similar to: Zaptel on pSeries

Dear All, I've got a working asterisk installation which I need minor help from. Currently, I'm running a Sales Queue, which is answered by a selected group of people. Here are my queues.conf [sales-hotline] strategy = roundrobin timeout = 10 member = SIP/602 member = SIP/603 member = SIP/701 member = SIP/604 After calls come in, it works fine, however, I notice that even when SIP/602

We're got a T1 from Sprint that we use for internet. During VIOP calls, if you download something, the VOIP calls break up. I found some info at Sprint for adding 'class of service', and I also have some information on configuring our Cisco routers. I've read the relevent pages on the wiki, but it seems vauge what's required and what's required by the NSP (Sprint).

Hi all, I am quite disappointed at the application AreskiCC. I have installed everything following the instructions but the thing doesn't want to work. First of all, when I start the index.php page, any name/password logs in. After the login it takes me to a page with a single option "LOGOUT" We are monitoring the database and it seems like the application doesn't

Hi, Jan 6 01:43:09 WARNING[12209]: pbx.c:796 pbx_find_extension: No such switch 'Realtime' What does this message mean ? Something wrong with the switch statement in my extensions.conf or maybe is the module net correctly installed ? Thnx. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

G'Day, I have a bit of FireFly problem that hopefully someone has seen before. What happens is if I make to or receive a call from the FireFly network the call will connect successfully. However, around 10 seconds after I answer the call I am disconnected. The weird thing is same thing happens if I make a call. I've had a look at the * console and I can't see that my * PBX drops

I will be out of the office starting 12/09/2005 and will not return until 16/09/2005. Dear Sir / Mdm, I'm currently on course and are not in office. During this period of time, I have minimal access to internet and email cccess. As such, I might not be able to reply to your queries promptly. I apologise for the inconvenience caused. In the meantime, for any technical assitance, please

I'm thinking one copy a day is quite enough...

On 2016?06?02? 17:33, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > I'm thinking one copy a day is quite enough... > sorry for noise. In recent days, our smtp server has some bugs that mails' Message-Id is changed by accident. So I resend them just for sure. sorry again...

pSeries/powerNV will use qspinlock from now on. Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan at linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig index bec90fb..8a87d06 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig +++

? 2016/12/6 08:58, Boqun Feng ??: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 10:19:22AM -0500, Pan Xinhui wrote: >> pSeries/powerNV will use qspinlock from now on. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan at linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> --- >> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git

There is no need for rmb(), this allows faster lwsync here. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com> --- arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c index 6440d5943c00..47a530de733e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ void

On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 05:48:33PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > There is no need for rmb(), this allows faster lwsync here. Since you determined this; I'm thinking you actually understand the ordering here. How about recording this understanding in a comment? Also, should the lock->slock load not use READ_ONCE() ?

On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 12:06:13PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > We don't really need to do a pv_spinlocks_init() if pv_kick() isn't > supported. Waiman, if you cannot explain how not having kick is a sane thing, what are you saying here?

On 7/23/20 10:00 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 12:06:13PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> We don't really need to do a pv_spinlocks_init() if pv_kick() isn't >> supported. > Waiman, if you cannot explain how not having kick is a sane thing, what > are you saying here? > The current PPC paravirt spinlock code doesn't do any cpu kick. It does

On 7/23/20 2:47 PM, peterz at infradead.org wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:32:36PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> BTW, do you have any comment on my v2 lock holder cpu info qspinlock patch? >> I will have to update the patch to fix the reported 0-day test problem, but >> I want to collect other feedback before sending out v3. > I want to say I hate it all, it adds

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 08:47:59PM +0200, peterz at infradead.org wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:32:36PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > > BTW, do you have any comment on my v2 lock holder cpu info qspinlock patch? > > I will have to update the patch to fix the reported 0-day test problem, but > > I want to collect other feedback before sending out v3. > > I want to

On 2016?06?02? 17:33, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > I'm thinking one copy a day is quite enough... > sorry for noise. In recent days, our smtp server has some bugs that mails' Message-Id is changed by accident. So I resend them just for sure. sorry again...

On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 12:06:13PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > We don't really need to do a pv_spinlocks_init() if pv_kick() isn't > supported. Waiman, if you cannot explain how not having kick is a sane thing, what are you saying here?

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 03:10:59PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > On 7/24/20 4:16 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 08:47:59PM +0200, peterz at infradead.org wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:32:36PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > > > > BTW, do you have any comment on my v2 lock holder cpu info qspinlock patch? > > > > I will have to

On 7/9/20 6:53 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com> writes: > >> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com> >> --- >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h | 28 ++++++++ >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 66 +++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock_paravirt.h |