similar to: This cpu usage doesn't seem right.

We have asterisk running on a quad processor dell. The kernel has been compiled with SMP. However, asterisk seems to only use 1 processor. 3 of the 4 always stay at 100% idle. Is it pointless to have a multi-proc machine? I was going to buy a new dual 3.6Ghz Xeon server but if nothing will take advantage of the other proc... Perhaps my conception of multi-proc/threaded is warped. If asterisk is

This is frustrating. Asterisk has crashed now twice today and neither crash has produced a core file. My ulimit is unlimited. I'm using safe_asterisk so asterisk is restarting immediatly, but how the hell am I suposed to find out wtf happened with no core file? Debug log doesn't say anything either. AGRHHHHHHHH -Matthew --

Per my conversation below with digium, are there any legal alternatives to digium's G729? It is out of date, and doesn't support VAD nor silence detection. Digium has stated that they have no plans to update it anytime soon. VAD/Silence is a big deal with major carriers and we are having to fight a battle to get them to make special arrangements to turn off VAD/Silence in their

All of the stuff I've googled for and read on wiki all relate to "Outlook". Has anyone been successful in getting "Outlook Express" to do click to dial? -Matthew -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Matthew Boehm, IT Director Cypress Telecommunications mboehm@cytelcom.com 3838 N. Sam Houston

All, I get this whenever trying to dial to a peer when the peer registered to another server. I'm basically trying to use realtime to check for the peer and dial it. Mar 24 09:16:47 VERBOSE[4527]: -- Executing Dial("SIP/brak-f69f", "IAX2/brak-test/107") in new stack Mar 24 09:16:47 DEBUG[4527]: MySQL RealTime: Retrieve SQL: SELECT * FROM sip_users WHERE name =

Even though they make the cards and advertise that they support data modes, digium won't support data mode on the $500 card they sold to me, so I must turn to the list. Has anyone configured a T100P to use a T1 strictly as bandwidth? Is there a HOWTO somewhere? Wiki has nothing I could find. I've got plently of public IPs I can assign to it but don't know how. Thanks, Matthew -----

Hey guys, I sent an email to the list at 2:57PM central. I just now see it on the list, and its 3:23PM. Anyone else experience this? I am sending this email at 3:24PM central. Lets see when it gets posted to the list. -Matthew

I don't know...now I have a _X. in my CDR. -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Boehm [mailto:mboehm@cytelcom.com] Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 8:05 PM To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List <asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] SetVarCDR You must have some fux0red config 'cause using _X. works fine here. I haven't had an 's' in my CDRs for

Hey gang, There must be any easy solution for this but my mind is frazzled on compiling 2.4 with RTC as module. Bleh. Currently extension 9000 is our VoicemailMain(@company) line. Some employee's are complaining that the old system was better because you didn't have to enter your mailbox number and that instead the old system took you right to it. I figured there was something similar

Hello guys, to describe my scenario i have 4 VLANS on my switch, each VLAN is different subject. I have one DHCP server for 3 VLANS + second one DHCP server for 1 VLAN - named VLAN 7 . Problem is , this started to make problems suddenly. VLAN 7 is not recieving IP adress from correct DHCP server . On DHCP server where declaration for subnet is configured, i am recieving this message : Jul 25

Hey gang, We have about 30 Cisco 79XX phones all running latest 7.5 SIP. We are also using all Cisco Switches and Routers. Everything works great except that when you reboot a phone it takes like 3-5 minutes for it to come up. The phones spend tons of time 'Configuring VLAN..' We don't run any VLANs. Is there some way to skip this? In the 'Network Settings' I have

I've read the Wiki on using asterisk's built-in transfer options (#8 and #6). They work fine but how does one cancle an attended transfer? Example: I have person on phone, I hit #6 to being att-transfer. I enter Sally's extension. I let it ring for a few seconds. Sally never picks up but her voicemail does. How do I hangup her voicemail and resume the previous call? The example on the

Hi All, We have upgraded the dovecot from 1.0 to 1.2.8. After upgradation we have noticed that dovecot deliver process is utilizing a lot of CPU. As a result the mailsystem will stop working. When we limit the no of procs in postfix for dovecot deliver the CPU usage will come down. But we are not facing this problem with the previous version. Below is the log files for dovecot when the error

I'm trying to figure out what's causing an average system load of 3+ to 5+ on an Intel quad core. The server has with 2 KVM guests (assigned 1 core and 2 cores) that's lightly loaded (0.1~0.4) each. Both guest/host are running 64bit CentOS 5.6 Originally I suspected maybe it's i/o but on checking, there is very little i/o wait % as well. Plenty of free disk space available on all

Hello to all. I'm trying to implement a simple register allocator using graph colouring (I know, everyone has already done that :-)) and I'm also using LLVM 3.4 from master branch. The algorithm I'm using is based on the one described on the "Modern Compiler Implementation in C". My implementation is totally experimental and doesn't aim to be fast, eficient or even

I have a quad core CPU running Centos5. When I use top, I see that running processes use 245% instead of 100%. If I use gkrellm, I just see one core being used 100%. top: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SWAP SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 18037 thba 31 15 304m 242m 62m 44m R 245.3 4.1 148:58.72 ic Also in the log of some programs I see this strange factor: CPU Seconds = 2632

On Sep 17, 2013, at 5:15 AM, Leandro Santiago <leandrosansilva at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello to all. I'm trying to implement a simple register allocator using graph colouring (I know, everyone has already done that :-)) and I'm also using LLVM 3.4 from master branch. > > The algorithm I'm using is based on the one described on the "Modern Compiler Implementation in

Hey gang, We currently have a class 3 switch (CSX) that..well..it sucks. It does terrible CDR writes, doesn't support LCR, the list goes on and on. We want to replace this with several asterisk boxes each running one or two 4 port PRI cards. The problem is: I can plug in 20 PRI lines into the CSX (from PSTN) and have 1 come from CSX into asterisk. If 1 call comes in on each of the 20 pris,

OK. I just downloaded asterisk-1.0.3.tar.gz and did a 'cvs co -r v1-0 asterisk' into 2 seperate directories. I then did 'diff -ur asterisk-cvs/ asterisk-1.0.3/' and there were source code line differences between the two. Some code that was in asterisk-cvs wasn't in asterisk-1.0.3 and vice versa. Which of those is "the most recent"? If someone wants to use cvs to

Lets say that I have 9 phones with extensions 1 thru 9. (All SIP) Parking extension is set to 700. When I try to park a call to 700 as soon as I press the 7 key (to start typing 700) the person at extension 7's phone rings. So instead of transferring to extension 700, it went to 7. How can I slow down the response time of * to let me get to 700? Thanks, Matthew