similar to: ATTN: Keith

Kind of spawns an interesting side topic though..... I recommend SpamHaus.org for a good blacklist.... Easy to integrate into most mail servers and you can't beat free... Cheers, Wiley -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:40 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing

Some lists and emails are distributed via ns1.samba.org. For those of you that use ORBS, you'll find it is blacklisted now. There is no mention of it on the website and it doesn't return a positive when you enter it for testing but it has slipped into the ORBS blacklist somewhere. Samba.org admins may wish to force all ns1 outbound email via another netblock, bringing it up to ORBS only

On Friday, June 10, 2005 3:16 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith [SMTP:akohlsmith-asterisk@benshaw.com] wrote: > On Friday 10 June 2005 04:08, Terry H. Gilsenan wrote: > > Received: from source ([81.56.129.44]) by exprod5mx8.postini.com > > ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:29:16 PDT > > > > Your MTA claimed it was called "SOURCE" but rDNS tells the recipient

I am ready, regarding to, http://bb.pgr.jp/ On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:54 AM Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > Meant to send this yesterday, but I want to remind everyone that we’re > going to be raising the CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 next week. > > If you maintain bots please ensure that your bots are updated by end of > day 5/29 so that we can move on 5/30

All the MIPS buildbots are ready too. From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of NAKAMURA Takumi via llvm-dev Sent: 25 May 2016 23:03 To: Chris Bieneman; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org; lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [Attn: Bot Owners!] Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 I am ready, regarding to, http://bb.pgr.jp/ On

I am using an example posted in this help forum to work with a file. the head of the file looks like: 988887 2007-03-05 2007-06-01 90 3 5.450 205500.00 999.00 999.000 0.000 0 0 988887 2007-03-06 2007-06-01 90 3 5.450 205500.00 999.00 999.000 0.000 1 0 988887 2007-03-07 2007-06-01 90 3 5.450 205500.00 999.00 999.000 -0.100 2 0 988887 2007-03-08 2007-06-01 90 3 5.450 205500.00 999.00 999.000 -0.100

Meant to send this yesterday, but I want to remind everyone that we’re going to be raising the CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 next week. If you maintain bots please ensure that your bots are updated by end of day 5/29 so that we can move on 5/30 (next Monday). I have already heard from most bot owners either saying they had made the change, or scheduled to make it. If you have any questions or

[Probax] Joshua Coyle P 1300 885 117 E joshua.coyle at probax.io<mailto:joshua.coyle at probax.io> W probax.io<http://www.probax.io/> A QV1 Perth, Level 33/250 St Georges Tce, Perth WA 6000 smart safe local cloud From: Joshua Coyle Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 3:27 PM To: 'gluster-devel at gluster.org' <gluster-devel at gluster.org> Subject: ATTN:

you can not ping that address because ICMP is turned off. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Deon Rodden Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 2:22 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice problems again Attn: James Greetings, C:\>ping 147.135.8.129 Pinging

> -----Original Message----- > From: S.Bob > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 2:26 PM > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [Off topic] sending mail from Comcast was: Sendmail not working > > I followed this guide: > > > https://pepipost.com/tutorials/install-sendmail-server-centos-7/ Sigh - bad examples for you.... undo if you can. Postfix provides the

> -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Evans > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 12:50 PM > > On 4/19/20 12:38 PM, S.Bob wrote: > > > > On 4/19/20 10:36 AM, Tim Evans wrote: > >> On 4/19/20 12:28 PM, S.Bob wrote: > >>> All; > >>> > >>> > >>> I installed sendmail via yum, but if I test it like this: > >>>

> -----Original Message----- > From: S.Bob > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 2:52 PM > > > > I get this: > > # rpm -qf `which sendmail` > postfix-2.10.1-7.el7.x86_64 > sendmail-8.14.7-5.el7.x86_64 > yum erase sendmail # undo what you did before... yum reinstall postfix # just in case it is messed up rpm -V postfix # lets verify if postfix is ok systemctl

Keith Roberts, Thank you for your suggestion about doing a grep of the source code. We found mmap.S in ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386. We looked in mmap.S and found a lot of assembly code. Could you please tell us if any of the assembly code call the kernel syscall handler for mmap.s? Also, we ran make for the kernel Makefile and we obtained the following result shown below. Could you please

I wonder if someone could explain why, when I perform confirmatory factor-analysis model using polychoric correlations why I do not get an estimated confidence interval for the RMSEA. My experience with these type models is that I would obtain a confidence interval estimate. I did not get any warning messages with the output. RESULTS: Model Chisquare = 1374 Df = 185 Pr(>Chisq) = 0

Hi, i have uploaded a little gz compressed tarball http://scdbackup.webframe.org/block_seq.tgz containing -rwxr-xr-x thomas/thomas 4552 2017-03-21 09:23 block_seq -rw-r--r-- thomas/thomas 315 2017-03-21 09:22 block_seq.c To be unpacked in a suitable directory by tar xvzf block_seq.tgz The binary "block_seq" was compiled on Debian Jessie. If it does not run, do cc -o

See other thread/reply. > -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS <centos-bounces at centos.org> On Behalf Of S.Bob > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 3:11 PM > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [Off topic] sending mail from Comcast was: Sendmail not working > > OK, I've fired up a new VM, new CentOS 7 install, now I get this: > > # rpm -qf

TO everyone who is making use of unicode_hacks! I have made irreversible changes to the plugin so that the routings are no longer overloaded. To call the character-bound routines, you need to use the "chars" or "u" accessors, as outlined in the docs http://julik.nl/code/unicode-hacks/index.html and in this blog post by Thijs:

The Wiki page has been SSL-only for a few days to a week or so. [perhaps this is by design, I don't know - but it is different than it was a week or more ago.] But the link to it from the main samba.org page is wrong and the suggested link doesn't get you to the wiki either. [It goes to CIFS.ORG.] Most of us can find our way - but it probably needs addressing sometime soon. -Greg

Ivo, Your patch number 16347 uses _fseeki64 when _WIN32 is defined. Unfortunately, MinGW (or at least the Linux -> Win32 cross compiler I'm using) defines _WIN32 but isn't aware of _fseeki64. I have therefore modified your solution a little and commited it as rev 15376. The code now looks like this: #ifdef __MINGW32__ return fseeko64(f,off,whence); #elif defined

Acts as tree users: please review ticket http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10843 and add comment with +1 -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to