similar to: SER Prob

Hello i am trying to use this exmple with SER-0.9.3 but still NATED Clients are not working any other requirement http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=SER+example+NAThelper ----------------------------------------------------------- # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.21 2003/06/04 13:47:36 jiri Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script # # ----------- global configuration parameters

Hi, We are testing a SIP solution * + ser solution for a large implementation. All the clients are nated. When a client is dialing outside the domain (to a FWD sip account for example) all is perfect ! ;-) But ,when a call is done to a sip account, the client is ringing, then the caller can hear the nated client very well, but the nated client does'nt hear anything. RTP issue no ? I've

Hi guys, I'm new to Asterisk, so I'm hoping someone can guide me :-) Currently, I am having the configuration as follows : PSTN -> Cisco router -> Sip Express Router -> Asterisk Voicemail I'm able to get the part from PSTN to Sip Express Router working, but I can't integrate Asterisk with Sip Express Router (SER). Basically, SER does all the registering and forwarding

Hi guys, I currently have a sip proxy server (sip express router) which registers the sip phones. I need to add voice mail capability, i.e. sip express router will forward all incoming calls to Asterisk if the user does not pick up the call in 15 seconds. The voicemail recording stops when the user hangs up. However, the recording does not end if the user presses the # key, i.e. it is ignoring

Hi Users, I'm Setting UP the Voicemails by integrating with Asterisk and OpenSER, After 32 sec or 6 ring, it has to go the Voicemail server of Asterisk, In openser.cfg ........... is not hiiting the Asterisk server ............. ... any one help me ........ .... .... modparam("tm","fr_timer",6) modparam("tm","fr_inv_timer",24)

Hi Friends, need to help. *I have problem about sip : SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized* Is it require to nathelper module in kamailio ? *what can i write kamailio.cfg file when kamailio and Asterisk on same network?* Scenario is like as : ----------------------------- 1) kamailio server on 172.18.100.74 kamailio.cfg ( nathelpler module ) ----------------- loadmodule "nathelper.so"

Hi I am a newbie to * and I am having a problem which appears strange as I did not find any mention of it anywhere in my search. Simply speaking, I have an external SIP proxy server which I am trying to configure for incoming and outgoing calls from my asterisk installation. So here is my configuration in sip.conf [general] register =>

try "sipsak -M -O desktop -B "foo" -s sip:<user>@<registrar> -H <ip of registrar>" the trick is to specify the "-O desktop" parameter + the "-H <ip of registrar>" parameter. Sipsak fakes the host-header of the registrar so that the Snom thinks it is coming from your Asterisk server, then lets the message through to the

Hi List, After some research, it seems the only reasonable thing to do in order to get SIP phones behind NAT working reasonably well without fiddling with the DSL router is to have some kind of far end nat traversal mechanism. Is there any way to do this with open source tools? I've seen somewhere that far end nat traversal can be achieved with SER + nathelper does the job... has anybody

I've got this setup in a test context. [test] exten => s,hint,SIP/7124 exten => s,1,NoOP(Options to $EXTEN) same => n,Hangup() exten => _x.,hint,SIP/7124 exten => _X.,1,NoOP(Options to $EXTEN) same => n,Hangup() exten => Anonymous,hint,SIP/7124 exten => Anonymous,1,NoOP(Options to $EXTEN) same => n,Hangup() I added hints to see if that would make a difference

One for the gurus.. I have seen there has been a lot of discussion about using SER with Asterisk.. This to me seemed like an over kill becasue it would basically be doing most of what Asterisk is doing anyway unless you create some weird and wonderful config in SER.. Anyway, I decided to go and have a quick read through the SER docs and in the section about NAT they say that the best way to

I'm implementing a SBC with my Asterisk PBX but the keeps disabling the trunk group I've configured and I think it may be because Asterisk is returning a 4r04 to the OPTIONS. I've created a test context and have put in a wildcard pattern match to try and catch those options but it doesn't seem to work. Is there a way to have asterisk respond with an 200 OK instead of a 404? --

Why is it that the wiki indirectly recommends SER (or another proxy) out in front of Asterisk. If Asterisk can use radius, and provide the rest of AAA they why ? Incidentall\y, I'm not familiar with network configuration really, although I do understand most of the basics. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version:

I'm interested to hear how folks are handling NAT SIP routing issues "in the wild" for commercial use. Are you using a commerical SIP-aware NAT router solution? If so, what? Are you using a software SIP-proxy like SER or siproxd? If so, which? Do you set everything to "canreinvite=no" in sip.conf? Any comments about real-world implementations would be welcome. Thanks

Hey John, In one installation I have, we use several monitoring tools (nagios based and custom scripts based) and we have the following: ; Reply OK to SIP:OPTIONS [public] exten => s,1,Wait(1) same => n,Hangup : For Nagios exten => nagios,1,Wait(1) same => n,Hangup NOTES: 1- We have context=public in sip.conf, if you have anything else, you must update the dialplan above

Just a tiny drive-by cleanup, we can consolidate i915's code for checking for MST support into a helper to be shared across drivers. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 18 ++---------------- include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git

Just a tiny drive-by cleanup, we can consolidate i915's code for checking for MST support into a helper to be shared across drivers. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean at poorly.run> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 18 ++---------------- include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 24

Just a tiny drive-by cleanup, we can consolidate i915's code for checking for MST support into a helper to be shared across drivers. v5: * Drop !!() * Move drm_dp_has_mst() out of header * Change name from drm_dp_has_mst() to drm_dp_read_mst_cap() Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean at poorly.run> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c

I have coded chan_sip.c so that you can have // sip.conf register => username:password@somedomain.com/redirectconfig [redirectconfig] redirect=yes redirecturi=sip:12345@domain1.com redirecturi=sip:34556@domain2.com redirecturi=sip:87877@domain3.com .... so when you receive a call it will redirect to the alternating uri's with a SIP 300 Message. It works with the following sequence,

Hi: I live in a country where calls from landline phone to a mobile phones is more expensive than mobile to mobile. I have FXO card connected to the landline. All the calls from IAX goes through this interface to the pstn and mobile phones. I want to save money by transfering mobile calls through a mobile phone. Is there some interface between the FXO card and the mobile phone so asterisk can