similar to: Local/Remote * Servers, IAX/SIP mix and voice-mail notifications

I have been looking at moving from SIP-based DID (Illinois) providers to one that uses the IAX protocol for DIDs. After a search, I've come up with the following: http://connect.voicepulse.com -- $8/month, many rate-centers http://www.iax.cc -- $1.50/month + 0.014/min, many rate-centers Can that be all that there is? I like the pricing plan at iax.cc, because it would allow me to set up

Are there affordable DIDs (preferably IAX) available anywhere outside the US? I want to use it to meet ICANN requirements for providing a valid phone number, yet pre-empting some of the telemarketing calls my domain registrations generate. (Yes, I asked a similar question about 900# availability before). I'd prefer to have a number somewhere outside the NANP, preferably an asian country.

Whoa, talk about flying under the radar. I got a few DIDs *months* ago from Sixtel (or iax.cc). Initial respone was great, but then it seemed that the only tech-support person had fled the country. No responses, bad responses, poor call-quality. I had a few $s left in the balance and kind-a just forgot about them. Not worth 10 minutes of my time to get $10 of my money back, quite frankly.

Here's a question I haven't seen asked nor answered on this list: Is there a provider who offers incoming 900# services? I want to establish a 900# to be used in (about 60-70) domain registrations, to deter telemarketers from calling yet still comply with ICANN requirements for a valid phone number. Alternatively, does anyone know of a source for super-low cost DIDs (like free

If I got poison propagation right, it's probably only by luck! Hopefully, the funnel shift bug is fixed here: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL354905 Nuno, IIUC this means that you do *not* need to change the funnel shift semantics in Alive. So I think that means we're still on track to go with John's suggestion that only select and phi can block poison? (I don't know of any

Wouldn't a branch funnel open the door to a type 1 attack? E.g. if the code looks like this, then a branch funnel basically turns into a standard type 1 pattern AFAICT: struct Base { virtual int f(long) = 0; }; struct A : Base { int f(long x) override { return 0; }; }; struct B : Base { int f(long x) override { // As in listing 1 in

Hi, Sean Silva via llvm-dev wrote: > Wouldn't a branch funnel open the door to a type 1 attack? Only if the code looks exactly as you wrote it. If I understand this correctly the problem with indirect branches is that the "gadget", the code leaking the data, could be *anywhere* in the binary, giving the attacker much more freedom. So restricting these calls to one of the

Don't we need to distinguish funnel shift from the more specific rotate? I'm not seeing how rotate (a single input op shifted by some amount) gets into trouble like funnel shift (two variables concatenated and shifted by some amount). Eg, if in pseudo IR we have: %funnel_shift = fshl %x, %y, %sh ; this is problematic because either x or y can be poison, but we may not touch the poison when

We have these transforms from funnel shift to a simpler shift op: // fshl(X, 0, C) -> shl X, C // fshl(X, undef, C) -> shl X, C // fshl(0, X, C) -> lshr X, (BW-C) // fshl(undef, X, C) -> lshr X, (BW-C) These were part of: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54778 In all cases, one operand must be 0 or undef and the shift amount is a constant, so I think these are safe.

The proposed mitigation for variant 2 of CVE-2017-5715, “branch target injection”, is to send all indirect branches through an instruction sequence known as a retpoline. Because the purpose of a retpoline is to prevent attacker-controlled speculation, we also end up losing the benefits of benign speculation, which can lead to a measurable loss of performance. We can regain some of those benefits

> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Charlton [mailto:asterisk@mcwebtree.com] > Plus if you send your users to VoicemailMain(${CALLERIDNUM}) > they don't hear > it at all. > They just get "enter password". Yup. If you do that, the only time they hear it is during the initial setup call (if you have "forcename=yes" or

I know an email can be sent when a user get a voicemail message, but is there a way to send a message to a SIP phone to say they have a message? Or how hard would it be to write an app that could popup on a PC when there is a message in the mail box? Kyle

Version 2.0-0 of meta (an R package for meta-analysis) is now available on CRAN. Changes are described below. Yours, Guido Major revision R package meta linked to R package metafor by Wolfgang Viechtbauer to provide additional statistical methods, e.g. meta-regression and other estimates for tau-squared (REML, ...) New functions: - metareg (meta-regression) - metabias

Version 2.0-0 of meta (an R package for meta-analysis) is now available on CRAN. Changes are described below. Yours, Guido Major revision R package meta linked to R package metafor by Wolfgang Viechtbauer to provide additional statistical methods, e.g. meta-regression and other estimates for tau-squared (REML, ...) New functions: - metareg (meta-regression) - metabias

There's a question about the behavior of funnel shift [1] + select and poison here that reminds me of previous discussions about select and poison [2]: https://github.com/AliveToolkit/alive2/pull/32#discussion_r257528880 Example: define i8 @fshl_zero_shift_guard(i8 %x, i8 %y, i8 %sh) { %c = icmp eq i8 %sh, 0 %f = fshl i8 %x, i8 %y, i8 %sh %s = select i1 %c, i8 %x, i8 %f ; shift amount is 0

Hi, I have CentOS 7 running on half a dozen public servers. For some stuff like automatic updates using yum-cron, I have Postfix installed with a relatively basic configuration. This allows me to send important notifications to my mail address info at microlinux.fr. When there's a batch of updates, I get one mail per machine, so I can check quickly if everything went OK without having to

I want the ability to setup DIDs in a variety of different remote locations in Canada. There are various providers that have DIDs in major cities, but none that focus on the "smaller" cities. The question is how do I actually setup these DIDs? Thanks, Geoff

Hello All, I am experiencing some intermittent problems with calls coming inbound on my DID trunk. I have 12 DIDs that come into an Adtran 750. From there T-1 to a port on T400P. The problem is that some calls that come in don't seem to bridge properly. Heres what happens. Call comes in on Trunk. Call Routed to correct Zap Channel. Phone Rings. Person Answers phone, but hears nothing but

Hi all, All of a sudden all my IAX DIDs have gone down. I couldn't find any reason other than that the ISP is blocking port 4569. DIDs register fine from my home server, but not from office server, which is not behind any NAT. SIP registers fine. I am trying to change IAX port but it apparantly IAX works only on 4569. Changing it in iax.conf doesn't do anything. Changing it is

I am a Linux sysadmin who has been tasked with developing the phone system for our nonprofit's new US headquarters building. We cannot bring our legacy phone system with us, so I am building this completely from scratch. I have already read "Asterisk: The Future of Telephony" and done a fair amount of googling. I am completely sold on Asterisk, and the new building's