similar to: * intergation with Panasonic D500 and strange echo

> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Nenad Radosavljevic wrote: >> Only way I have managed to get Zap channel to reject a call on TE110P >> without answering it, is to dial number that is not handled in dialplan >> (I >> have a ISDN PRI with 100 number DID service, and about 30 of them are >> handled by dialplan). So far I didn't manage to reject call that are >>

Yes and No The D500 is a terrible thing First problem: it sends some horrible DTMF, so if your voicemail is configured to send #H and *H, it will not work, configure it to send numbers, like 8H and 9H (H is a placeholder for the extension). I also managed to use the MWI (message light), it's a perl script that is in voip-info.org, but with a little correction because the wiki distorted it. If

The Panasonic KX-TA624 series PBXes (and similar models) support a DTMF integration feature that can be enabled for dedicated voice mail ports. What I want to do is connect an X100P FXO port to a jack on the Panasonic and make use of the Panasonic's DTMF call progress tones that it provides in DTMF integration mode. The integration works well when a Panasonic extension is forwarding into

I have a client who has a Panasonic Hybrid system. They are taking in another company as a building tenant and the tenant will be on a new 12 station Asterisk system. This new asterisk system will have 4 FXO ports plus ITSP. The two systems will be separate except that they should tie together for the purposes of dialing extensions directly on the opposite phone system and for transferring

> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:50:50 +0200 > From: "Robert Rozman" <rozman@fri.uni-lj.si> > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Loosing hair on connecting Panasonic PBX- * > - Euroisdn Italy > > I'm pulling my hair down and getting bold :-) ..... I have Asterisk between > Panasonic KXTD816 and Euroisdn in Italy (beronet octobri and bristuff > Asterisk).... Plenty of

Anyone have any luck with connecting Asterisk to the Panasonic KX-TD500. I have Asterisk connected via crossover to the TE110P. We are able to make internal calls into the Asterisk Box but the PBX vendor (I know nothing about the KX-TD500) tells us it is not possible route DID over the trunk. I find this hard to believe. Anyone have any luck with this? Thanks! -------------- next part

Hi, Anybody have an idea how to integrate * with a Panasonic td-1232? We one at the main office, and are installing * in a branch office. We'd like to be able to make calls from * extensions to Panasonic extensions and the other way around. Making outgoing calls from extensions one one side to lines on the other would be nice too. I can put another * machine at the main office, but what is

Hi Guys, I'm looking for a light on the next problem integrating an Asterisk server with a Panasonic PBX using a PRI. The follow config has been working for two weeks and works almost fine, except for some little problems... 1- PSTN provides the E1/PRI (EuroISDN) 2- Asterisk receives the PRI 3- Asterisk provides a second PRI to Panasonic 4- Panasonic receives the asterisk PRI People can

We have a setup running Asterisk interconnected to a Panasonic TDA200. The Asterisk server has a two port E1 card, one connected to the phone company and the other to the Panasonic. Everything is running fine and we can send and receive calls from the Panasonic and phone company. We are using MFC/R2 for both links on Asterisk 1.4.4 and Zaptel 1.4.3. The only detail we have is that we cannot

Hi all, I have an existing panasonic analog pbx in use and a asterisk server with digium tdm400p(2 fxs and 2 fxo). channel 1 -> fxs -> telephone channel 2 -> fxs -> telephone channel 3 -> fxo -> extension 15 at panasonic pbx channel 4 -> fxo -> phone line from telco We call in to fxo (channel 4) and enter the ivr which prompt us to enter the extension number. After

Last week I asked about MWI indicators on wireless phones that would work with Asterisk. I sent a message off to Panasonic asking them about it because in their ads they specifically stated that the indicator works with and requires phone company voicemail subscription. The is the model TG5631. Specs here... http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-KX-TG5631S-GigaRange-Cordless-Answering/dp/B000F4C2CA

Thank you for response. So a "standard" quad bri card can serve the KX-TD1232, no need for anyt special fxs similar equipment. Would like not to invest much more money into the Panasonic, I wan't it out :P BR Amund -----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] P? vegne av Peter Svensson Sendt: 14. juni

Dear Pals One customer has a Panasonic PBX KX-T336 with 60 ext. and a E1 (R2) for Trunks working perfectly now, This customer has 10 wireless links to his branches, wireless working great now, no voice at the present MY IDEA : T1Card into the Panasonic (additional to the E1) connected to a T1 Digium Card into Asterisk as far as I know the T1 Card can be configured as E&M to act as

how does one numerically intergate the following: A=function(x,y) { xy } over the range: 2<x<0 4<y<10 say. ie how would one set up the integrate function? i forgot!

Hello! I have following connections over isdn pri: avaya definity---pri--asterisk--pri-panasonic 500 Just because panasonic 500 can't send user's names. I also want to have reverse callerid for avaya users. But if there is no answer in dial plan: exten => _XXXX,1,Set(CONNECTEDLINE(name)=${DB(names/${EXTEN})}) ;exten => _XXXX,n,Answer exten => _XXXX,n,Dial(DAHDI/g4/${EXTEN})

I have Panasonic TD1232 pbx, few cisco ata186 and linux box with asterisk. Can I dial from asterisk into ata, then indicate phone number playing tone (use DISA feature at panasonic) and connect to any analog phone connected to panasonic ? I think some of Playtones application within Dial application can help me. But I don't know how. -- Pavel Zheltouhov, Comlink ISP, Voronezh, Russia

On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-2] Žiga Osolin wrote: > I was going through documentation and source lately, and I decided how to > make llvm bytecode more compatible to C++: > 1) thiscall sould be introduced, which would take N arguments and the > first argument would always be the C++ "this" argument. This would > abstract llvm compiler dependant C++ code emittion. Sure.

Chris Lattner pravi: > On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-2] Žiga Osolin wrote: >>> Sure. Anton can give you ideas for this. >>> >> I think it should not be too difficult because you allow custom call >> conversions and this is quite easy to add, we only have to garantee that >> the backend will emit it. > > Right. > >>>> 2) the ret

I was going through documentation and source lately, and I decided how to make llvm bytecode more compatible to C++: 1) thiscall sould be introduced, which would take N arguments and the first argument would always be the C++ "this" argument. This would abstract llvm compiler dependant C++ code emition. 2) the ret instruction should be able to return structs (as Chris has already

On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-2] Žiga Osolin wrote: >> Sure. Anton can give you ideas for this. >> > I think it should not be too difficult because you allow custom call > conversions and this is quite easy to add, we only have to garantee that > the backend will emit it. Right. >>> 2) the ret instruction should be able to return structs (as Chris has >>>