similar to: FW: Broadvoice

Zac, Thanks for the input. This would cover it, however it is not stealth. In some cases, you may want it to be stealth. Again, my state allows me to do this, but some states do not. I've done a little searching and could not find an answer. Basically, to simplify the question: When is it legal to record interstate calls without giving notice, when the recording party is in a one-party

Hello, Have a weird problem when using asterisk (1.0.6). There are certain numbers I cannot dial when using asterisk with my broadvoice account. No problems with inbound. With outbound calls, I can call some numbers (for example broadvoice customer support number) and unsuccessfully with some. However, when I configure my account directly on x-lite, I dont see these outbound problems. Here is a

The USB core was completely rewritten in 2.6, and as such the functions that ztdummy depends on do not exist in 2.6. I get the feeling that these changes are too much to easily fix ztdummy, so I don't expect to see it working on 2.6 any time soon (if ever) I made some small changes to zaprtc to work on 2.6 and I have MoH and Meetme functions working fine in my lab. For production I would

Anyone know of a provider that has 847 DID Numbers? I would like to connect with them via IAX2. Zac -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040512/bd98e86b/attachment.htm

Ok, My provider is sending a call to me via ULaw but Asterisk isn't picking up on this, I've only allowed ulaw, I disallow=all and then allow=ulaw in my sip.conf and that's the only thing I allow, but when my provider sends me the requests, I get an error about No Compatible Codecs: 17 headers, 8 lines Using latest request as basis request Sending to 67.19.245.213 : 5060

The originating PRI system passes the entire dialed number in the d-channel setup frame, thus the concept of a wait time for additional digits is meaningless. Progressive digit gathering implies that the signalling is occuring 'in-band' as would be the case with DTMF signalling on analog lines. You need to look in the Ascom and find the configuration table that lays out the dialplan for

Zac, I tried your PCLinuxOS script and I am getting the following error messages configure: error: X development files not found. Wine will be built without X support, which probably isn't what you want. You will need to install development packages of Xlib/Xfree86 at the very least. Use the --without-x option if you really want this. make: *** No rule to make target `depend'. Stop.

if you have anyone questions about your service you can contact us at the support 978-418-7300 James Jones Broadvoice Technical Support ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com on behalf of Ben Wern Sent: Sat 8/28/2004 4:34 PM To: Asterisk Users Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice BYOD Plans - 3-way and Call Waiting Can anyone who is using Asterisk

Hi All First time poster, long time reader. I just ran into something really bizarre. I've enabled videosupport and have been testing sip calls with Xten Eyebeam software, it works (mostly) However, when I have Videosupport=yes In the [general] section of my sip.conf, broadvoice calls fail w/ "We're sorry your call cannot be completed at this time" So... I've

I'm using Asterisk 1.0.4 with AMP and Broad Voice. I have that with only 5 XTen Lite phones. I'm able to call / etc with internal phones just fine. I can call outside Vonage Numbers, and other BroadVoice Numbers. I have vonage where I live (626) and can call that fine. However, other 626 numbers I get similar errors as below. However, everytime, I try to call cell phones, and or

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Glomph Black > Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 11:59 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP301: Pass-through ethernet port > unusable? > > Have just done a

Greetings all, We are proud to announce the release of LDTP 1.7.0. This release features number of important breakthroughs in LDTP as well as in the field of Test Automation. This release note covers a brief introduction on LDTP followed by the list of new features and major bug fixes which makes this new version of LDTP the best of the breed. Useful references have been included at the end of

> If anyone cares about this, they should let us know and help us > figure out how to compile and test it on a current Debian or Ubuntu > system. I still use this, though on Gentoo, not Debian or Ubuntu. It was removed from the Gentoo tree years ago, also, but still compiles and runs just fine if you pull the old e-builds from their CVS. I'm happy to help test it there. I also

How is -mmacosx-version-min=10.9 being set? LLVM_COMPILE_FLAGS? Or CMAKE_CXX_COMPILE? > On May 2, 2018, at 19:22, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I described this off-list to Zac, but for anyone else who is following, simply specifying the target triple is not enough to have the build system set an older macOS deployment target. I.e the 6.0.0-rc1

I described this off-list to Zac, but for anyone else who is following, simply specifying the target triple is not enough to have the build system set an older macOS deployment target. I.e the 6.0.0-rc1 binaries I've just uploaded have the same deployment target problem. Looking at the 5.0.0 and 6.0.0-rc1 binaries, I can confirm that their deployment target was too new: Load command 9

Hi Zac, Thanks for the heads-up. I've started targeting a minimum macOS deployment target of 10.9 for the release binaries. Hope this helps. Let me know if there are any issues. vedant > On May 1, 2018, at 4:13 PM, Zac Hansen via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The past few packages on http://releases.llvm.org/download.html

Even if it still did add overhead, it seems perfectly reasonable, from a user's perspective (namely mine), that if I introduce unnecessary narrowing matchers to my chain that there may be a performance penalty. The ability to do the following easily outweighs any performance issues for me: anyOf ( /* hasName("..."), */ hasName("...") ) though C++ not allowing

I've been involved with getting better data for running Asterisk on the Amazon EC2 cloud computing system. Here are some calculations I've made on costs based on current published prices on Amazon's system. Feel free to tell me that I'm wrong with these calculations - but be specific if you find any problems, as I suspect others may glom onto these figures as gospel and

On 1 Jun 2004, John Summerfield <john@Corridors.wa.edu.au> wrote: > The jitterbug link on http://rsync.samba.org/nobugs.html no longer works. I > suggest it either be fixed or removed. Thanks, fixed. > You make bug-reporting needlessly difficult, I think. I dislike the need to > subscribe to a mailing-list and potentially receive lots of email that > doesn't interest

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Ha?kel Gu?mar <hguemar at redhat.com> wrote: > On 21/09/15 12:58, Alan Pevec wrote: > >> +1 on my side. oVirt has several packages tagged in from cloud SIG, > >> maybe we can have them in this virt-common repo as well. Or maybe > >> already exists something like cloud-common we can depend on. > > > > We might end-up