similar to: TAPI

Hi, I've got Outlook to call the number on * using the TAPI interface documented on the Wiki. Its working OK. I have downloaded the Indentapop application, and it appears to connect to * Ok using the Debug modes, but It isnt detecting incoming calls. Has anyone git identapop working? Care to share configuration details? Thanks

Guys. Anybody knows why this is happening? Seems every time I make an internal call, the manager shows this and I don't get the callerid on my identapop but rather the calledid.. Event: Dial Privilege: call,all Source: SIP/intruder1-85f0 Destination: SIP/test-f037 CallerID: 201 CallerIDName: Anton Krall SrcUniqueID: 1117038116.7 DestUniqueID: 1117038116.8 Event: Newchannel Privilege:

Hi Guys! After 1 week or looking for answers about CTI and Asterisk, I havent been able to find the necessary applications to do what I want to do. Maybe you guys have more insight on this. I tried installing asttapi, and works great! Can make outbound calls from outlook, etc.. Nice work! For incoming calls.. Ive been trying software like ascendis callerid, call alert and identapop pro, but

Hi, To make a long story short, I can't install any TAPI driver on my XP platform. A. Within Config Panel|Modems and Telephony options|Advanced parameters, I've got a list of 7 TAPI drivers. Among them is Omniis TAPI driver for Asterisk. B. I can properly configure this driver (line, context, ...). C. When I open Outlook 2002 Contacts panel, I can select "Call this contact"

Hi, This is a bit off-topic, but still related to telephony. Is there a barebones TAPI driver that exists that would allow me to call up a command line with, as parameter, the number to dial. For exemple, Outlook integrates with TAPI, so that TAPI driver would allow me to call my own app with the phone number as argument. ex when clicking on 555-555-5555: the TAPI driver would call

Adding Juergen to the thread. On Fri, Mar 15, 2019, 12:20 PM Shoaib Meenai via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Ping. > > > > Would anyone be opposed to me trying to revive the in-tree Mach-O TAPI > code? > > > > Thanks, > > Shoaib > > > > *From: *Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com> > *Date: *Wednesday, March 6, 2019 at

Hi all, It looks like Juergen landed the TextAPI libraries for Mach-O in https://reviews.llvm.org/D53945, and also had several follow-ups, but then it was deleted entirely by r347874. I'm not sure if the entire deletion was intentional, since the commit message only mentions reverting a certain series of patches; CC Hans. In any case, I'm wondering if there are plans to revive it, since

Hi Juergen, At a minimum I think adding the support to libobject, etc so the various llvm tools can read or even write files from/for OSX should be fairly non-controversial so how about go ahead and do that first (I'll happily review if you'd like) and then we can go from there to do anything else with TAPI and llvm? Sound good? -eric On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:01 PM Juergen Ributzka via

Oof, I didn't think about Clang not being in the same place. Perhaps we could put this in clang-tools-extra to solve that? As for the unification of the code bases. I was assuming we didn't want to just throw a ton of code over the wall anyway so the merge was going to need to be reviewed chunk by chunk anyhow. Support for the two formats should be possible to add in parallel (although, I

Has anyone ever worked opn TAPI stuff to make asterisk work with it ? I'm a Windoze C++ developer dig'n into asterisk (and linux at the same time) since a few months and i'm quite interested in creating a TAPI driver for asterisk. so if anybody did any research in that way please inform me. Also i've you think it's quite impossible to do it we can discuss our idea's

Hi All !!! Somebody can inform me where to get more information about the TAPI (M$) interface of the Asterisk ? Thanks in advance. --- Isamp

Absolutely. The goal of the tool is to produce both textual and binary DSO stubs. This means you could take a DSO, produce a textual stub, modify it however you wish, and then produce a linkable binary stub from that modified .tbe. That, or you could bypass the textual portion altogether and just produce binary stubs from DSOs. While the textual format is useful, the goal is to make the tool

I've finished a patched version of asttapi that will work with asterisk 1.2. There were fundamental changes to the Asterisk Management interface between 1.0 and 1.2 that broke asttapi. I think my patched version will work on 1.0 and 1.2 branches, but I have no way of testing since I don't have a 1.0 install nor do I want one :). I'm looking for testers, if anyone's willing to

Yes, I have the exact same problem. :( -----Original Message----- From: Tomislav Vojvodic [mailto:tomislav@vox-mundi.net] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 5:48 AM To: xytek@hotmail.com; 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk TAPI - Outlook click2dial Hey, thanks for your reply.. ;) I'm also using asttapi from website you posted

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 3:12 PM Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 2:42 PM Armando Montanez via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Since the goal is to start llvm-tapi more or less from scratch, I feel >> the best approach initially is to focus on the structure as a key >> point of

Hello all, LLVM-TAPI seeks to decouple the necessary link-time information for a dynamic shared object from the implementation of the runtime object. This process will be referred to as dynamic shared object (DSO) stubbing throughout this proposal. A number of projects have implemented their own versions of shared object stubbing for a variety of reasons related to improving the overall linking

I would like to hear stories from people using TAPI, CTI or CallerID software with Asterisk. What are you guys using, setup examples, etc. Has anybody sucessfully integrated SugarCRM with Asterisk and how did you do it. Are you running callerid software? Did you stumble into problems like using tapi and callerid software returned both the callerid and calledid? Hope you can help me out with

Right. Usually you wouldn't want to write a .tbe from scratch, but for the sake of linking against a DSO you might only have access to a .tbe stub that was produced from the DSO. This specific functionality becomes critical when DSOs only used for linking are replaced entirely by .tbe stubs because at a SDK level the complete DSO isn't needed. This is what Apple has done to significantly

Since the goal is to start llvm-tapi more or less from scratch, I feel the best approach initially is to focus on the structure as a key point of feedback in initial reviews. Once the foundations are set, integrating Mach-O TAPI in parallel with the ELF implementation should be relatively straightforward. The features outside of stubbing aren't as appealing for ELF, so I probably won't be

Funny how a topic will come up that you have never dealt with before, and suddenly it comes up from multiple directions at the same time. I was recently involved in a meeting where TAPI (which I understand only vaguely) was proposed as way to link a custom application to Asterisk for outbound and inbound call processing, much like SugarCRM and probably others are doing. Today I was asked by