similar to: Xorcom Rapid 1.0 released

Hi I put a snapshot of our current packages updates.xorcom.com . They are available from the deb source deb http://updates.xorcom.com/test sarge main (this is s/rapid/test/ of the name of the source of the stable version) Changes include: * Fixed and simplified zaptel detection * Support for spandsp: compiled but not yet tested * IAX extensions * Mail server configuration * The script

Hi all Xorcom Rapid 1.1 is here. * Asterisk 1.0.9 * Flash Operator Panel * improved Zaptel hardware detection: should hopefully detect E1, T1 ZapHFC and qozap. No more channel numbers guessing in zapata/zaptel.conf * and much of the "extra" software available for it You can get the full details at http://www.xorcom.com/rapid so I'll just highlight the points that I

Hi Version 0.9.0 of Xorcom Rapid Debian/GNU/Linux/Asterisk has just been released. Main changes: * A decent version of Asterisk/Zaptel (1.0.2) is provided * Includes a better default configuration * Automatic detection of the most common Zaptel cards * Contains more optional software (apache, MySQL, Webmin and others) - available via menu You can get it from:

Hi folks You are welcome to try our (Xorcom)'s latest debs (for Xorcom Rapid, or Debian Sarge in general) "Unstable": Asterisk and AMPortal: The repository is available at: deb http://rapid.dotsrc.org/ unstable/ #deb-src http://rapid.dotsrc.org/ unstable/ The commands you are looking for are: apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade apt-get install amportal

Same question for asterisk-users as well: ----- Forwarded message from Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> ----- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 21:14:04 +0200 From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com Short version: it's now time to remove. Anybody actually uses latest DAHDI with RHEL4? See inline, On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 07:42:39PM

Hi All, The past day or so I've setup a new * server based upon the Xorcom Rapid ISO. It did as promised; wiped the base system, installed Debian OS, installed Asterisk with a dummy configuration. So far so good. If I could get the config from my existing * server migrated to the Xorcom box the I'd be ready to roll. Essentially, it would be the same as I have now on Fedora Core 1, but

Hey Guys, Wanted a Suggestion..Howz this Xorcom Asterisk?I am using it and till now its fine as currently it is in testing stage with 3-4 users. Any Ideas??? Thanks Sharadindu Mohanty --------------------------------- How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos. Get Yahoo! Photos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

Kapejod is working on a fix for the CDR problem in bristuff. See below ----- Forwarded message from kpj@junghanns.net ----- Resent-From: tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:01:25 +0200 Resent-Message-ID: <20060210110125.GU16880@xorcom.com> Resent-To: tzafrir@cohens.org.il Envelope-to: tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 05:19:50 -0500 Date: Fri,

such file or directory" on pure-IP platform in which I installed asterisk-libpri-dahdi trilogy. Maybe, it's me while following README instructions, maybe README instructions could be improved or maybe it's wrongly labeled messages ? That's why I told myself : I'm waiting too much from doc ? is a pure-IP platform too specific ? what is the official policy ? README starts with

I originally wanted to answer with something ... tzarit and kevit Readed probably before you invent rapid biz. I am asking to share any info /experience not your high spirit. Thanks for less trivial answer, G >On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 12:44:27PM -0700, Thameem Ansari wrote: >> I am using the inter asterisk trunking and the article in >> voip-info.org<http://voip-info.org>will

static void senddialevent(struct ast_channel *src, struct ast_channel *dst) { manager_event(EVENT_FLAG_CALL, "Dial", "Source: %s\r\n" "Destination: %s\r\n" "CallerID: %s\r\n" "CallerIDName: %s\r\n" "SrcUniqueID: %s\r\n" "DestUniqueID: %s\r\n" "CDRUserfield: %s\r\n", src->name,

About the IVR, are u using Asterisk? Regards Bilal > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:23:41 +0200 > From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Credit Card processing > machines > To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com > Message-ID: <20090218102341.GD21440 at xorcom.com> >

Dear List; Thanks alot for the help. But how can I let the second dial tone (after pressing the extension to select that FXO port) to be difference than normal dial tone? Regards Bilal Ghayad -------------------------- Correction, on FXO port not FXS, second, read his email first: "Also, how it will be possible to assign an dedicated line (connected to FXO) to an button on the Polycom IP

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> Date: Oct 4, 2007 12:56 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] chan_h323 and chan_oh323 compatibilities To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com Hi On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 11:46:30AM -0300, Caciano Machado wrote: > I'm receiving a lot of warning messages from my Asterisk > 1.2.5/chan_oh323 every time

Okay, i'll move my discuss to asterisk-users. Thank you. On 1/17/07, Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 04:39:03PM +0800, ??? wrote: > > Jonson Player wrote: > > > Hello, I intend to buy a FXO/FXS device from Linksys. > > > I'm thinking about SPA3102. What you guys thik about it. > > > Is ok, is

one under my default context at extention.conf. And what is [pbx_config]? Thanks Eyal -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 4:05 PM To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Is there a default dial plan that is not in

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:19:10AM -0700, Steve Casto wrote: > > https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17529 > Thanks Tzafrir: > Unclear on how to apply patch, here is what I get: > [root at localhost asterisk-1.4.32]# patch -p1 < ../bug17529.diff.txt > can't find file to patch at input line 5 > Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? > The text

Hi folks I've tried asking this in private mail for quite some time, but sadly got no reply. So I end up needing to raise the question here. Sangoma's s setup process includes a small patch to Zaptel. I have some technical reservations with htat patch. It seems that under certain circumstances it may cause exexpected behaviour when used with other Zaptel channel drivers. I also don't

Hi Debian has a package for chan_oh323 (the original, external h323). It is not maintaind for quite some time AFAIK and also AFAIK offers no real atvantages over chan_h323. So I'd like to remove it. Before I do that, I have some questions, as I'm not familiar with H.323 channels: 1. Are there any useful features oh323 supports that h323 doesn't? That the version of h323 in 1.4.21

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 02:19:20PM +0300, Gad Alaloof wrote: > Hi > I'm new developer on Asterisk and i have some questions: I suspect you ended up on the wrong list. Generally this is the list for those who mess with the actual C code of Asterisk. I suggest you follow-up on asterisk-users (CC-ed there). > > I would like to write an application with Java api that does the