similar to: OT: "Integrated Access T1" voice problems -is this possible?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "OT: "Integrated Access T1" voice problems -is this possible?"

2004 Dec 17
2
OT: "Integrated Access T1" voice problems - is this possible?
Hello, I am currently pricing out various T1 and PRI options for a client of mine. We need voice and data - we want T's. Whether it be two seperate T's, two superate fractional T's, or one combined fractional T, we need it done. We are getting pricing and one provider is telling us that they have quality issues with the "Integrated Access" product. From what they
2006 Jan 26
6
* point to point t1 solution? / alternatives
This has been an interesting discussion for me (except for the sniping). The last post led me, out of curiosity, to this wiki entry: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+TDMoE I was unaware of this feature, and it looks pretty good. I've been pondering replacing some T1's by leveraging IP capacity but of course have run up against the QoS issue. My idea was different... I
2003 Nov 07
2
Softswitch
Pardon my ignorance, but I was hoping someone could clear up something for me. - For a few POTS lines, digium has a single port card for that, or a T1 card to a channel bank. - For 10 or more lines, digium has a T1 or E1 card for that too based on PRI channels - For 100's to 1000's of lines, I suspect a soft-switch is in order??? A traditional phone company will sell: - POTS lines for
2003 Oct 29
3
FW: Voice/Data mixed routing over Digium E1/T1 Card
> The documentation mentions that the Digium channels can be split into some > voice channels and the remainder of the channels used for routing IP > traffic. > > Does any one have this in use in conjunction with Asterisk? Does it work > well? Would you recommend it for a production server? > > Obviously, if this works, this makes for a cost effective platform where
2006 Apr 22
1
Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: whatcable to connect a legacy PBX to a TE410P ?"
The "telco guys" probably did something non-industry standard and reversed send and receive in the jack that they plugged the CAT5 into. Sure it works, sure it is easier, sure it is not the correct way of doing things. Thanks, Steve ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com on behalf of Lacy Moore - Aspendora Sent: Sat 4/22/2006 2:55 PM To: Paul
2006 Apr 22
1
Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: whatcable to connect a legacy PBX to a TE410P ?"
I agree. I haven't had a problem using CAT-5, even for long runs, however it's not a real T-Carrier cable and I didn't know how old the PBX is. Paul >I have not in my experience seen any problems with using a Good Quality >Cat5 vs. Cat 3 (telco standard) cable for X-connects. YMMV, but you >should be fine. As far as the shielding goes, I use UTP cables and >Connectors
2006 Apr 07
1
suggestions on an IP T1 to TDM T1 gateway solution
Can anyone offer up a suggestion on a reliable and cost effective customer premise hardware setup to be able to take an inbound IP T1 and deliver a PRI interface to a remote office? Trying to reduce the amount of hardware required to implement this, right now we use a Cisco router to take the IP T1 in on a serial port and then we go Ethernet to a slimmed asterisk box with a single port T1
2006 Apr 18
6
T1 to cross connect remote PBX and asterisk
Looking for someone with a successful experience similar to this; I have a need to cross connect a 3COM NBX PBX PRI interface to asterisk, but over a long distance. We do not need any IP connectivity and the solution requires G.711u audio so there is no benefit to using IP. Has anyone here successfully cross connected any PBX PRI interface expecting NI2 PRI signaling B8ZS/ESF with an
2005 Aug 28
3
T1 DSU's/Split for voice
Hello All, I was wondering if I could do the following on asterisk... Get a T1 between 2 locations, and split it into a data channel of like 1024, and use the rest for voice channels. Has anyone done this and had it working well? Or would I need to get a csu that allows a split into two interfaces? Regards, Greg
2004 Dec 28
2
Wildcard remote looping
Is there something special that needs to be done to allow a T100P/T400 to respond to a remote loop request? I am having some issues with a Point to point T1 line using zaptel ppp. This line gave us small problems when we had a pair of Cisco 2600's on either end but now with the zaptel ppp it is going down every couple of minutes for 15 intervals. The phone company says the line is good to
2006 Jan 24
6
iax provider
Hi I looking a good IAX service for a *emerging * voip provider. Better with a test account to try. Thanks in advance. roberto -- Ing. Roberto Pereyra ContenidosOnline Servidores BSD, Solaris y Linux Soporte t?cnico ISPs Jabber ID: rpereyra@lugmen.org.ar For reliable and professional DNS, use DNS Made Easy! http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/u/14989 -------------- next part
2015 Aug 30
2
[OFFTOPIC] integrated LSI 3008 :: number of hdd support
Hi guys! Unfortunately there is no offtopic list but the subject is somehow related to centos as the OS is/will be centos :) So, under this thin cover i ask : Is it possible that for a SAS controler like LSI 3008 that in specs says that : "This high-performance I/O controller supports T-10 data protection model and optical support, PCIe hot plugging, and up to 1,000 connected devices"
2009 Oct 16
1
Mixing SIP/TDM in MeetMe
I sent a query about this before, but have some further information and am hoping somebody has a suggestion as to what to try next to debug this. I'm using an Asterisk box primarily for MeetMe conferencing. There are two sources: TDM via two Q.SIG T1's and SIP phones. Conferencing works fine between TDM channels. But when a SIP phone calls the conference, there's no voice path *to*
2005 Feb 28
3
Digium E1/T1 card with mgetty+sendfax
Hi, For the project I've used the Eicon DIVA card. It has 8 BRI ports, and for about 25% of the time there are 7 or 8 in use. So we want to replace it with an E1 card. Only issue is, replace it with what? The idea we have been playing with was to get a Digium E1 card (we already have bought lot of Quad E1 cards :-) and then just put it back to back against Asterisk server. And instead of
2005 Oct 10
5
Soekris and Asterisk
Has anyone on the list used a Soekris engineering PC as a TDM - Ethernet bridge? For example something like a net4801 with a TE110p in it and then using TDMoE to get it into a bigger server where the call processing proper will occur. Anyone know if it might handle a quadspan card ok? (no transcoding, just pure PRI to TDMoE bridging). Craig
2002 Jan 01
1
Transparent bridging / smart rate limiting
I''ve decided to try to make a transparent bridge, that should drop packet''s based on some weird rules. I have googled around a bit and couldn''t find any information about what I would like to do. And therefore I now send a mail to this mailinglist in hope that someone can either help me, or point me in the right direction. What I want to do is the following: Make a
2005 Jun 10
19
Should I choose DSL @ 1.5 or a full T1?
I'm looking to expand my bandwidth for my Asterisk PBX. Why should I choose a T1 over DSL for my asterisk server? I found someone offering T1's for $290 a month + Loops or 3 Meg for $561 a month + Loops. Is this a good deal? Thanks Bart -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2005 Mar 29
4
Shorewall and an inline IDS (snort-inline or hogwash)
Is anyone using an inline IDS like hogwash or snort-inline to drop packets in a system running shoreline? I _think_ I see how to configure it, but I''d be really interested in finding a howto or something... Thanks! Mike- -- Mornings: Evolution in action. Only the grumpy will survive. -- Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed site-wide spam filters at
2005 Mar 15
4
How to extract x rows to get x pvalues using t.test
Hi all, My data genes [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [1,] 25 72 23 55 [2,] 34 53 41 33 [3,] 26 43 26 44 [4,] 36 64 64 22 [5,] 47 72 67 34 stu<-t.test(genes[,1:2],genes[,3:4]) > stu$p.value [1] 0.4198002 i get 1 pvalue for the entire col1:col2 Vs col3:col4. I am trying to get 5 p values for the 5 rows i have. I am trying to avoid a for loop coz my
2005 Mar 19
3
ZapBarge restrictions?
Anyone successfully implemented a solution for allowing ZapBarge call monitoring only for a specific group of agents calls? The issue I see is that the feature only works on zap channels, and all of the agents (in many cases) are IP phones. Allowing ZapBarge and ZapScan on the TDM PSTN (t100p) interface has privacy issues for senior managers, but would allow all outbound zap calls to be