similar to: Asterisk and a D/42NS

Hello! I am using since yesterday ESFQ instead of N HTB queues. It mostly works OK, but when somebody is using one single sesion (for example downloading file via FTP), it gets weird speed. For example it is 20 kilobytes pres second, then drops down to 9, then 20 again, and then slowly to 0 and stops. But when using download accelererator of some kind or bittorrent client which uses many

On 2025-01-09 15:27, Corey Hickey wrote: > From: Corey Hickey <chickey at tagged.com> > > When ssh-add is used in a script like: > > if ! KEY_LISTING=$(ssh-add -l 2>&1) ; then > echo "SSH agent error" >&2 > exit 2 > fi > > ...the operation fails when there is an agent but there are no keys in > the agent.

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025, Corey Hickey wrote: > On 2025-01-10 01:35, Jochen Bern wrote: > > On 10.01.25 00:33, Corey Hickey wrote: > > > I took the approach of preserving current behavior by default, but > > > another approach would be to: > > > * print "The agent has no identities." to stderr instead of stdout > > > * exit with a status of 0

Hello, I haven''t been keeping up with sending ESFQ [ANNOUNCE] messages to this list, but I''ve still been working on the patch. If you''re curious about recent changes, take a look at the home page, ChangeLog, and README: http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/ http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/current/ChangeLog http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/current/README Meanwhile, I''m interested

I found an old Dialogic card in an abandoned PC, that I think is a Dialogic D/41EPCI based on some googling.. The lspci output says: 00:09.0 Bridge: PLX Technology, Inc. PCI <-> IOBus Bridge (rev 01) Subsystem: Dialogic Corp: Unknown device 0529 I'm just getting started with Asterisk to build a SOHO system. Any suggestions for what I can do with this card? It would be

http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/ http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/esfq-2.6.12-rc1.tar.gz This version no longer interferes with the original SFQ; unlike previous versions, you can still use an unpatched tc with SFQ. Patching tc is still needed for ESFQ, though. I''ve tested this patch with Linux 2.6.11 as well. Please tell me if you have any problems. I''m subscribed to lartc again. -Corey

Hello guys I have a subnet with 255 users, which need to share 1 single slow internet connection, so i would like to implement a kind of *fair queuing *on the UPLOAD between them, which means that they all share the connection equally.. The tools that i have available is: A linux box with IPROUTE2,HTB and TC.. I have looked at some examples, and my first idea was to make 255 entries in

On 2025-01-10 09:57, Jim Knoble wrote: > >> On Jan 9, 2025, at 19:14, Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml at fatooh.org> wrote: >> >> To address this, modify ssh-add to: >> * [...] >> * exit with a status of 0 instead of 1 > > When Damien wrote: > >> Adding a new exit status for the >> no-keys-in-agent case would be >> acceptable too I

From: Corey Hickey <chickey at tagged.com> When ssh-add is used in a script like: if ! KEY_LISTING=$(ssh-add -l 2>&1) ; then echo "SSH agent error" >&2 exit 2 fi ...the operation fails when there is an agent but there are no keys in the agent. This is because ssh-add exits with status of 1. If the intent is to examine the keys in the agent,

Hello all, I´ve read http://lartc.org/howto/ and now i am just confused, i think my skills with linux are not very good, so asking for help. I have a linux box with two ethernets cards eth0(gateway 1mb) with is the host for some sites and emails and eth1(nat interface) with provide internet acess to other 5 pcs. I would like to limit the bandwith 512 k for the eth0 and 512 k for eth1 however

On 10.01.25 00:33, Corey Hickey wrote: > I took the approach of preserving current behavior by default, but > another approach would be to: > * print "The agent has no identities." to stderr instead of stdout > * exit with a status of 0 instead of 1 Please don't. If you want to ever get people to load their privkeys into the agent *with a limited lifetime*, having a

Is there a way to apply wondershaper w/ htb to a port range? I have a ftp server on port 65432 and passive ports 50000-60000. Is there a way to set a range? or do they have to be individually listed? The following doesnt seem to work: # low priority source ports NOPRIOPORTSRC=65432, 50000:60000 # low priority destination ports NOPRIOPORTDST= Mark

In a recent thread on this list, Robert Kurjata provided me a patch to add hashing by iptables mark to the Linux 2.4 version of ESFQ. Thanks to that contribution, I was able to easily add support to the 2.6 port I maintain. I found out, however, that the existing hash algorithm results in a lot of colllisions when the range of hashed values is small. The purturbation spreads the collisions out a

Hi, The default "stop" action for the cpupower service seems to be to set the ondemand governor, but this fails. I can reproduce the issue directly by running cpupower: $ sudo cpupower frequency-set -g ondemand Setting cpu: 0 Error setting new values. Common errors: - Do you have proper administration rights? (super-user?) - Is the governor you requested available and modprobed? -

> On Jan 9, 2025, at 19:14, Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml at fatooh.org> wrote: > > To address this, modify ssh-add to: > * [...] > * exit with a status of 0 instead of 1 When Damien wrote: > Adding a new exit status for the > no-keys-in-agent case would be > acceptable too I think. I interpreted that as "make ssh-add exit with status 2 or 3 or 99, for example, as

Hi. On Mar 12, Corey Hickey posted here(http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q1/012038.html) an updated esfq patch for kernel 2.6. Has anyone backported it to kernel 2.4 ? Original esfq patch is not being kept in sync with kernel sfq, it seems. What people have been using with esfq and kernel 2.4.25, the original 2002 esfq patch ? Rubens

Hi there I''ve searched the archives and googled for a solution with no success - has anyone successfully built iproute2 under kernel 2.6.1, or 2.6.2? I''ve tried various releases, each compile aborting with different errors. If this is wishful thinking at this stage, does anyone have a suitable solution for the "Routing for multiple uplinks" scenario? ie. traffic

Hi, I found E400P quad PRI card quite cheap (749USD): http://www.govarion.com/product_info.php?cPath=1&products_id=2&osCsid=68cdd6e3d08754 in comparison to te410p (approx 1500 USD ) http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=product_detail&category=hardware&product=TE410P Now newer generation with HW echo canceling emerged (te411p). I'm not sure in what things those two cards

Hi Guys After reading http://lartc.org/lartc.html#LARTC.QDISC http://www.docum.org/docum.org/ http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Traffic-Control-HOWTO/ http://www.opalsoft.net/qos/DS-21.htm and a wonderful figure from: http://www.opalsoft.net/qos/ds-lb-214.gif I have a newbie question. Suposse next figure: <--- up 128K internet ----- dsl ---------------------eth1 -Linux Qos- eth0 ------ LAN

Hi LARTC, I have two networks that I manage, A and B. They both have their own primary gateways for hosts on the network, let''s call them AR and BR. There is another box, A1, which lives on network A but also has a wire connecting it to a switch on network B. My goal is to let hosts on B access three particular hosts on A''s subnet (192.168.4.0/24) and let hosts on A access one