Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Flash hook not going through SPA-2002"
2005 Jun 09
0
Flash Hook won't work with Asterisk@Home and SPS-2002
Greetings,
I have one PSTN line connected to my Asterisk@ Home box with call
waiting. I also have an SPA-2002 connected to an analog phone. When I am
calling on the PSTN and a call waiting beep comes through, I can hear it,
but when I press the flash key, nothing happens. It is as if the Sipura is
not passing the flash through. I monitor the asterisk box with the
verbosity turned up, but
2007 Aug 19
0
flash zap FXO port from SIP device (SPA-2002) using RFC2833 or SIP INFO
Sorry if this was posted yesterday, I was having issues with being
auto-unsubscribed because of my spam filter. Not sure if my post made it
through.
Hi everyone,
I'm wondering if I'm missing something obvious here, or if Asterisk just
doesn't support what I'm trying to do. It seems like it should be
simple, but appearances can be deceiving.
I've got an Asterisk box
2007 Apr 10
1
help with Sipura SPA 3000
Hi there everyone!
I've bought a Sipura SPA 3000, and succesfully connected it to my Mac, where
I installed Asterisk 1.4.0. Both ports (FXO and FXS) are well configured).
However, living in Brazil, I'd like to know if there are optimal settings to
my PSTN that I should enter into the config of the device. I experience a
little bit of echo on the FXO probably because I raised the gain of
2005 Sep 29
0
dtmfmode type
I've noticed that Asterisk only supports the following DTMF modes:
inband, rfc2833, info, auto.
Auto mode is broken.
Though, Sipura unit have the following options:
inband
AVT
info
auto
Inband + info
AVT + info
What is AVT?
How does for example "inband + info" works, it either/or?
--
#Joseph
2018 Oct 22
1
OPUS at Texas Instruments C6418
Hi Jean-Marc,
thank you for that suggestion!
It seems that the file "fixed_c6x.h" is not part of the Opus sources, so the compiler cannot find it after enabling the TI_C6X_ASM config option.
Maybe it was only part of an early version of the Opus sources?
I looked for the file in versions V1.1, V1.1.1, V1.2alpha and V1.3 but did not found it.
Do you have an idea, where I can get the
2018 Oct 22
0
OPUS at Texas Instruments C6418
Hi Robert,
The file is not distributed in the official releases, but I can find it
in the git repository.
Cheers,
Jean-Marc
On 10/22/2018 03:53 AM, Robert Madinger wrote:
> Hi Jean-Marc,
>
> thank you for that suggestion!
> It seems that the file "fixed_c6x.h" is not part of the Opus sources, so the compiler cannot find it after enabling the TI_C6X_ASM config option.
2018 Oct 19
2
OPUS at Texas Instruments C6418
Dear Opus family,
we have implemented the Opus codec at a Texas Instruments DSP C6418.
It is working fine!
Does anyone has experience with the configuration of the codec for a speed optimized implementation on that DSP?
At the moment, we use the following settings:
#define NONTHREADSAFE_PSEUDOSTACK 1
#define FIXED_POINT
2004 Aug 06
0
I-D ACTION:draft-herlein-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt (fwd)
All:
The latest draft RTP Payload Format for Speex is available via
the IETF. See below for details.
Greg
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 15:56:23 -0500
From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
To: IETF-Announce: ;
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-herlein-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
<p>
2018 Oct 19
0
OPUS at Texas Instruments C6418
Hi Robert,
There's also a TI_C6X_ASM config option, that causes the fixed_c6x.h
header to be used, but I think it hasn't been tested in years. I don't
know if it still works, but if not it's probably not too hard to fix
(patch welcome). The fixed_c6x.h file can also probably be extended to
cover more of the C6x arithmetic operators. Beyond that, you'd have to
go to
2004 Sep 13
0
[AVT] Open Speech Repository (fwd)
interesting for anyone testing out speex :)
kfish.
----- Forwarded message from Alan Clark <alan.d.clark@telchemy.com> -----
From: Alan Clark <alan.d.clark@telchemy.com>
To: avt@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:57:01 -0400
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
Subject: [AVT] Open Speech Repository
We've started to build a database of speech samples in
2006 Jan 12
3
linksys SPA-941
does anyone get a hold of the SPA-941 Provisioning Guide?
i tried call Sipura's tech support, seems like none of
them heard of the term "remote provisioning". they kept
refering me to their web site which i've check thoroughly,
and could not find any documentations on the SPA-941. finally
they gave me a phone number to call, which appears to be a fax
machine. that's when i
2005 Jun 16
1
Cisco 7960 (SIP) with Asterisk: how to get # to work during a call
Gents,
I've built an Asterisk system to replace our PBX at work and have Cisco
7960 phones (SIP 7.4) running with Asterisk 1.0.7.
How to I get Asterisk to recognise the '#' being pressed during a call?
In sip.conf I have entries likle this:
[2001]
type=friend
context=local-phone
auth=md5
username=2001
secret=xyzzy
callerid=Jack Tubby <2001>
2003 Jan 07
3
Vorbis RTP Internet Draft
Hi all,
Below is the Vorbis RTP Internet Draft as sent to the AVT working group
of the IETF.
Comments and feedback is still welcomed from the Vorbis community.
Cheers
Phil
---------------------------8<-----------------8<------------------------
Network Working Group Phil Kerr
Internet-Draft The Ogg Vorbis
January 07, 2003 Community / OpenDrama
2003 Jun 05
1
Updated Vorbis-RTP Internet Draft
Hi All,
Please find below an updated Vorbis-RTP Internet Draft document for
review and discussion at the Xiph IRC meeting on Saturday.
The changes in this version have been:
Codebook caching mechanism
Expanded SDP parameters
Expanded MIME section
Expanded introduction
Packet loss section
Minor tweaks and clarity changes to text
There are probably some minor tweaks to the formatting needed
2006 Jun 21
1
SPA-2002 call HANGUP. May be a SIP bug.
Hello,
We have problems with Asterisk and Sipura SPA-2002.
SPA is behind the NAT. Asterisk has nat=yes.
Sometimes call doesn't hangup when user finish the call and hangup the
headset.
In this case during all conversation SIP packets contains
Call-ID: bee522ee-8efa7d25@123.123.123.123
but the final BYE packet from adapter contains
Call-ID: bee522ee-8efa7d25@10.0.0.2
Is such
2004 Dec 21
0
SIP dtmf=rfc2833 not working
We are testing some DTMF-driven applications over VOIP (legacy systems
which use fast pulses of standard DTMF tones).
The applications work fine when Digium IAXy's are used - no loss or
garbling of DTMF tones.
However, when we use SIP modems (such as Sipura 1000's), the DTMF tones
are frequently uninterpretable and our applications have to ask for
retries.
I am under the impression that
2009 Feb 27
3
ietf discussion about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> Hi Aymeric,
>
> Yes, I'm receiving the emails but haven't had enough time to look into
> the details yet. I've seen you responded to many comments, so what are
> the ones for which we still need to respond?
Summary is there:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/ballot/2837/
As I understand:
we need to change
2004 Dec 16
0
FW: Cisco 7960 (SIP) hold problems
ala cisco 7960
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Schulte
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 10:34 AM
To: 'Paul A Brown'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 (SIP) hold problems
Sure thing, the biggest problem I had was getting the SIP filenames
working correctly for updating the firmware (blah, I love Cisco but
these phones are a joke for support). This works for me! Good luck.
2009 Feb 27
5
ietf discussion about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex
Hi Jean-Marc, Alfred and Greg,
Are you receiving the mails from IETF about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex
The mails are not coming from AVT mailing list, but I think we are
all 3 part of a minimal list (draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex at tools.ietf.org)
dedicated to latest discussion about the draft.
I have answered some questions, but there are small changes and adaptation
still required to the ietf
2005 Oct 05
2
Sipura Adapter SPA-2002
Hello. Has anyone run into problems accessing voicemail with the Sipura
SPA-2002's?
Our SPA-2000's work fine (registers fine, able to make and receive calls
properly & also able to access voicemail). We've configured the 2002's
exactly the same way. However, with the SPA-2002 we're unable to access
the voicemail system (though it does register fine and is able to