similar to: Problem with TE405P and Slackware 10.0 (reply this)

Hi to all, I have a problem with this wildcard and one E1 line. The server is a Asus P4P800S with the 865PE chipset, and 512MB RAM. The kernel version is 2.4.26. I have donwload and build the latest CVS version of zaptel, libpri and asterisk following the ufficial instructions of digium. I have set up my server in this way: zaptel.conf loadzone=it defaultzone=it

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7683 Summary: New rsync deletes destination files it shouldn't Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy:

New to list, going through steep learning curve with *, could someone assist with how to install zttool with slackware10, the normal make zttool fails, assume I am missing a dependency? (newt and newt-devel?) Trying to test Q.031 pri span with TE405p card, Google has little clue on Zttool and the * manual has a heading, but no entry? Thanks Magnus

http://www.mixdown.ca/~asterisk/ The card seems to be working fine. Don't expect warranty on it though. :-) Why? Because I wanted a quad-span T1 card which worked in the high-end systems I was intending it for, but that I could also keep a few in stock and if the system mainboard failed, pull the card an put it in a standard PC system. I didn't want to have to stock 3.3V and 5V

I'm installing the new Slackware 10.0 distribution - but not sure if i should go with the 2.4 kernal - which i think is the default install - or the new 2.6 kernal? anyone running * and slackware 10.0 with 2.6 kernal? thanks joe

I understand from the archives that * does this occassionally, but I'm trying to figure out why. * didn't do this at all for two days, and then it's gone and done it 3 times in the past hour. It does not seem to be affecting calls, I'm just curious as to the reasoning behind the B channel resets and why they are so erratic. Regards, Andrew

I am trying to install a TE405P which is to be connected to E1 trunks. I have set the jumpers to E1 (closed), but modprobe wct4xxp still fails with the message: ZT_CHANCONFIG failed for channel 97 - which obviously means the card is still in T1 mode. I have tried everything I can think of, any ideas? TIA

Hi, we successfull managed to bridge a PSTN (E1) switch over the TE405P card to our old PBX. So now we could migrate to the * server. But, there are two things we can't live with: 1. A call from the outside to the old PBX is missing a leading 0 before the number. Ex: caller has number 0123456 -> * routes to old pbx -> old pbx sees 123456 as caller number. 2. A call made from a SIP

Just got our 4 port T1 card. I know that I don't have any need to use these parts..this is simple curiosity. What are the 2 expansion slots for? I see a group of pins at the top called 'timing'; what they are for? There is a small dial called 'ident'; whats it for? I'm guessing that the pins labeled 'test' are for manuf testing of the card. Card looks very well

Hi ppl . I am getting a IBM x3200.. This machine can only support up to 4 x 250GB SATA. I need to have a usable space of 500GB and mirror it to other 500GB. IBM proposed me to get 2 RAID cards. Do you guys think i can do raid 0 on the first 2 x 250GB HDD and raid 0 on the second 2 x 250GB hdd, both on hardware raid and then during the installation of centos 5, i raid 1 on both the 2 sets of

Folks, I'm experimenting with bringing multiple (8) analog lines from our local telco into a Carrier Access ADIT 600 channel bank with an FXO module, then having this talk to Asterisk via the T1 TDM controller on the ADIT and a TE405P card. I don't know if this will work well (ie: give me decent echo cancellation, call disconnect supervision, caller ID etc) but I haven't had much

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Gor Nishanov <gornishanov at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eli: > > >> Naively, you would expect that it would be legal to hoist the store... > >> but that breaks your coroutine semantics because the global could be > mutated > >> between the first return and the resume. > > Hmmm... I don't see the problem. I think

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Gor Nishanov <gornishanov at gmail.com> wrote: > >> If you're going down that route, that still leaves the question of the > >> semantics of the fork intrinsic... thinking about it a bit more, I think > >> you're going to run into problems with trying to keep around a return > block > >> through optimizations:

Forget the sound card. It isn't related. The subject above should have read 'TE405P No Voice Problem' or something similar. It appears to be a zaptel timing issue, but I have found a workaround. For those of you just tuning in, here is the story: I have a CentOS/Intel 865 box currently running Asterisk 1.2.7.1 and zap 1.2.5, both compiled from the source available off the main

Clean install of Slackware 10.2. Wine 0.9.20. Downloaded slackware package. Installed with KPackage via KDE, no errors. I have several Windows apps that I used under Wine with Slackware 10.0. I right click on executable, select Wine Windows Emulator, I can see in the process table Wineserver, wine-preloader, and wineprefixcreator(?). Then they all go away, and nothing happens. It doesn't

Anyone care to elaborate on the differences between the T400P and the TE405P? -Darren -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050908/e817f8bb/attachment.htm

This works fine. Message: 26 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:22:23 +0800 From: "Ma Zhiyong" <mazhiyong@sohu.com> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] te405p and dell poweredge To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Message-ID: <004501c56b42$6a12fcd0$7301a8c0@hylaclient> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Hi, I want to install * and te405p on Dell Poweredge 1850. Can I

Hi, I want to install * and te405p on Dell Poweredge 1850. Can I do that successfully? Any one has successful experience on that scenario? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050607/fb7408a1/attachment.htm

Hi Everybody, Is there anyone who already uses Asterisk with TE405P card? Is this card going well with the old E400P or T400P drivers? Are there a lot of differences? In the card's data sheet writes this sentece: "Digium has designed the TE405P to be fully compatible with existing software applications..." Is this meaning the the old drivers are also OK for this card? Thank you

Is there anything to choose, in performance, between a TE405P and a TE410P? I understand the difference between the PCI bus voltages, and certainly don't intend to try Andrew's hacksaw operation :-). But if I choose the card first, and a compatible mobo second, does it make any difference which? Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: tony@softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: