similar to: Re: CentOS and SL, together? -- attributing statements to me (that I didn't make)

There's nothing like asking someone to "give it a rest" while taking the opportunity to make fun of them. Lucky for you (and the list), I can laugh at myself, because I can seem comical at times. But in all seriousness, just remeber to hold us all to the same standard. And we are all responsible for what we say and how we say it, and I'll never claim to be better than the worst

From: Collins Richey <crichey at gmail.com> > I roll my eyes when I hear how good and great and all-virtuous > RedHat is, On GPL. That's all. On GPL. IBM is praised while HP, Red Hat and Sun are demonized. Companies have their agendas, and we need to be _cautious_. But one thing remains: Stallman's Moral Delima Which means that the only thing that matters in the end is

Hi - I''ve been looking around for simple answers to this for a while now, but haven''t been able to find any HOW-TO type documentation. I am administering a site with a remote location connected primarily via a cipe tunnel over a SHDSL connection. We also have a direct PSTN connection between the sites. Seeing as phone calls here are not timed I plan to keep the PSTN connection

Hello everyone, Last week the CVS version of tinc gained the ability to run under Windows, in a Cygwin environment (http://www.cygwin.com), making use of the virtual network driver from the CIPE project (http://cipe-win32.sourceforge.net/). Preparations were also being made to support Windows without Cygwin. Today James Yonan of OpenVPN (http://openvpn.sourceforge.net/) anounced a port of

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > Sorry ... I was talking about the SRPM from SL ... it also build the > kernel modules ... Oh, right, sorry -- understand what you mean now. BTW, one of the worst assumptions I've seen is that because a distro or project ships something, its users believe it was done legally or with permission. I've seen many cases where

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > Nope ... I can't build that with GNU gcc and against GNU glibc and > release it ... sorry, no OpenAFS :( ??? Actually, you _can_. You just can't link it into the GPL kernel program. [ I'm not posting this to cross you. But someone correct me if I'm wrong. ] There is nothing in the GPL that prevents a GPL

Hi all - sorry for the off-topic posting - just that the list of consultants on the samba site is horrendously out of date! I thought that this would be the best place for me to find suitable resources... firstly I would like to say thanks a million to all the samba team for your ongoing efforts and great product. I just wish I had more time to experiment with it! We have the startings of a good

Hey Looking at the Fedora ML there is some commotion about a Press Kit [1] they are constructing. I am thinking about doing something like this for CentOS. Now comes my question, what do people think should belong in such a kit. Do you think this is needed? Cheers for your help, Didi [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F13_press_kit -- Hoffmann Geerd-Dietger http://contact.ribalba.de

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > Agreed. But note that the standards are set long before that... ??? By "standard" what do you mean. ??? Linux's history has been notorious for variance from ANSI, NIST, POSIX and GNU standards. Yes, far less than Microsoft and even some UNIX vendors, but there are still major issues today with this. When developers try

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > Here's a classic example: somewhere in the updates of RH 7.2, > the apache DSO module for mod_perl was finally compiled with > the correct options and became usable as shipped so people > running web sites with it no longer had to recompile apache > with mod_perl included statically. This was also supplied > in the 7.3

Evening, I've got * asterisk up and running with nufone account for inbound and outbound calls from the world... everything works quite nicely except that I noticed last night that when I have a call active from * to nufone, web surfing on the network slows to a crawl... additionally, I have a VPN tunnel to another office (using CIPE) and while inter-office (i.e. - SIP to SIP) calls

Hello, Sorry if this mail would have to be post in the development ML, but my problem is just at using centOS.. I'm trying to recompile the centOS-3.1 kernel. I done this: # cd /usr/src/linux-2.4 # make menuconfig < i select my CPU type > < Exit and save > # make dep # make modules (...no errors ...) gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL/include -Wall

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > Yes, but... whose choice was it to ship 2.6 with lots of broken > and omitted stuff when 2.4 works better for many things? Again, 2-2-2, 6-6-6 At some point, Red Hat has to start the new series for "early adopters." That means being the first to adopt the new GLibC, GCC, kernel, etc... Looking at just the GLibC 2+ generations

I have a set of RFC1918 networks -- a subdivided class C network where my local network is 192.168.0.0/25 and the remote is 192.168.0.128/25. I am using CIPE over an aDSL connection to make my local and remote nets talk to each other. My Samba server is located behind my firewall, i.e., NOT on the machine with the cipe interface. I cannot get name resolution for the remote Samba server even

Hi, during the past weeks i tried to set up a network through a cipe tunnel, building a vpn to some road warriers. With few words, the tunnel is etablished, and at the tcp/ip level everything works fine. NET A : 192.168.0.0/26 NET B : 192.168.102.0/26 trans-net : 192.168.101.0/26 in ascii-art, it looks like this: eth0:192.168.0.5 +-----------+ cipcb0:192.168.101.1

Hi list, I have tried google but just cant get this to work or figure it out. My setup ======== vanilla 2.6.13 kernel with CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RR=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RANDOM=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_WRANDOM=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_DRR=y My configuration: A host with two ppp links. Ontop of these two ppp dialup

Even I've left this thread. I guess we're all waiting for Lee to turn Blue. ;-> Or is it Red (Hat)? ;-> Okay Lee, we all agree, Red Hat makes stupid decisions, adopts buggy software - especially the kernel and Red Hat is to blame for the decisions in the kernel, and also stupidly backports fixes instead of adopting newer versions with the fixes. And there is absolutely no need for

Hello, I have running tinc on my several linux boxes and now I am trying to install tinc on my WinXP box. I can't understand what kind of VPN interface I should install - CIPE or TAP which included into the windows tinc package ? Another question is about variable "Interface =" in the tinc.conf file. What name should I use ? Regards, Igor Belokopytov Tinc: Discussion

Hi All I am pretty new to R but saw stata and sas's macro facilities and am looking for how such things work in R. I am trying to piece together a series of statements: n = 5 #want to have it dynamic with respect to n for (j in 1:n) { eval(paste("x", j, "=x[", j, "]", sep="")) } I want the created statements 'x1=x[1]' immediately executed

From: Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> > Referencing SL3 and CentOS 3 (as I haven't run SL4 as yet) there were some > scientific applications and some Java stuff, eclipse for one, You do understand the redistribution issues with Java, correct? It's a Sun problem (a typical thorn for Red Hat in general), not a Red Hat one. > part of cluster suite for another, included. >