similar to: Distinctive ring detection problem

Is it possible to allow distinctive rings work for FXS ports as well? I need a certain FXS extension to ring a distinctive double ring. I modified zapata.conf appropriately for dring1,dring2 and it just Seems to ignore my updates. Do distinctive rings only work for FXO ports? Paul Seniuk -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Paul Seniuk.vcf

Hello all! We have a PSTN line with four numbers calling into it. There is distinctive ring on these lines. They are are follows: 1. standard ring 2. short ring 3. long ring 4. short ring, long ring, short ring Based on the information I have been able to find, I have created the following entries in my zapata.conf file, to try and weed out some of the timings: dring1=95,0,0

Hi All, I was wondering what the status of distinctive ring support in Asterisk is? I had a google search & read and Mark Spencer wrote some support for it. Is distinctive ring different in every country or is it pretty standard? And for my final question, does the Wildcard FXO card support distinctive ring? Essentially what I'm trying to do is route incoming calls with ring #1 to,

Hi, all I have installed TDM400 with 1 FXS and 1 FXP ports. Now I am goig through documentation on how to configure it. It mentions 3 protocols: Loopstart, Groundstart and Koolstart. Which one do I use? Can someone send me sample zaptel.conf file for Australia? This will save me some time and will be used as a working example. Thanks, Rudolf

I have a bit of a weird problem that I'm having great trouble debugging. I have a TDM400P PCI card with two FXO and two FXS modules. Both FXO modules are connected to BT lines here in the UK. Both BT lines have V23 Caller-ID, which works fine with Asterisk. Both asterisk and zaptel are fresh from CVS. Both FXO modules (channels 3 and 4) are in "group 1" for outgoing calls. My

What can I do because my X100P don´t answer sometimes. I put these parameters in the zapata.conf, but sometimes my X100P don´t answer. usedistinctiveringdetection=yes dring1=363,137,0 dring1context=incoming2 Any sugestion? Thank´s --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

Hello! We are using the Digium 405PP card, and getting the following messages: Jun 16 16:16:17 NOTICE[81926]: chan_zap.c:6832 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: 6 on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jun 16 16:16:17 NOTICE[81926]: chan_zap.c:6832 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: 8 on Primary D-channel of span 1 My config file is below. We are trying to set up D-Channel on channel 24, 1-23 in trunk group 1,

Hi, I'm trying to start with Asterisk, but I could not put 2 softphones to talk. The asterisk server rejects the connections always when I dial. May 17 07:49:22 NOTICE[1924]: Rejected connect attempt from 192.168.0.106 What is necessary to put it to work? There is no need to configure external lines. extensions.conf [internal1] exten => 311000,1,Dial(SIP/teste1) [internal2] exten

Hi gang. Just put an FXS port on a Zap interface for the first time. I can't figure out which parameters in zapata.conf are global and which ones can be channel specific & nested. I have mucked around with it but I can't seem to make any effect on the gain levels on a per channel basis. dring1context=pbx } dring1=0,0,0 } obviously global because it sets conditions for

I'm using Asterisk 1.4.5 (will try 1.4.6 on Thursday, but I don't see anything in the changelog after the 1.4.5 release dealing with distinctive ring), zaptel 1.4.3, and wanpipe 2.3.4-10 with a Sangoma A200 card. I enabled usedistinctiveringdetection in zapata.conf. However, on the Asterisk console, the output I get is: -- Detected ring pattern: 0,0,0 It would appear that Asterisk is

Hi All, I have just migrated from Asterisk 1.0.0 to Asterisk 1.0.5 and I have an X100P installed. The old asterisk was working, but now the new version isn't picking up any calls! However, I did notice that after installation, I performed modprobe zaptel and modprobe wcfxo and they worked fine, but when I executed ztcfg, I get the following errors: ioctl(ZT_LOADZONE) failed: Invalid

Hi All, Having searched the archives, I can see there has been much discussion at various points regarding capture of caller id information from good old BT. If I understand correctly, it seems that not only do the drivers not currently support it, but my X101P possibly/probably can't do it anyway due to hardware? So, that leaves me with the modem route, which seems more and more unlikely,

Steve, Here is the config, I pulled from my server, that works with D'Link Phones: Main Menu -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIP.CONF [general] port = 5060 ; Port to bind to (SIP is 5060) ;bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 ; Address to bind to (all addresses on machine) bindaddr = 67.109.153.236 disallow=all ;allow=ilbc allow=gsm allow=ulaw

Hi.. I know this isn't a centos/rhel/fedora issue... but i'm hopeful that someone might have an answer!!! thanks VVVVVVVVVV Got a bit of an issue here, that I can't seem to resolve. I have a test domain on a dynamic service (dyndns.org). the test domain is foo.gotdns.com, which i have pointing to my external cable/dsl address. Here's my issue, I would really like to be able to

Sorry for the long descritpion of the problem, I''d like to know If I misunderstand something or if I meet an intrinsic limit of my setup. 217.58.51.162 HDSL eth1 - SRV_XP: 192.168.254.10 eth0: 192.168.254.1 -----+------------------+------- 81.121.243.250 ADSL eth3 - I want to allow incoming pptp request (port 1723) to be forwarded to srv_xp

All, Alright, I've looked around the internet, the voip-info.org wiki, and browsed the contents of this mailing list. While I've found a couple of scenarios that are close to this one, I haven't found one that uses my particular card (T100P). Without further delay -- I have successfully configured internal SIP services between a Snom 200 and a Windows X-Lite client and have

I've followed the recent thread on caller id with UK British Telecom networks (where the caller id data is delivered before the first ring). My understanding is that if I use a recent CVS head (e.g. CVS-HEAD-09/18/04-17:45:52) and a TDM400 with FXO modules, all I need to do is include the line: usecallerid=uk In my zapata.conf (in the [channels] section) I've done this, but I get: Sep

I know this subjeact has been beaten in here so much, but, here is my issue.<br /><br />I have a TDM400 with 2 ports tied into our telco lines. I have run fxotune on the lines, and have got the conf file in my /etc folder. I have fxotune loading in my startup right after the drivers load up, then asterisk loads up. <br /><br />Problem! When calling out, we get a horible

I tried implementing my * and it didn't pass the spouse factor at this time. I wanted to hook it up for outbound only at this point to get a better handle on the dial plans and the echo problem. I thought this might have been done before as a natural part of testing - but maybe not. In wcfxo.c I found this: if (!wc->offhook && !wc->ringdebounce) { if

I'm trying to duplicate a behavior we had with our old avaya system, and I've come across Auto Answer (Ring Answer). However, its not quite the same yet. Right now, when I dial **5053, it will add the SIP header for Ring Answer and it will call 5053. The phone auto pickups just fine. However, we need that call to be muted. If you were to call into a meeting, we wouldn't want them to