similar to: Sipura-3000 - silent dial out on FXO port

Does anybody out there have any evidence that Sipura support is still in operation? rgds benjk -- Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan. NB: Spam filters in place. Messages unrelated to the * mailing lists may get trashed.

I am considering using Sipura-3000s as FXO devices for my * system. Has anyone tried them in that configuration? They interest me because they need no PCI slots and therefore no drivers. I would much prefer not to have any special kernel requirements for my system. /carmi

Hi We are getting more and more email from Mac users asking how they can connect their MacOSX based Asterisk server to a PSTN phone line. This has led to two ideas ... 1) Mid term: set up a donation fund to sponsor the development of Zaptel drivers for MacOSX Note: if everyone who downloaded the Asterisk installation package for MacOSX during the last two months since its release would donate

My apologies for the off-topic post ... No matter what settings I try, when I dial in to the SPA-3000 on the PSTN line, it picks up the call and immediately gives me a fast busy tone then hangs up. The info tab says under PSTN Line status: Last PSTN Disconnect Reason: PSTN Disconnect Tone which seems to indicate that the SPA thinks the caller has hung up. Since I am in Japan, it is possible

A better explanation can be found here... http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=faq#TDM%20&%20Analog_0 > -----Original Message----- > From: Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists > [mailto:benjk.on.asterisk.ml@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 11:37 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FXO question

Does anyone have a Sipura 3k running, and using the FXO? I've got things working right, but if I try to toss a *67 in the dialplan, it seems the sipura is throwing a 403 forbidden back. For example: exten => _91NXXNXXXXXX,3,Dial,SIP/sipura1pstn1/${EXTEN:1} works fine exten => _91NXXNXXXXXX,3,Dial,SIP/sipura1pstn1/*67${EXTEN:1} does not (even if I toss a couple Ws in) I can't

Hi List, I hope this setup must be done by our astersik users.. I am using Sipura 3000 to receive PSTN calls and forward those calls to asterisk for voice processing and after that, I am transferring call to extension through FXS port on SPA 3000. Currently, media of call is trombone through asterisk. i.e achieving blind transfers on asterisk with SPA 3000. Is it possible to stop trombone

Anyone else got a Sipura 3000 in the UK? Apart from CID not working it also seems to not notice any of the line state changes on the PSTN when the remote party terminates the call. It only recognises the offhook signal which gets sent much later. Chris

My SPA-3000 finally arrived and I'm trying to get the FXO port on it to work as if it was a X100P card as far as Asterisk is concerned. I have Asterisk dialing out over the SPA-3000 FXO port no problem. The issue I'm having problems with is having the SPA-3000 automatically forward all incoming PSTN calls to the Asterisk "mainmenu" context (or ext I guess). Currently the

Anybody using a Sipura 3000 for FXO with Asterisk? Mine is working except for one small nit... When a call comes in from the PSTN, the Sipura answers it and then passes it on to Asterisk, which plays extension ring tone. I'd prefer for the POTS line to stay on-hook while the extension rings, and to only be answered by the Sipura when the extension answers. Has anybody made this work?

Hi there everyone! I've bought a Sipura SPA 3000, and succesfully connected it to my Mac, where I installed Asterisk 1.4.0. Both ports (FXO and FXS) are well configured). However, living in Brazil, I'd like to know if there are optimal settings to my PSTN that I should enter into the config of the device. I experience a little bit of echo on the FXO probably because I raised the gain of

I have a Sipura 3000, apparently configured correctly, when incoming calls arrive on the telco port they arrive properly on the Asterisk system - however they don't get routed properly. The Asterisk message: Dec 30 07:47:16 NOTICE[2745]: chan_sip.c:7486 handle_request: Failed to authenticate user WIRELESS CALLER <sip:714XXXXXXX@1.0.24.5>;tag=7f8072c0c46250f7o1 X's are there to

Hi list, Well I really didn't want to see things get to this point, but Sherman at Sipura along with their President Jan F. leave me no other choice. SIPURA has been provided a letter from our attorney for Breach of Contract and damages. They have yet to respond. A quick background. 1. Sherman (SIPURA's Director of Marketing), stated that we would do a join press release for the Oct

Anyone have experience with Sipura's? Anyone know if they offer a warranty? Would like opinions on these, good or flame. We bought *one* to test with and it died, can't even get a response from Sipura "support". Could anyone recommend another device to replace these? Prefer 1 or 2 port design. Ty :-)

Logan O'Sullivan Bruns wrote: > I know Solaris isn't a well tested platform and I did have to make > some minor code changes to get to compile on my sun box. Well done! We need more momentum for Asterisk on non-Linux platforms. Building a community around Solaris much like there is a community around BSD, would be very helpful. This will only happen if Solaris users start sharing

To All, I recently purchased a Sipura 3000 for home use. Generally it seems to work fine, but it also majorly screws up on a frequent, almost daily, basis. Terrible echo problems that come and go, and sometimes it just seems to "lose its way" and can't re-register. For example, I'll be talking to an incoming caller and an echo starts quietly in the background. Within a minute

Ming-Wei Shih wrote (Re: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux for Asterisk) > I am running * CVS head on Gentoo/i586 > and Gentoo/Sparc64 (US60 2x450/1GB RAM), > they are running great. > > On sparc64 * does not compile out-of-the-box, > some hackings in the Makefiles are needed. Great stuff. Please, can you share your adjustments to the Makefiles with the community?! If you don't

Hi If you have installed Asterisk on your Mac using our install package downloaded before Tue July 20th 2004 9am GMT, then your installation may be incomplete, as previously discussed on the list. I have just uploaded a patch which will install any missing files. If you are not sure whether you need the patch, download the Asterisk AppleScripts collection at

Hi anybody who would like to test drive a pre-release of the first OSX Assistant please visit the Wiki ... http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+MacOSX+Support if you find any bugs please let me know by email: benjamin (at) sunrise-tel (dot) com. Please take into account that this assistant is in the tradition of Apple's setup assistants which are always trading ease of use

Jayson Vantuyl wrote: > Mmmmmm. I'm should patent that. > Something like "Patent for Using Spam > Filters to Block Stuff That Isn't Spam" or > something equally obvious. I like it. That won't make it even past the sloppiest examiner. You would have to wrap it up nicely and present it as something novel, like so ... ------------------------- Method and