFunction(val); .... *val = 45; becomes== int * val = malloc/calloc; int * val1 =

Problem solved. I was building llvm in a separate llvm-build directory. I built it within the llvm-src directory (which kept all the llvm .so and my pass' .so in the llvm-src/Release+Asserts/lib directory) to solve the problem. Can anyone tell me what's the difference between writing a pass as a "struct" (as in the tutorial) and as a "class" (as most developers do)?

Hey, folk. I am trying to get many figures by using the function "xyplot" in the library "lattice". I tried to using the loop to finish it quickly. But I cannot open the saved file after I run the program. But if I use the function "plot" to get other simply figures, it can work. So I want to ask how I can get the saved figures by using "xyplot". The

Hello; I wanted to insert two new terminator instructions in LLVM IR. I modified the necessary files (as mentioned in the tutorial in LLVM site and some more to meet the new structure of LLVM, (e.g no Lexer.l now, we have LLLexer.cpp. Again in the tutorial, files like LLVMBitCodes.h, include/llvm-c/core.h that need to be modified are not mentioned) But I am getting the error while building

Hi; I was playing with the -lda pass of LLVM on the following program- #include <stdio.h> void main() { int a[10]; int i; for(i = 0; i < 4; i ++) { a[i] = a[i-1]+1; } } I run the following commands - clang a.c -emit-llvm -S opt -analyze -stats -lda a.s The output is - Printing analysis 'Loop Dependence Analysis': Loop at depth 1, header block: %for.cond Load/store

On Dec 21, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Bob Wilson wrote: >> To get some idea about the number of people who could be involved in a >> project like this, I would like to ask for a quick show of hands: Who would >> be interested in contributing code to LLVM-with-profiling? (Either actual >> profiling code, or passes that use profiling information.) >> Who would want to use the

Thanks for the reply. For the source code: int main() { int a = 0; int *p; p = &a; call_arnamoy(p); int *p1; p1 = p; return 1; } The bit code: %retval = alloca i32, align 4 %a = alloca i32, align 4 %p = alloca i32*, align 8 %p1 = alloca i32*, align 8 store i32 0, i32* %retval store i32 0, i32* %a, align 4 store i32* %a, i32** %p, align 8 %0 = load i32** %p, align 8 %call = call i32

I think I understood the problem you're trying to solve. I didn't, however, understand the problems you are having (maybe you're not running mem2reg?). I do have a little piece of code that I think does (more or less) what you want. Take a look at it, try understanding it, and see if it helps you out. You might have to change it a bit since you're replacing uses after an

Hi; I was wondering how can I get the name of the bitcode file on which I am running the pass. I am making my pass as a loadable module. And if I run my pass like this - opt -S -loops -load /home/arnie/llvm-clang/llvm/Release+Asserts/lib/XYZ.so -xyz <b.bc> b1.bc I want to get b.bc in the pass. Thank you; -- Arnamoy Bhattacharyya Athabasca Hall 143 Department of Computing Science -

Hello, Can R do factor analysis using eigenvalue greater than one to automatically determine the number of factors to extract? I am afraid that R cannot provide the function we want. But I can use R to write a function to do the specific factor analysis. Because the functions needed for developing the factor analysis is provided by R, it should be easy to write the factor analysis. I

We are running multiple SAMBA servers but they all access the same printers, so I would like to copy the config files (as there are about 100 printers) from the main server to the others so that al the attached drivers and comments and such are intact. Any ideas on this one? BTW Our servers are running Solaris8, Linux (red hat 7.2), etc... -- -Broderick Wood- Analyst, Systems Support Group

Hello I am trying to install R 2.6.0 on a SGI Origin 350 running IRIX 6.5 6.5.28f R was configured with the following options: > --x-includes=/usr/include/X11 > --x-libraries=/usr/lib/X11 > --includedir=/usr/freeware/include > --includedir=/usr/freeware/lib32 > --includedir=/usr/freeware/lib64 > --with-readline=no > --with-iconv=no > CC=cc gmake complied

Hi all; I have been trying to use the llvm::ConstantArray::get(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::StringRef, bool) function but seems it has been deprecated. ProfileDependence.cpp:68:73: error: no matching function for call to ‘llvm::ConstantArray::get(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::StringRef, bool)’ ProfileDependence.cpp:68:73: note: candidate is:

On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > On Dec 21, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Bob Wilson wrote: > > >> To get some idea about the number of people who could be involved in a > >> project like this, I would like to ask for a quick show of hands: Who > would > >> be interested in contributing code to LLVM-with-profiling? (Either