similar to: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Authentication problem between Cisco router and Asterisk when calls are forwarded

We are using a Cisco router with a T1 card plugged into a PRI provided by a local telco (Allstream). This Cisco accepts calls and sends them to a couple of servers running Asterisk depending on which number was dialled. But there is a problem. When a call comes in to the Cisco from the PSTN it sends it to the Asterisk server something like this: FROM: 204XXXXXXX@<CISCO IP> TO:

We have a client that has a single Wildcard TDM400P with 3 FXO ports on Asterisk 1.0.7. Occasionally the system seems to loose its mind and starts originating calls from that Zap channels that don't exist. The receptionist picks up the phone and nobody is there. This can happen repeatedly over and over again within a few minutes. As far as we can tell these are definitely not real calls as

We have a variable set for each user/peer/whatnot that signals what the outbound caller-id should be sent as with our carrier. When someone dials a followme extension, this does not appear to be carried over for when the calls reach an outside caller, and we see the outbound caller-id being set as 'asterisk' vs the number desired. Has anyone else seen this, or found a way to

My apologies for the cross-posting. If you are a business or individual providing Voice over IP services in Canada then we encourage you to read this email carefully otherwise please disregard. ----- As you are most likely aware, the CRTC has undertaken the roll of regulating VoIP services in Canada and is currently conducting hearings with the goal of putting in place regulatory requirements

I've played around with the lightly documented Asterisk voicemail feature whereby a caller can press "*" during the playback of the OGM and be returned to the "a" extension in the context of the voicemail box. No matter what, Asterisk does nothing when you press "*". It does not interrupt the OGM and it certainly does not return to the "a" context.

Hi, I have released a new snapshot of GnuPG, I hope this is one of the last ones before 1.0.2 ;-) This is still a BETA VERSION and not intended for general use. ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt/devel/gnupg-1.0.1e.tar.gz (1600k) The usual diff file is also available, but this time there is only a detached signature for this diff file, because I noticed to late that the --not-dash-escaped option

Am Samstag, 17. September 2016, 13:29:27 CEST schrieb Karl Mauch via samba: > Am Freitag, 16. September 2016, 13:54:09 CEST schrieben Sie: > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 07:34:44PM +0200, Karl Mauch wrote: > > > Am Freitag, 16. September 2016, 09:26:18 CEST schrieb Jeremy Allison: > > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 02:37:33PM +0200, Karl Mauch via samba wrote: > >

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Jared Mauch wrote: > I need the 'talking' information to better identify rogue people > on bridges. I'm a 1.2 Luddite so I don't have all these fancy new features :) A different solution to a similar problem. I had problems with abusive callers in my conferences. I whipped up some dialplan and AGI mojo to let an admin mute and unmute individual

hi! i've got a problem with samba 2.2.6 to access files. samba is running on a hpux 11.11. the server is not integrated in a domain. when i try to access files directly via explorer etc. no problem at all. when i try to access files via a nutcracker-shell from a pc that is in a domain (but the samba-share connected as user which exists on hpux) i get the following error in the log:

Hi I'm experiencing trouble with a Samba 3.0.7 installation and Windows 2000 Professional clients that lose their network drives after some time. The Samba server is acting as a Domain Controller for a single subnet with about 10 clients (W2k Pro with Service Pack 2-4). At some (random) time after the login the clients all have the same problem: the network drive mappings die (sometimes a

Hi! Jim is right. There is a bug in all GnuPG versions up to 1.0.3: If you have more than one cleartext signature in a file (or pipe that to gpg), gpg does not compare each signature but flags each document as good or bad depending on the first document in the file. This is a very serious bug in gpg's verification function. I have made a snapshot version which corrects this bug available

Am Freitag, 16. September 2016, 13:54:09 CEST schrieben Sie: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 07:34:44PM +0200, Karl Mauch wrote: > > Am Freitag, 16. September 2016, 09:26:18 CEST schrieb Jeremy Allison: > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 02:37:33PM +0200, Karl Mauch via samba wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > my problem: > > > > In the

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 07:34:44PM +0200, Karl Mauch wrote: > Am Freitag, 16. September 2016, 09:26:18 CEST schrieb Jeremy Allison: > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 02:37:33PM +0200, Karl Mauch via samba wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > my problem: > > > In the past "fake directory create times" did what I expect. The creation > > > time

Hi, I had a linux server installed with samba 3.0.9-2.6 (SuSE 9.1) and a samba shared folder among 12 PC under WinXP/Win7. The linux server has been replaced by a new one a week ago. The new machine runs samba 3.5.4-5.1.2x86-64 with the same shared folder and the same smb.conf file. Till then, when the PCs try to connect to the samba share via explorer a window opens with the message "Num?ro

Am Freitag, 16. September 2016, 09:26:18 CEST schrieb Jeremy Allison: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 02:37:33PM +0200, Karl Mauch via samba wrote: > > Hello, > > > > my problem: > > In the past "fake directory create times" did what I expect. The creation > > time of directories were fixed. > > Then I changed to samba 4 and "fake directory create

> Chris, > > I believe it would be nice to send the info also to the list. So > others would be able to benefit as well. You've got at least 2 people > interested :) > > Marconi. Ok, I just wasn't sure because it's more of an 802.3Q/Routing issue rather than an * issue, but if everyone's cool with it I sure will... I'm not the only one who knows this

Has anyone configured the Zoom V3 to connect with Asterisk? I bought one at Fry in San Diego for $99 bucks. I can't get it to register with Asterisk.. Thanks, David http://www.zoom.com/products/voip_products.html

Hello, I'm searching for a router for our company. Does anybody has a suggestion for a router with a SIP Application Layer Gateway and good working QoS (Upstream AND Downstream). Regards Bastian

Excuse me for off topic Can you address me to how can I make some kind of captive portal with shorewall for internet cafe (I just need users first agree with terms of use and after they are gained full internet access). Up to now I use this script http://www.andybev.com/index.php/Using_iptables_and_PHP_to_create_a_captive_portalbut I''d like to switch or tie this with shorewall cause

Hi Team, Just, I would like to know, is there any unlocked device(wireless router with built in FXS port) for home users which are connected Asterisk based VOIP service. I have looked products from Linksys and D-link etc. But all these products are bundled with VOIP Service providers (vonage, lindo and at&t) . Please sugest if any products avaiable in market. Thanks, Karun