similar to: Unable to create channel of type 'IAX2'

Dear All, I bought one IP PHONE from Integrated Networks which was showed to wiki too: http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Intergrated-Networks I have problems with the Asterisk authentication. It does't want to LOG IN to Asterisk; it always says "LOG ON FAILED". I'm using the IAX2 protocol and all paramters seems to be correct. Does somebody use the same IP PHONE with

Hi all, I have a VOIP phone with the PA1688 chip; my firmware is V1.42.028. This IP phone is registered in an Asterisk PBX and I've a problem when I dialing internal number. If I dial an internal number, like for example 102, the IP phone takes 35 seconds to send the number to Asterisk; here below the debug output 192.168.0.75: first 192.168.0.75: 1 192.168.0.75: 10 192.168.0.75: 102

channel <- odbcConnectExcel("nuova tabella terapia occupazionale mod.xls") > ## list the spreadsheets > sqlTables(channel) TABLE_CAT TABLE_SCHEM TABLE_NAME 1 c:\\TABELLE DEFINITIVE\\nuova tabella terapia occupazionale mod <NA> 'emi tot 2006 OAI_60g TO FU1$' 2 c:\\TABELLE DEFINITIVE\\nuova

Oh, thanks, in my current case, I haven’t config “Address” parameter in A’s host config, is this will make A prohibited it listen on the tinc ports? Question: 1. if I config “Address” in A’s config, and even though A is in a private subnet, it might still possible for A to establish connection with X(X is public IP address)? 2. If there any parameter to disable the direct connection discovery,

H, Narcissus Quick one for the below case, if node A have a direct connection to node B, and node B have a connection to node X, then I found node A will be able to talk to node X, but the communication path is go through node B, instead of build direct connection between A and X, is that right? I tested this in my environment. A >> B >> X > On 1 May 2017, at 3:07 PM, Narcissus

Hi, I keep getting the following messages (or similar) in my syslog: Nov 23 11:38:08 io kernel: [763936.921566] usb 3-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 5 ret -110 Nov 23 11:38:08 io kernel: [763936.972569] usb 3-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 5 ret -75 Nov 23 11:38:08 io kernel: [763936.976568] usb 3-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL

Hello, I have two error messages on user.log as follow : 1. [2001/11/26 14:41:07, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(813) oplock_break: no break received from client within 30 seconds. oplock_break failed for file aa1/EMI/SIGVM00 (dev = 302, inode = 194716). [2001/11/26 14:41:07, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(859) oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file aa1/EMI/SIGVM00 2.

Hello Everyone, I am trying to change our /etc/sudoers (using visudo) to allow 2 commands to be run as root without a password, but it isn't working. Here is the part of the sudoers file that is in question. # User alias specification User_Alias FULLACCESS = doug, scott # members of the FULLACCESS User_Alias may run chown and chmod without a password FULLACCESS ALL = (root) NOPASSWD:

EMI has introduced a second tier price for DRM free tracks at higher quality (256kbps vs 128), which Apple will be distributing soon. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6516189.stm It's obviously being introduced in a marketing-friendly way, but this is an interesting move as it also means Apple will be moving away from proprietary format lock- in (very slightly). -- imalone

The wrong member was compared in the continguousness check. Acked-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma at oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin at gmail.com> --- >> } else if ((ins->ei_phys + ins->ei_clusters) == emi->ei_phys && >> (ins->ei_cpos + ins->ei_clusters) == emi->ei_phys && >> should that 2nd

I am running R.And I want to make parallel computations. When using the snow package under R-2.13.1patched or the parallel package under R 2.14.0dev, R isn't able to create a cluster. When typing: cl <- makeCluster(4) R doesn't respond. It doesn't crash either. specs: OS: 32 bit, Windows XP Prof, SP3. Processor: Intel Core i3 cpu, quad core. My colleague works on exactly the

Hi everyone, I am trying to connect 2 asterisk servers via IAX, but it just fails to do so.. I'm using SIP to connect the IP phones on the LAN at the 2 different physical locations where each server resides and I'm able to communicate on my LAN via SIP without any issues. The problem is that I'm unable to make Asterisk servers talk with each other via IAX.. Here is my issue.

hello i finally have success with winbind!!!! :) thanks everybody so, i use this acl's in squid external_acl_typqe NT_global/-group %LOGIN /usr/local/squid/libexec/wb_group acl FullAccess external NT_global_group "domain group" httpd allow FullAccess httpd deny all with this configuration all is DENID by squid. what???????? it's possible to write acl's specifics for

I have nut 2.6.4-2.3+deb7u1 on debian 7 32bit, with UPS Eaton Nova AVR 1250 connected via USB. It happens several times a day that I get a message about Apr 3 16:41:49 kernel: [422581.049671] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 4 ret -110 Apr 3 16:41:54 kernel: [422586.041057] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 3 ret

Hi, I have two Asterisks identically installed on two computers. One of them is directly connected to the Internet, the other one through a NAT router (Netgear MR314). On the one behind the router I have an X100P card installed for PSTN connections. In the local LAN of each PBX they are several hardware IP phones (Cisco 7960 and 7940 with SIP images, firmware image P0S3-04-4-00.bin). I have

Thanks, Vedant. Yes, we have done a lot of testing of Clang/LLVM (and GCC) in the past several years (more details at https://people.inf.ethz.ch/suz/emi/index.html): [GCC/LLVM bugs: *1,602* (total) / *1,007* (fixed)] [Reports: GCC (link1 <http://tinyurl.com/ojzdt78>, link2 <http://tinyurl.com/oxlkmjc>, link3 <http://tinyurl.com/jd3jnl3>, link4

On Apr 3, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote: > I have nut 2.6.4-2.3+deb7u1 on debian 7 32bit, with UPS Eaton Nova AVR 1250 connected via USB. Which kernel version? > It happens several times a day that I get a message about > > Apr 3 16:41:49 kernel: [422581.049671] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 4 ret -110 > Apr 3 16:41:54 kernel:

Hello! I've ran into this annoying issue when setting up a new server. I have an APC SmartUPS hooked up on a USB-serial converter on /dev/ttyUSB0. This works nicely, until: hub 3-0:1.0: port 1 disabled by hub (EMI?), re-enabling... pl2303 ttyUSB0: pl2303 converter now disconnected from ttyUSB0 usb 3-1: pl2303 converter now attached to ttyUSB1 apcsmart gets into an infinite loop of this:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I would like to build an S4 class that extends a data frame, but includes several more slots. Here's an example using integer as the base class instead: setClass("c1",representation(comment="character"),contains="integer") z1 = new("c1",55,comment="hello") z1 z1+10 z1[1] z1 at comment -- in

I don't really think Address config in node description will decide it will listening for the public connection or not. From my own case, even if a real private node(pppoe dynamic address, tcp port listening not allowed, but Udp allowed) can have a p2p direct connection, I think it based on udp NAT traverse, but if you use TCPonly for this node, and also forbidden the incoming traffic to this