similar to: Script for compiling custom kernel modules

Hi all I have installed pptpd on my server to run a vpn connection for some clients, but I got this error in the log file MPPE required, but kernel has no support. Can anyone help me with getting this module for the 2.6.9-42.0.3.EL kernel??? Thanks Sherwyn Greene Planner / I.T. Technician Project Controls Dept. Kentz-OJ's E&I Services J.V. +1 (868) 648-0876 -------------- next

Ok, on to new swamps. I would like to enable PPTP on CentOS4 to accept connections from clients running MicroSoft Win2K and XP pro from outside our firewall. I am testing pptpd-1.2.3-0 and tells me that I need kernel support for MPPE, which I suppose is MicroSoft's own form of PtoP encryption. Is there a way of doing this without rebuilding the kernel? If so, how? Regards, Jim --

I have set up a VPN over PPTP on a CentOS server using the DKMS module rpm dkms-0-2.0.6-3.el4 from http://centos.karan.org/el4/extras/stable/i386/RPMS/repodata/repovie w/dkms-0-2.0.6-3.el4.kb.html and kernel_ppp_mppe-0.0.5-2dkms.noarch.rpm at http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/howto-fedora- core-3.phtml. I have configured the pptpd server on Centos4 to use MS_CHAPv2, 128bit encryption and

Hello, We can't connect to our pptp server through our CentOS gateway with a XP client. The linux client is working but not the XP client. I know for a fact that the pptp server is not the problem because if I connect the XP machine directly to the Internet the pptp vpn is working. I know about the pptp-conntrack-nat patch, I compiled the 2.4.9 kernel, with patch-o-matic-ng-20060511.tar.bz2

Last week I upgraded my box to CentOS 6 and I'm very impressed so far with it. The only small issue so far is that it doesn't seem to recognize the new Sandy Bridge Core i5 CPU that I have and you can't monitor its temperature. I recompiled the latest coretemp module from the latest 2.6.39 kernel and the latest lm_sensors version however this still wasn't enough as the new module

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: important User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8): http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails Filing this as important as having a piuparts clean

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas <devlists at shadowlab.org> wrote: > Just out of curiosity, what would be the main benefit of this approach vs DKMS which is already widely used ? > Thanks Dupas. I checked DKMS you mentioned, basically DKMS is just a ko and its sources management tool. It's not easy to deploy ko source into target machine, and it's more

Just out of curiosity, what would be the main benefit of this approach vs DKMS which is already widely used ? Le 28 avr. 2013 à 18:42, Jovi Zhang <bookjovi at gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi, > > First of all, I didn't study on compiler too much, I'm a Linux kernel developer, > Now I have one idea about compile kernel module by using llvm framework. > > In Linux

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 08:14:57PM +0800, Jovi Zhang wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas > <devlists at shadowlab.org> wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, what would be the main benefit of this approach vs DKMS which is already widely used ? > > > Thanks Dupas. > > I checked DKMS you mentioned, basically DKMS is just a ko and its > sources

Hi, I''m currently trying to install xapi on debian (unstable), following the following wiki page: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XAPI_on_debian 1. Install squeeze 32-bits (it''s not specified on the wiki, but I guess it wont work with 64-bit as the xapi *.deb files are for 32). note: you must leave an unused 1mb partition somewhere when creating your

I need some help about kernels, modules and so on. I've installed CentOS6.5 (fresh install) on a DELL E7440 laptop. After all the updates I get the latest kernel: kernel-2.6.32-431. But with this config I've a problem: If I close the screen on the keyboard, the laptop hibernate. When I open it the system restart (I connect use ssh to reach the laptop) but the screen remains black

Does anyone know if load balancing and DNAT work well together? I know that load balancing and NAT do not, but what about a simple port forward? I can''t apply Julian Anastasov''s patches, because they don''t work with PPTP patches. :/ Anyhow, a simple: iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport xxx -j DNAT --to yyy:xxx iptables -I FORWARD -i eth0 -d yyy -p

Hi everyone. I was trying to test a more recent version of btrfs on my current kernel (2.6.37) using dkms, without success. I followed these instructions: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_source_repositories - cloned the repo - symlinked to /usr/src/btrfs-git - patched version.sh: Please note version.sh requires bash (better to change the shebang or fix the script). Even with the

I'm going thru the documentation for pptpclient located on the pptpclient.sourceforge.net site and am referencing the Fedora Core 3 how-to. The docs refer to installing libglade and libxml and when I do so with a "yum install libglade libxml" no packages are found for installation. In looking at the installed packages I find libxml2. Is libxml2 adequate for libxml or would it be

I'm using Centos4.1 kernel 2.6.9-11.106 and I'm trying to install a pptpd, but have run into a snag. the following is where I'm stuck. [root at centosserver noarch]# rpm --install kernel_ppp_mppe-0.0.5-2dkms.noarch.rpm Creating symlink /var/lib/dkms/kernel_ppp_mppe/0.0.5/source -> /usr/src/kernel_ppp_mppe-0.0.5 DKMS: add Completed. Module build for the

Under the old C6 I put an entry in rc.local to run my programs I want. We will call it /path/boot.sh Worked fine. Under C7 I have created a new service file for systemd. It looks like: --------------- [Unit] Description=Company After=network.target [Service] Type=forking ExecStart=/path/boot.sh [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target ----------- For the most part this works every time on boot.

I found that lm_sensors got installed because of a dependency on my first Xen VM that I updated to 5.3. lm_sensors doesn't make sense in a VM. I thought, ok let's check after the update who wants it. However: rpm -q --whatrequires lm_sensors no package requires lm_sensors (same for --triggeredby with lm_sensors or the packages below) Trying to remove lm_sensors reveals these packages:

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) blktap fails to build on kernel 3.13 and probably older kernels as well. According to this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blktap-dkms/+bug/1245009 VM_RESERVED is deprecated as of 3.7. Building with the patch described in that bug allows for

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1309 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1309.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: a41983848e162aabb0fe146db72c0aa38189dde131820336cc550c29f2a7cd43 lm_sensors-3.1.1-17.el6.i686.rpm

Does anyone know how to upgrade the I2C modules *without* compiling the current kernel source? I have a system that apparently needs the current set of I2C modules to work with lm_sensors. If I compile the current kernel source, the proper readings show up. However, with the stock 2.6.9-42.0.2 kernel, one sensor chip isn't seen. Trying to compile the I2C source yields a "Use the