similar to: Has anybody managed to get native IPSec working?

hello i am trying to set up ipsec in my network, for now just between two hosts, using to use AH & ESP in tunnel mode to get all of packet encrypted. keys are negotiated with racoon. mayby using tunnel mode in this case can seems strange, but i know what i am doing. after setting up everything i have done few tests with ping & tcpdump. but the results are very suprising. bellow is what i

hi I''m trying to get ipsec working with x509 certificates however I just can''t seem to. I''ve hit a road block and was wondering if someone could help me figure it out. my racoon.conf (I have it mirrored on the connecting machine. path pre_shared_key "/etc/racoon/psk.txt"; path certificate "/etc/certs"; remote anonymous { exchange_mode

Hi all :-) I have a problem with my current configuration of ipsec. I''m using ipsec with kernel 2.6 and racoon. I have two computers linked by wireless cards. The first (192.168.1.1 Zeus) is connected to internet through a DSL modem and the second (192.168.1.2 Memphis) is accessing internet through the first. I want with ipsec to encrypt all datas between the two computers. I can

Hi all, I am trying to establish a vpn tunnel between one CentOS5 IPSec server and a roadwarrior client, CentOS5 too. Roadwarrior use ipsec-tools version 0.6.5-8 (that comes with CentOS5) and server uses version 0.7 (downloaded from ipsec-tools website). My server configuration is: path include "/etc/racoon"; path certificate "/etc/racoon/certs"; path pre_shared_key

Buf ... Solved. Problem was that /etc/pam.d/racoon doesn't exists (I found this tip on NetBSD ipsec pages). Simply I have copied /etc/pam.d/passwd to /etc/pam.d/racoon and now all works as expected. Many thanks for your help Ross. Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > I think it might just use another one like /etc/pam.d/remote > cause I audited the package and it wasn't there.

Dear list, I''m running Shorewall on a dedicated Fedora 7 box. Shorewall is working well as an office DSL router (dynamic IP) with loc and dmz zones. I am now trying to configure IPSec to connect a VPS, "casp", with a static IP to both the firewall and to the loc network behind it. The host to host SA works fine. However, pings from "loc" to "casp" can be

Hi all. The IPSec part of the LARTC howto is great, but I''ve hit a problem in 7.3. IPSEC tunnels. The example given is for manual keying: add 10.0.0.216 10.0.0.11 esp 34501 -m tunnel -E 3des-cbc "123456789012123456789012"; How does one setup "tunnel mode" using racoon? Trying to setup an ipsec tunnel between two subnets: 10.10.42.0/24 and 10.1.1.0/24 using a

Hi, I am trying to setup an IPSEC transport between a Windows 2000 box and a FreeBSD server for a customer... Both systems are on live public IP's and packets are not filtered by any intermediate systems or firewalls/routers in between. I have the following setup: Windows 2000 box: 1.1.1.2 FreeBSD Server: 2.2.2.3 (The actual IP's have been changed to above to protect the innocent..)

Hi! I''m testing IPSec tunnels, having the following test schemma: Host A - eth0: 192.168.1.67 eth1: 192.168.10.1 Host B - eth0: 192.168.1.254 eth1: 192.168.20.1 I''ve succesfully configured an IPSec tunnel in order to safely communicate from 192.168.10.0/24 (which is obviously behind Host A), and 192.168.20.0/24 (obviously behind Host B) In this test

I've been using IPSec and racoon alot lately creating tunnels between FreeBSD machines. Everything works as it should once I've got it running. I do however seem to get delays when one, or both ends of the tunnel drop or are rebooted. On reboot, once the machine starts racoon, it takes two or three minutes for the tunnel to come back up. If I stop and restart racoon, it takes only 60

Hi Running racoon on a Freebsd-4.11 machine gives a kernel panic. I am using the racoon from ports directory which comes with the freebsd installation. Steps followed are as shown below: racoon -f /usr/local/etc/racoon/raccon.conf setkey -f ipsec.conf ping -c 1 <ip_of_the_other_gw> The ping will lead into a crash. The crash dump looks like for th ping packet it

Hi, I am new to ipsec and trying to connect my bsd server with win 2000. I have succeeded to tunnel using pre-shared key. But regarding certificate , I failed to get success. The following are configuration : racoon.conf path certificate "/usr/local/openssl/certs" ; # "log" specifies logging level. It is followed by either "notify",

Hello, My name is Fermín Galán and I''m currently working with IPSec tunnels. Recently, I was setting a IPSec tunnelling sample scenario (maybe the simplest one :), where I observed some strange behaviour that I like to describe in the list, just in the case somebody knows what can be the cause, please. The scenario involves four hosts configured in the following way:

I’ve got a problem that I have ignored for a month or 3 J I’m almost certain this is not a Shorewall problem, but I’ll share it anyway ;) I have 2 ISP connection, with load balancing. here’s some routing stuff: rama-kandra root # ip route show 202.37.230.64/26 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 202.37.230.93 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.1

I''ve got a problem that I have ignored for a month or 3 :-) I''m almost certain this is not a Shorewall problem, but I''ll share it anyway ;) I have 2 ISP connection, with load balancing. here''s some routing stuff: rama-kandra root # ip route show 202.37.230.64/26 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 202.37.230.93 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel

Hi, When a IPSec tunnel is established between two peers, I understand that the "normal" situation is to have in a given moment two SAs, one for each direction of the tunnel. However, in one of my tunnels (peer P1 running GNU/Linux with setkey and racoon; peer P2 is a Cisco router) there is a large number (around 19) of SAs established (this has been observed in P1 with

Will ask my boss :) We are hosted on memset so not so easy to update Thanks On 21 March 2016 at 17:36, Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi> wrote: > Centos 5 is still soon end of life. Using it as ipsec gateway is .. > > Eero > 21.3.2016 7.25 ip. "Mike - st257" <silvertip257 at gmail.com> kirjoitti: > >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mike -

To be fair its not highly sensitive info we are dealing with. -----Original Message----- From: "Eero Volotinen" <eero.volotinen at iki.fi> Sent: ?21/?03/?2016 17:51 To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] IPSec multiple VPN setups Err. Sounds like security nightmare. 21.3.2016 7.47 ip. "Glenn Pierce" <glennpierce at

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mike - st257 <silvertip257 at gmail.com> wrote: > I second Eero's comment, use a new IPSec daemon. > > Openswan was forked and became Libreswan. Paul, now a RH employee, was a > main developer for the Openswan project before he and others created the > Libreswan fork. > https://libreswan.org/ > > EL6 has Openswan > EL7 has

Centos 5 is still soon end of life. Using it as ipsec gateway is .. Eero 21.3.2016 7.25 ip. "Mike - st257" <silvertip257 at gmail.com> kirjoitti: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mike - st257 <silvertip257 at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I second Eero's comment, use a new IPSec daemon. > > > > Openswan was forked and became Libreswan. Paul, now